Skip to main content
Download PDF

Synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols) and evaluation of their antioxidant and anticancer activities

BMC Chemistry volume 15, Article number: 38 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pyrazoles have attracted particular attention due to the diverse biological activities associated with this heterocyclic system, and some have been shown to be cytotoxic to several human cell lines. Several drugs currently on the market have this heterocycle as the key structural motif, and some have been approved for the treatment of different types of cancer.

Results

4,4ʹ-(Arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) derivatives 3a–q were synthetized by a three components reaction of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone (1) with various benzaldehydes 2 catalyzed by sodium acetate at room temperature. The structures of all synthesized compounds were characterized by physicochemical properties and spectral means (IR and NMR) and were evaluated for their radical scavenging activity by DPPH assay and tested in vitro on colorectal RKO carcinoma cells in order to determine their cytotoxic properties. All 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) derivatives 3a–q were synthetized in high to excellent yield, and pure products were isolated by simple filtration. All compounds have good radical scavenging activity, and half of them are more active than ascorbic acid used as standard.

Conclusion

Several derivatives proved to be cytotoxic in the RKO cell line. In particular, compound 3i proved to be a very potent scavenger with an IC50 of 6.2 ± 0.6 µM and exhibited an IC50 of 9.9 ± 1.1 μM against RKO cell. Autophagy proteins were activated as a survival mechanism, whereas the predominant pathway of death was p53-mediated apoptosis.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Heterocycles are common structural units in marketed drugs and in targets in the drug discovery process. Nitrogen-containing rings play an especially important role in drug development because of their wide variety of therapeutic and pharmacological properties [1]. Pyrazoles and their derivatives have attracted particular attention because they have a wide variety of biological activities [2, 3], and several drugs currently on the market, have the pyrazole ring as the key structural motif [4]. Some pyrazole derivatives have been demonstrated to be cytotoxic on several human cell lines [5,6,7,8], and, at this time, several drugs that have pyrazoles in their structure have been approved for the treatment of different types of cancer (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Approved anti-cancer pyrazole drugs

Full size image

Edaravone, 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one, (1) is a free radical scavenger approved for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral scleorosis (ALS) [9]. The compound is known to have preventive effects on myocardial injury following ischemia and reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction and in brain edema after ischemia and reperfusion injury in animal models and in stroke patients [10]. There are several epidemiological studies related to the incidence of ALS and the development of cancer, that have reported the identification of a set of genes or signaling cascades involved in both diseases [11]. Also, it is well-known that many natural and synthesized antioxidants possessing phenolic hydroxyl groups have improved antioxidant activities by virtue of their abilities to react with free radicals [12], and studies carried out on flavones have shown that there is a relationship between antioxidant and anticancer activity [13].

Michael addition of an aromatic aldehyde 2 with an arylpyrazolone, obtained by the Knoevenagel reaction, allows an easy synthesis of 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene) bis (1H-pyrazol-5-ols) 3. These reactions can be done separately [14, 15] or in one step, either by a reaction of pseudo-five [16,17,18] or pseudo-three-components [19]. In practice, most of the reported synthetic routes consist of a one-step condensation of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one (1) with different aromatic aldehydes 2, and most of the reactions used different types of catalyst. These edaravone derivatives incorporating hydroxyl groups in their structures, represent attractive targets for further study, however, only a few reports of biological activity were found in the literature, and the evaluation of compounds with hydroxyl groups is limited to only a few examples [20,21,22,23], and there is no report of cytotoxicity studies against cancer cells.

Results and discussion

Chemistry

The 4,4'-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) 3 were synthesized using NaOAc as catalyst following the scheme depicted in Scheme 1, using 70% EtOH as solvent at room temperature. To find the optimal conditions, the reaction between 2b and 2 equivalents of 1 was chosen as a model, showing 10% acetate gave the best catalytic effect.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Synthesis of 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) 3a–q

Full size image

With the optimized conditions, the scope of the reaction was studied using various substituted benzaldehydes 2a–q bearing either electron-withdrawing or electron-donating groups to give the corresponding 4,4ʹ-bis-(arilmetilen)bis(1-fenil-3-metil-1H-pirazol-5-ol) derivatives 3a–q in good to excellent yield as pure products by simple filtration. The spectroscopic data and melting points of compounds previously reported were in agreement with literature values (see Table 1 and “Experimental” section).

Table 1 Preparation of 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols) derivatives 3a-q catalyzed by 10% NaOAc at room temperature, DPPH scavenging activity and cytotoxic activity against RKO cell line
Full size table

As expected, the time of the reaction with aldehydes bearing electron-withdrawing groups, independent of their location on the ring, were shorter than those with electron-donating groups, except with 2a, which is six times shorter than benzaldehyde (entry 1). This could be due to the intramolecular hydrogen bonding in 2a which enhances the reactivity of the aldehyde. When this hydrogen bond is lost, by protecting or changing the position of the hydroxyl group, the reaction time is higher. However, it is not clear the reason of the reduction of the activity observed in 3f.

