Skip to main content

A green TLC densitometric method for the simultaneous detection and quantification of naphazoline HCl, pheniramine maleate along with three official impurities

Abstract

Impurity profiling of a pharmaceutical compound is now taking great attention during quality assessment of pharmaceuticals, as presence of small amount of impurities may affect safety and efficacy. In this work, a novel TLC chromatographic method coupled with densitometric detection was established for the simultaneous quantification of naphazoline HCl, pheniramine maleate and three of their official impurities, namely; naphazoline impurity B, pheniramine impurities; A & B. Chromatographic separation was carried out on TLC aluminum silica plates F254, as a stationary phase, using methanol: ethyl acetate: 33.0% ammonia (2.0: 8.0: 1.0, by volume), as a mobile phase. Plates were examined at 260.0 nm and International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines were followed for method’s validation. Important factors, such as; composition of mobile phase and detection wavelengths were optimized. Linearity was achieved over the ranges of 2.0–50.0 µg band−1 for naphazoline, 10.0–110.0 µg band−1 for pheniramine, 0.1–10.0 µg band−1 for naphazoline impurity B and 2.0–50.0 µg band−1 for both pheniramine impurities. The proposed method was assessed in terms of accuracy, precision and robustness where satisfactory results (recovery % ≈ 100% and RSD < 2) were obtained. The method was also applied for the simultaneous determination of naphazoline HCl and pheniramine maleate, in Naphcon-A® eye drops, with respective recoveries of 101.36% and 100.94%. Method greenness was evaluated and compared to the reported HPLC one via environmental, health and safety tool. The developed method has much potential over the reported one of being simple, selective, economic and time saving for the analysis of the five cited compounds.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

A great attention was given, by modern pharmaceutical analysis, to impurity profiling of the drug substances, as the presence of impurities, even in trace amounts, may affect the quality, potency and safety of the drug product [1]. In a different manner, Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) is one of the most familiar and adaptable techniques used in detection and quantification of related impurities in the pharmaceutical filed. It has several advantages including; simplicity, cost-effectiveness, rapidness as well as good resolving power with accurate quantification of multicomponent mixtures [2].

Naphazoline HCl (NPZ) is chemically known as 2-(naphthalen-1-ylmethyl)-4, 5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; hydrochloride. It has a decongestant property through mimicking the sympathetic influence on alpha-adrenergic receptors. It plays an important role in managing allergic conjunctiva, as it can reduce eye swelling and edema by acting on those receptors in the conjunctiva arterioles [3]. NPZ is an authorized drug in the United States (USP) [4] and British (BP) [5] pharmacopeias where its determination was carried out by HPLC methods. Moreover, the BP states four specified official impurities; one of them is impurity B (NPZ impurity B). On reviewing literature, NPZ has been determined as a single drug or in combination using several techniques, namely; spectrophotometry [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], HPLC [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27], TLC [28] and capillary electrophoresis [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

Pheniramine maleate (PHN) is chemically designed as (Z)-but-2-enedioic acid; N, N-dimethyl-3-phenyl-3-pyridin-2-ylpropan-1-amine. It is widely available in eye drops due to its antihistaminic and anticholinergic effect [37]. PHN is official in USP and BP whereas HPLC technique was reported for its assay. Two impurities were stated in BP for PHN, namely; A & B [5]. The literature survey revealed different techniques for its quantification either in single or in combined form, such as titrimetric [38], spectrophotometric [39, 40], HPLC [17,18,19, 27, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48] and capillary electrophoretic ones [36, 49].

NPZ and PHN are usually co-formulated together in optic dosage forms used for eye inflammation treatment. The literature survey revealed some methods for their simultaneous quantification, such as HPLC [17,18,19, 27] and one capillary electrophoresis [36]. One of the reported HPLC methods described their determination in presence of three selected impurities [19]. As a result, the aim of this work was to develop a first validated, as per ICH guidelines [50], TLC densitometric method for detection and quantification of NPZ, PHN, NPZ impurity B, PHN impurities; A and B, (Fig. 1). The proposed method was successfully applied for their simultaneous determination in a quinary mixture as well as in pharmaceutical eye drops. Furthermore, the organic solvents used in this work were assessed and compared to that used in the reported HPLC one [19] by the aid of environmental, health and safety (EHS) tool [51].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Chemical structures of the five cited components

Methods/Experimental

Instruments

TLC system; a Camag Linomat autosampler (Muttenzl, Switzerland), a Camag micro syringe (100 µL), a Camag 35/N/30319 TLC scanner with win CATS software, UV lamp with a short wavelength at 260 nm (Desaga, Wiesloch, Germany) and TLC plates (10 × 20 cm) pre-coated with silica gel GF254 of 0.25 mm thickness (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).

Materials and chemicals

Pure standard

NPZ and PHN were kindly provided by Eva pharma pharmaceutical company, Cairo, Egypt. Their purities were assessed to be 100.12 ± 0.102% and 99.58 ± 0.124%, respectively [5]. The impurities (NPZ impurity B, PHN impurities; A & B) were purchased from the German company Alfa Aesar Company. Their certified potency values were found to be 99.00%, 100.30%, and 99.70%, respectively.

Pharmaceutical dosage form

Naphcon-A® eye drops (Batch no.H13949-0615); manufactured by Alcon laboratories INC (Novartis Company), labeled to contain 0.25 & 3.0 mg mL−1 of NPZ and PHN, respectively, and has been purchased from Egyptian market.

Chemicals and reagents

Analytical-grade chemicals were used; methanol (Alpha, Egypt), ethyl acetate (Otsuka, Egypt), chloroform, acetone, 33.0% ammonia (El-Nasr, Egypt), hydrochloric acid (Sigma, Germany), 30.0% hydrogen peroxide solution (Adwic, Egypt) and sodium hydroxide pellets (Piochem, Egypt).

Solutions

Standard solutions

In 10-mL volumetric flasks, standard solutions of 20.0 mg mL−1, for NPZ, PHN and two PHN impurities, were separately prepared in methanol. For NPZ impurity B, 1.0 mg mL−1 standard solution was prepared.

Laboratory prepared mixtures

Different aliquots, from the five standard solutions, were transferred into separate 10-mL volumetric flasks to prepare laboratory prepared mixtures of various ratios. The volume of each flask was then completed to the mark using methanol.

Procedures

Construction of the calibration curves

Aliquots equivalent to 2.0–50.0 mg of NPZ, 10.0–110.0 mg of PHN, 0.1–10.0 mg of NPZ impurity B and 2.0–50.0 mg of two PHN impurities (A & B) were transferred from their corresponding solutions into five sets of 10-mL volumetric flasks. Volumes were then completed to the mark with methanol. 10.0 µL from each solution was applied as a band with 3.0 mm length onto TLC plates (10 × 20 cm). A mobile phase of methanol: ethyl acetate: 33.0% ammonia (2.0: 8.0: 1.0, by volume) was used for elution over 8.5 cm distance. The elution time was around 6.0 min. After that, the plates were removed, air dried and scanned at 260.0 nm. Calibration curves, for the five cited drugs, representing the polynomial relationship between peak area and corresponding concentration were constructed and regression parameters were computed.

Assay of laboratory prepared mixtures

Different mixtures of NPZ, PHN and their official impurities were prepared as mentioned under solution section and mixed with different ratios. The prepared mixtures were then analyzed by the proposed method as mentioned above.

Forced degradation study

Stability of the two cited drugs were studied under different conditions, namely; acidic, alkaline, oxidative, photolytic and thermal ones. For acidic and alkaline hydrolyses, a mass of 10 mg of each drug was separately dissolved in least amounts of methanol then refluxing in 1 M HCl or methanolic solutions of 1 M NaOH at 100 °C for 2 h. For oxidative studies, 0.5 mL of 5% H2O2 aqueous solution was separately added to 10 mL of 1.0 mg mL−1 solutions. The two drugs solutions were then kept at room temperature for 24 h. For photolytic study, thin layers of each powdered drug was uniformly spread in two Petri dishes, and exposed to UV light at 254 nm for 10 h at a distance of 15 cm. Thermal degradation was assessed through sealing each powdered drug in glass ampoules and heating in a thermostatic oven at 100 °C for 7 h. Finally, samples were periodically withdrawn for observing the forced degradation process.