Biological activity

All synthesized compounds were evaluated for antioxidant activity by the N,N-diphenyl-Nʹ-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay as shown in Table 1. All compounds have good radical scavenging activity and half of them are more active than ascorbic acid used as standard. Compound 3c has the lowest activity (20.9 µM) while compound 3i proved to be a very potent scavenger with an IC50 of 6.2 µM. In fact, most bispyrazoles had better radical scavenging activity than 1, and only 3c, 3f, 3k, and 3l are less potent scavengers.

Theoretical calculation of 1 shows that an H-atom abstraction rather than electron-transfer reaction is involved in the radical-scavenging process [24, 25]. Because in structure 3 the enol tautomer is more stable than the keto form, it would be expected that this hydrogen abstraction occurs on the hydroxyl group. Theoretical calculations of the enol tautomer of 1 show lower dissociation energy of this bond, so the abstraction of this hydrogen would be the most important for the scavenger properties of the edaravone [26].

The higher antioxidant activity of 3i could suggest that the abstraction of the phenolic hydrogens instead of the enolic hydrogens would be more important for the stabilization of radicals, since the presence of the ortho-dihydroxy system is known to increase the stabilization of radicals [27]. This stabilization, provided by intramolecular hydrogen bonding in the radical formed has been confirmed by theoretical calculation in catechol derivatives [28]. Due to steric factors, the structure of 3 is not coplanar. Nonetheless, the results suggest that the conjugation of the radical is not restricted only to the pyrazol rings, since a contribution in the stabilization of the radical due to the aryl moiety is observed. Furthermore, both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups stabilize the radical, however, it is not clear how this stabilization occurs.

All derivatives were tested in vitro on colorectal RKO carcinoma cells in order to determine their cytotoxic properties (Table 1). Cells were exposed to each compound at five increasing concentrations for 48 h and their viability was monitored through MTS assay; as expected, dose-dependent effects were observed. For compounds 3a and 3b the observed IC50 was greater than 100 µM, however, the vast majority are below 50 µM, (3c, 3d, 3e, 3g, 3i, 3l–3q), the compound with the highest cytotoxic activity was 3i with an IC50 of 9.9 µM.

The MTS test is a proliferation test, but it does not distinguish between cytostatic and cytotoxic effect. To understand how the most powerful compound of the derivatives is acting, in this case 3i, the trypan blue dye exclusion test was performed at 24 and 48 h. As indicated in Fig. 2, both cell numbers are seen to decrease in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A); observing a decrease in the number of cells that could be related to a cytostatic effect. Thus, a decrease in cell viability related to the cytotoxic effect is also observed (Fig. 2B), the same as they agree with the morphological changes observed in Fig. 2C.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Cytotoxic effect of compound 3i. RKO cell line were exposed to 10–70 µM of 3i for 24 and 48 h and evaluated through Trypan Blue dye exclusion assay. A cell population, and B percentages of cell viability. The tests for significance were limited to ANOVA-Dunnett post-test, *p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.0001 vs. control. C Cell morphology after exposure at 30, 40, and 50 µM; Horizontal bar in bottom figure = 50 µm

Full size image

Studied with the proteins involved in both apoptosis and autophagia, and p53 and p21 proteins controlling cell proliferation and death response were carried out [29]. Since cell death pathways must be examined prior to the morphological changes, a shorter time (24 h) and higher doses were chosen (30, 40 and 50 µM). Figure 3A shows that p53 increases significatively in a dose-dependent manner, indicating that this protein could be involved in the induced cell death process [30] by compound 3i. A similar effect was observed in A2780 (ovarian adenocarcinoma), P388 (leukemia), and A549 (lung carcinoma) human cell lines [31, 32] after treatment with pyrazole derivatives. One of the major targets for p53 is p21, a protein related to cell cycle arrest; according to our results, p21 increases significantly in all doses tested (Fig. 3A, D); explaining therefore the inhibition of cell grow (cytostatic effect).

Fig. 3
figure 3

RKO cell line was exposed to different doses of compound 3i for 24 h. Expression of protein: A p53 and p21 protein. B Pro-autophagic LC3 II and p62. C Pro-apoptotic proteins: Bax, Bcl-2, cleaved caspase-3, and PARP-1. Actin was used as control. D Quantification expression protein. The tests for significance were limited to ANOVA-Dunnet post-test: ∗ p < 0.01, ∗  ∗ p < 0.001, ∗  ∗  ∗ p < 0.0001 vs. control. Full-length gels are presented in Additional file 1: Fig. S1

Full size image

Autophagy pathway activation has been found to be induced by pyrazol derivatives in A549 lung cancer cell [33]. Therefore, pro-autophagic proteins were also studied (Fig. 3B, D). LC3 I is converted into its active form LC3 II at the beginning of the autophagy, while p62 is degraded in the last phase of this cell death pathway [34]. Our results showed a significant increase in LC3 II in the highest concentration, whereas no changes in p62 were detected. Accordingly, in our study, compound 3i is able to induce autophagy as a protective mechanism [35]