Pharmaceutical application

The content of 10 Naphcon-A® eye drops were emptied. 20.0 mL aliquot was transferred into a 25-mL measuring flask. 3.0 mL methanol was added and the flask was then sonicated for 20.0 min. Volume was completed to the mark using methanol to obtain final concentration of 200.0 µg mL−1 NPZ and 2400.0 µg mL−1 PHN. 10.0 µLs from this solution were applied onto TLC plates. Finally, solutions were analyzed as mentioned before under construction of the calibration curves.

Results and discussion

The importance of impurity detection and determination evokes the requirement for developing simple, economical, rapid and accurate analytical techniques which can be utilized easily in quality control laboratories wherein cost and time are essential. Owing to simplicity, cost effectiveness, time saving, no need for tedious sample preparation and high sensitivity, TLC densitometry could be considered as one of the best options for that purpose [2, 52, 53] Here, we present a novel TLC densitometric method for the simultaneous determination of NPZ, PHN and three related official impurities (NPZ impurity B, PHN impurities; A & B) in their quinary mixture. Moreover, EHS tool is applied for greenness evaluation of this method in comparison to our previously reported HPLC one [19].

Development and optimization of TLC densitometric method

Various mobile phases were tried to get optimum separation and resolution between the five cited components. Firstly, mixtures with different ratios of methanol and ethyl acetate have been tried, but the separation between the five cited components was not achieved. Thus, different solvents were added individually to the previous mixture for improving the separation between the studied components such as chloroform, acetone and ammonia. Table 1 summarizes the obtained resolution values during this optimization phase. It was noticed that addition of ammonia to the conventional mixture enhanced separation and resolution between the studied drugs. Finally, a mixture of methanol–ethyl acetate–ammonia (2.0: 8.0: 1.0, by volume) was chosen for optimum suitability parameters. Moreover, different wavelengths were tried for evaluating the densitometric measurement as 260.0 nm and 280.0 nm. 260.0 nm was the wavelength of choice as it gave the highest sensitivity with minimum noise for measuring the five cited components. Retardation factor (Rf) values were sequentially at 0.18 ± 0.02, 0.35 ± 0.02, 0.49 ± 0.02, 0.63 ± 0.02 and 0.83 ± 0.02 for NPZ impurity B, NPZ, PHN, PHN impurity A and PHN impurity B (Fig. 2). Scanning profiles were obtained at 260.0 nm, and five calibration curves were then plotted.

Table 1 The obtained resolution values during mobile phase optimization
Fig. 2
figure 2

TLC chromatogram of NPZ (30.0 µg band −1), PHN (90.0 µg band −1) and three of their official impurities as NPZ impurity B (10.0 µg band −1), PHN impurity A (40.0 µg band −1) and PHN impurity B (40.0 µg band −1) using a mobile phase of methanol: ethyl acetate: ammonia (2.0: 8.0: 1.0, by volume) and detection at 260.0 nm

System suitability parameters

To evaluate the performance of the proposed TLC method, system suitability parameters were calculated manually [54]. The results of retardation, resolution, capacity and tailing factors for the five components were obtained in Table 2.

Table 2 Parameters required for system suitability tests of TLC densitometric method

Method validation

Method’s validation was conducted in agreement to ICH guidelines [50].

Linearity and range

Polynomial relationships were established between the integrated peak area and the corresponding concentration in the ranges of 2.0  − 50.0 µg band −1, 10.0–110.0 µg band −1, 0.1  − 10.0 µg band −1 and 2.0  − 50.0 µg band −1 for NPZ, PHN, NPZ impurity B and the two PHN related impurities, respectively.

Accuracy

Accuracy was assessed by applying the previously mentioned procedures on pure samples with various concentrations within the defined ranges. Satisfactory results regarding recovery % were computed in Table 3.

Table 3 Regression parameters for determination of the studied drugs by the proposed TLC densitometric method

Precision

Repeatability

Three separate concentrations of NPZ (15.0, 25.0, 40.0 µg band−1), PHN (30.0, 50.0, 70.0 µg band−1), NPZ impurity B (3.0, 5.0, 8.0 µg band−1), PHN impurities; A & B (15.0, 25.0, 40.0 µg band−1) were analyzed intra-daily three times. Results were obtained preliminary to RSD calculation, Table 3.

Intermediate precision

Inter-daily analysis was also conducted for the formerly selected concentrations. Results are represented in Table 3.

Robustness

It was evaluated by studying the effect of deliberately changing the mobile phase composition; methanol (2.0 ± 0.2 mL), ethyl acetate (8.0 ± 0.2 mL) and ammonia (1.0 ± 0.1 mL). This study was conducted on three independent concentrations of NPZ (5.0, 20.0, 40.0 µg band−1), PHN (15.0, 40.0, 70.0 µg band−1), NPZ impurity B (1.0, 5.0, 8.0 µg band−1) and two PHN impurities (1.0, 20.0, 40.0 µg band−1 each). Satisfactory RSDs were obtained, Table 3.

Specificity

It was assessed by analysis of different laboratory prepared mixtures containing various ratios of the five studied components. Table 3 shows good recovery percentages and RSDs for analyzing those mixtures. Furthermore, forced degradation study was conducted whereas the two drugs were subjected to different stress conditions: (1) Acidic and alkaline hydrolysis via refluxing with 1 M HCl and 1 M NaOH for 2 h, respectively, (2) Oxidative degradation through treatment of each solution with 5% H2O2 then keeping at room temperature for 24 h, (3) Photostability on powdered drugs placed in petri dishes, using 254 nm UV light for 10 h, and finally (4) Dry heat by putting each drug powder in 100 °C oven for 7 h. The degradation study was monitored by the proposed TLC method. NPZ was only liable to alkaline hydrolysis giving its impurity B where its spot (Rf ≈ 0.35) disappeared accompanied by appearance of a new one (Rf ≈ 0.18) corresponding to this specified impurity. This outcome is consistent with what previously reported [20]. PHN was stable towards all conditions except for oxidation where ≈ 30.0% was degraded upon H2O2 treatment (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

TLC chromatogram of 100 µg band−1 PHN after H2O2 treatment; Rf ≈ 0.49 for PHN & ≈ 0.32 for its oxidative degradation

Analysis of pharmaceutical eye drops

The two active pharmaceutical ingredients (NPZ and PHN) were simultaneously quantified in their combined dosage form. Excipients did not have an impact on the obtained TLC chromatograms. In addition, method’s validity was proved using standard addition technique, Table 4.

Table 4 Determination of NPZ, PHN in their dosage form and application of standard addition technique using the proposed TLC method

Statistical analysis

Statistical comparison between results of the suggested TLC method and that of official HPLC ones [5] were performed. The calculated values of student’s t-test and F-test indicated that there is no significant difference observed between those methods, Table 5.

Table 5 Statistical comparison between the results obtained by the proposed method and the official BP method

Greenness evaluation and methods comparison

In order to assess and compare this work with our previously reported HPLC one [19], EHS tool was applied. In this tool, nine categories representing safety, health and environmental hazards are utilized for organic solvents assessment whereas the lower the calculated score, the greener the solvent will be [51]. The calculated scores for methanol, ethyl acetate (used in this work) and acetonitrile (used in reported HPLC) revealed the dominance of the proposed method over our previously reported one in terms of environmental sustainability, Table 6. Finally, a comparative overview on those two methods along with a statistical F-test for their variances are shown in Table 7.

Table 6 EHS assessment of the solvents used in this work (ethyl acetate & methanol) as well as the reported one (acetonitrile)
Table 7 Comparative overview on reported HPLC and proposed TLC methods

Conclusion

A novel simple TLC densitometric method was established for the simultaneous detection and quantification of NPZ, PHN as well as three of their official impurities (NPZ impurity B, PHN impurities; A & B). The proposed method was validated in agreement to ICH guidelines. NPZ and PHN were successfully determined in their combined eye drops. EHS tool was utilized for greenness assessment of the organic solvents used in this work as well as the previously reported HPLC one. The proposed TLC densitometric method provides simplicity, low cost, fast analysis and environmental sustainability compared to the reported one. In addition, the capacity of the method to detect low concentrations of NPZ and PHN official impurities highlights it as a promising one for impurity profiling of those drugs.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

BP:

British pharmacopeia

EHS:

Environmental, Health and Safety tool

ICH:

International Council for Harmonisation

NPZ:

Naphazoline HCl

PHN:

Pheniramine maleate

TLC:

Thin Layer Chromatography

USP:

United States Pharmacopeia

References

  1. Tantawy MA, Weshahy SA, Wadie M, Rezk MR. A novel HPLC-DAD method for simultaneous determination of alfuzosin and solifenacin along with their official impurities induced: via a stress stability study; investigation of their degradation kinetics. Anal Methods. 2020;12:3368–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sherma J. Thin-layer chromatography. In: Meyers Robert A, editor. Encycl Anal Chem. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. p. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meloun M, Syrovy T, Vrana A. The thermodynamic dissociation constants of ambroxol, antazoline, naphazoline, oxymetazoline and ranitidine by the regression analysis of spectrophotometric data. Talanta. 2004;62:511–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. USP 39 - NF 34. In: The United States Pharmacopeial. 2016.

  5. BP. British Pharmacopeia, The Stationary Office, London. 2019.

  6. Sayedel deen N, Hegazy M, Abdelkawy M, Abdelfatah R. Spectrophotometric, chemometric and chromatographic determination of naphazoline hydrochloride and chlorpheniramine maleate in the presence of naphazoline hydrochloride alkaline degradation product. Bull Fac Pharm Cairo Univ. 2013;51:57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Korany MA, Bedair MM, El-Gindy A. Analysis of diphenhydramine hydrochloride and naphazoline hydrochloride in presence of methylene blue in eye drops by second derivative spectrophotometry. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1990;16:1555–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khalil S. Analytical application of atomic emission and atomic absorption spectrometry for the determination of imidazoline derivatives based on formation of ion-associates with sodium cobaltinitrite and potassium ferricyanide. Mikrochim Acta. 1999;130:181–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Souri E, Amanlou M, Farsam H, Afshari A. A rapid derivative spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of naphazoline and antazoline in eye drops. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2006;54:119–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Casado-Terrones S, Fernandez-Sanchez JF, Canabate Diaz B, et al. A fluorescence optosensor for analyzing naphazoline in pharmaceutical preparations, comparison with other sensors. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2005;38:785–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goicoechea HC, Collado MS, Satuf ML, Olivieri AC. Complementary use of partial least-squares and artificial neural networks for the non-linear spectrophotometric analysis of pharmaceutical samples. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2002;374:460–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hemmateenejad B, Ghavami R, Miri R, Shamsipur M. Net analyte signal-based simultaneous determination of antazoline and naphazoline using wavelength region selection by experimental design-neural networks. Talanta. 2006;68:1222–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chocholous P, Satinsky D, Solich P. Fast simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of naphazoline nitrate and methylparaben by sequential injection chromatography. Talanta. 2006;70:408–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xia H, Wu HL, Gu HW, et al. Simultaneous determination of naphazoline and pyridoxine in eye drops using excitation-emission matrix fluorescence coupled with second-order calibration method based on alternating trilinear decomposition algorithm. Chinese Chem Lett. 2015;26:1446–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito T, Morita S, Kishiyama I, et al. Simultaneous determination of dibucaine and naphazoline in human serum by monolithic silica spin column extraction and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2008;872:186–90.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Korodi T, Dulavova M, Urban E, et al. A stability indicating HPLC method for the determination of naphazoline and its degradation product and methyl parahydroxybenzoate in pharmaceutical preparations. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 2014;37:1321–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang T, Chen N, Wang D, et al. A validated stability-indicating HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of pheniramine maleate and naphazoline hydrochloride in pharmaceutical formulations. Chem Cent J. 2014;8:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliveira TC, Freitas JM, Munoz RAA, Richter EM. Development of a novel versatile method for determination of two antihistamines in association with naphazoline using cathodically pretreated boron-doped diamond electrode. Electroanalysis. 2018;30:868–76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelani KM, Hegazy MA, Hassan AM, Tantawy MA. Determination of naphazoline HCl, pheniramine maleate and their official impurities in eye drops and biological fluid rabbit aqueous humor by a validated LC-DAD method. RSC Adv J. 2021;11:7051–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoang VD, Hue NT, Tho NH, Nguyen HMT. Simultaneous determination of chloramphenicol, dexamethasone and naphazoline in ternary and quaternary mixtures by RP-HPLC, derivative and wavelet transforms of UV ratio spectra. Spectrochim Acta - Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2015;139:20–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauer J, Krogh S. High-performance liquid chromatographic, stability indicating assay for disodium EDTA in ophthalmic preparations. J Chromatogr A. 1986;369:422–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sasa SI, Al-momani IF, Jalal IM. Determination of naphazoline nitrate and antazoline sulphate in pharmaceutical combinations by reversed-phase HPLC. Anal Lett. 1990;23:953–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruckmick SC, Marsh DF, Duong ST. Synthesis and identification of the primary degradation product in a commercial ophthalmic formulation using NMR, MS, and a stability-indicating HPLC method for antazoline and naphazoline. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84:502–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yesilada A, Gokhan N, Yilman MA, Ertan M. High performance liquid chromatographic identification of naphazoline and its degradation product in nasal preparations. Acta Pharm Turc. 1996;4:101–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ali A, Ahmed M, Farooq U, et al. Stability indicating UHPLC-PDA assay for simultaneous determination of antazoline hydrochloride and naphazoline hydrochloride in ophthalmic formulations. Acta Chim Slov. 2017;64:332–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chabenat C, Boucly P. Determination of naphazoline in rat plasma using column liquid chromatography with ultra violet detection. Biomed Chromatogr. 1992;6:241–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sidhu AS, Kennedy JM, Deeble S. General method for the analysis of pharmaceutical dosage forms by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1987;391:233–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marszall MP, Sroka WD, Balinowska A, et al. Ionic liquids as mobile phase additives for feasible assay of naphazoline in pharmaceutical formulation by HPTLC-UV-densitometric method. J Chromatogr Sci. 2013;51:560–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oliveira TDC, Freitas JM, Abarza Munoz RA, Richter EM. A batch injection analysis system with square-wave voltammetric detection for fast and simultaneous determination of naphazoline and zinc. Talanta. 2016;152:308–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Nour El-Dien FA, Mohamed GG, Frag EYZ, Mohamed ME-B. Modified screen printed and carbon paste ion selective electrodes for potentiometric determination of naphazoline hydrochloride in pure and pharmaceutical preparations. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:10266–81.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Marchesini A, Williner M, Mantovani V, et al. Simultaneous determination of naphazoline, diphenhydramine and phenylephrine in nasal solutions by capillary electrophoresis. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2003;31:39–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ribeiro MMAC, Oliveira TC, Batista AD, et al. A sub-minute electrophoretic method for simultaneous determination of naphazoline and zinc. J Chromatogr A. 2016;1472:134–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Meloun M, Ferencikova Z, Netolicka L, Vrana A. The thermodynamic dissociation constant of naphazoline by the regression analysis of potentiometric data. Cent Eur J Chem. 2011;9:66–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ghoreishi SM, Behpour M, Nabi M. A novel naphazoline-selective membrane sensor and its pharmaceutical applications. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2006;113:963–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yesilada A, Tozkoparan B, Gökhan N, et al. Development and validation of a capillary electrophoretic method for the determination of degradation product in naphazoline HCl bulk drug substance. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol. 1998;21:2575–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Koziol TR, Jacob JT, Achari RG. Ion-pair liquid chromatographic assay of decongestants and antihistamines. J Pharm Sci. 1979;68:1135–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Parente G, Pazzaglia M, Vincenzi C, Tosti A. Contact dermatitis from pheniramine maleate in eyedrops. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:338.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pandey AK, Dwivedi D. A validated titrimetric method for the determination oh pheniramine maleate in pure form and in their pharmaceutical formulation. Int Res J Pharm. 2017;8:138–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pereira-rosario R, El-Gizawy S, Perrin JH, Riley CM. Analysis of nasal solutions containing pheniramine hydrochloride and pheniramine maleate by high performance liquid chromatography on a cyclodextrin bonded stationary phase and diod array spectrophotometry. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1986;12:2443–65.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Abdel Fattah S, Kelany KO, El-zeany BA, El-tarras MF. Analysis of pheniramine maleate and colorpheniramine maleate via their Fe (III) Complexes. Anal Lett. 1987;20:1667–78.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Das Gupta V, Ghanekar AG. Quantitative determinations of codeine phosphate, guaifenesin, pheniramine maleate, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, and pyrilamine maleate in an expectorant by high-PRESSURE liquid chromatography. J Pharm Sci. 1977;66:895–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Ali I, Al-othman ZA, Al-warthan A, et al. Enantiomeric separation and simulation studies of pheniramine, oxybutynin, cetirizine, and brinzolamide chiral drugs on amylose-based columns. Chirality. 2014;26:136–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Prava R, Seru G, Sama JR, Sidhhanadham AS. Chiral liquid chromatographic method development and validation for seperation of pheniramine enantiomers. Indo Am J Pharm Sci. 2016;3:1521–33.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Caglar H, Buyuktuncel E. HPLC method development and validation: simultaneous determination of active ingredients in cough and cold pharmaceuticals. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;6:421–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Pirol O, Sukuroglu M, Ozden T. Simultaneous determination of paracetamol, phenylephrine hydrochloride, oxolamine citrate and chlorpheniramine maleate by HPLC in pharmaceutical dosage forms. E-J Chem. 2011;8:1275–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Jovanovic M, Stojanovic B, Rakic T, et al. Five different columns in the analysis of basic drugs in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography. Cent Eur J Chem. 2013;11:1150–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Louhaichi MR, Jebali S, Loueslati MH, et al. Simultaneous determination of peudoephdrine, pheniramine, guaifesnisin, pyrilamine, chlorpheniramine and dextromethorphan in cough and cold medicines by high performance liquid chromatography. Talanta. 2009;78:991–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rudolph D, Holkup L. HPLC determination and quantification of pheniramine and pyrilamine in over the counter cold medicines. Concordia Coll J Anal Chem. 2010;1(1):29–33.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wu H-L, Huang C-H, Chen S-H, Wu S-M. Chiral quantitation of pheniramine, chlorpheniramine, and brompheniramine maleates by capillary zone electrophoresis. J Chromatogr Sci. 1999;37:24–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1). International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. 2014.

  51. Koller G, Fischer U, Hungerbühler K. Assessing safety, health, and environmental impact early during process development. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie990669i.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Fekry RA, Kelani KM, Fayez YM, Tantawy MA. Comparative validated chromatographic methods for the simultaneous determination of caffeine, codeine, paracetamol along with the related compound “p-aminophenol” in tablets. J Planar Chromatogr - Mod TLC. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-022-00150-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tantawy MA, Wahba IA, Saad SS, Ramadan NK. Two validated chromatographic methods for determination of ciprofloxacin HCl, one of its specified impurities and fluocinolone acetonide in newly approved otic solution. J Chromatogr Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/bmab110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Variyar PS, Chatterjee S, Sharma A. Fundamentals and theory of HPTLC-based separation. In: Srivastava MM, editor. High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (HPTLC). Berlin: Springer; 2011. p. 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Eva Pharma Pharmaceutical Company for donating us the pure NPZ and PHN sample.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KMK; Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft. MAH: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition, Writing—review & editing. AMH; Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. MAT; Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud A. Tantawy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kelani, K.M., Hegazy, M.A., Hassan, A.M. et al. A green TLC densitometric method for the simultaneous detection and quantification of naphazoline HCl, pheniramine maleate along with three official impurities. BMC Chemistry 16, 24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00819-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00819-9

Keywords

  • Naphazoline
  • Pheniramine
  • Impurities
  • TLC
  • EHS tool