It is well-known that p53 upregulates Bax to promote the intrinsic apoptosis pathway, which ends in the activation of caspase-3 [30]. Consequently, a significant increase in Bax upregulation was detected, together with the caspase-3 activation mostly in the highest concentration; whereas no changes were observed in the regulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2 (Fig. 3C, D). This later protein has been found to interact with Beclin-1 to form the Bcl-2-Beclin-1 complex, which inhibits autophagy and allows the activation of apoptosis [36], thus explaining the observation that there is no variation in Bcl-2 expression and the lack of activation of autophagy. Moreover, a significant increase in Bax/Bcl-2 ratio was observed; indicating therefore that the RKO cell line is susceptible to apoptosis after treatment [37]. One of the multiple substrates of caspase-3 is PARP-1, a well-known apoptotic biomarker, which was also found significantly cleaved in the highest concentration (Fig. 3C, D). All these findings therefore show that compound 3i is able to induce apoptosis on RKO cell line, mediated by p53.

Finally, the analysis of the substituents shows that compounds bearing electron-withdrawing groups, independent of their location on the ring, are more active than compounds with electron-donating substituents, except for 3i (IC50 = 9.9 ± 1.1 μM) which is the most active compound despite having two hydroxyl groups. The ortho position of these hydroxyls would be responsible for the high activity observed since it has been reported that catechol compounds with hydroxyl residues ortho to each other are susceptible to oxidation leading to cell apoptosis, mainly due to generation of quinone through autoxidation and subsequent induction of p53 and caspase-3 activation [38].

Conclusion

In this work, 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols) 3a–q were synthesized at room temperature using NaOAc as a catalyst in high to excellent yields and pure products were isolated by simple filtration. Most compounds show better DPPH radical scavenging activities than edaravone 1, and some compounds show moderate cytotoxicity against RKO cell. In both activities the most potent compound was 3i, with cytotoxic activity to the RKO cell line present in a dose and time-depended manner. Indeed, this compound was able to induce the apoptotic cell death pathway.

Experimental

Chemistry

All solvents and reagents were from Sigma Aldrich and used without further purification. All melting points are uncorrected and were determined on a Büchi Melting Point M-560 apparatus. FTIR spectra were recorded by a Perkin Elmer FTIR Spectrum One by using ATR system (4000–650 cm−1). The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on a JEOL ECA 400 MHz or Bruker Advance 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a z-gradient, triple-resonance (1H, 13C, 15N) cryoprobe, using DMSO-d6 as solvent. The 19F-NMR spectra were acquired on an Oxford Instruments Pulsar benchtop NMR 60 MHz Spectrometer. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm with tetramethylsilane (TMS, δ = 0 ppm) as an internal reference for protons and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, δ = − 75.39 ppm) for fluorine. Accurate mass data were obtained using a Waters (Waltham, MA) model LCT Premiere time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometer. Reactions were monitored by TLC on silica gel using ethyl acetate/hexane mixtures as a solvent and compounds visualized by UV lamp. The reported yields are for the purified material and are not optimized.

General procedure for the synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols) 3a–q

To a solution of 0.4 mmol aldehyde 2a–q and 0.8 mmol pyrazole 1 in 4 mL of 70% EtOH at room temperature, 40.2 μL of 1 M NaOAc were added and the mixture was stirred until the reaction was complete (see Table 1). Water was added to obtain 50% EtOH and the mixture was filtered, washed with 50% EtOH and dried to obtain pure product.

4,4ʹ-[(2-Hydroxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3a

Yield 98% as a white solid; mp 219.5–220.6 °C [Lit. 218–220 [39]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 14.30 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.38 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 9.51 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.56 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 6.97 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.75 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 5.18 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.29 (s, 6 H, CH3).

4,4ʹ-(Phenylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3b

Yield 97% as a white solid; mp 159.5–161.1 °C [Lit. 161–163 [40]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.94 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.44 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.71 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.31–7.21 (m, 6 H, Ar–H), 7.20–7.14 (m, 1 H, Ar–H), 4.96 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.32 (br. s., 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(2-Nitrophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3c

Yield 95% as a yellow solid; mp 210.0–211.0 °C [Lit. 218–220 [41]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.35 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.60 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.72 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.62 (m, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.48 (m, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 5.43 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.24 (br. s., 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(3-Nitrophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3d

Yield 95% as a white solid; mp 150.7–152.0 °C [Lit. 150–152 [42]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.87 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.64 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 8.09 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 8.08 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.70 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.61 (t, J = 8.6, 7.9 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.4 Hz,, 2 H, Ar–H), 5.15 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.35 (br. s., 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(3-Fluorophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3e

Yield quantitative as a white solid; mp 178.0–179.0 °C [Lit. 183–184 [40]]; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.70 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.29–7.36 (m, 1H, Ar–H), 7.21—7.28 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.10 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.98–7.04 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 4.97 (s, 1H, CH), 2.31 (br. s., 6H, CH3).

4,4'-[(3-Hydroxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3f

Yield 98% as a white solid; mp 165.0–167.0 °C [Lit. 164–166 [43]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.95 (br. s., 1H, OH), 9.21 (s, 1H, Ar–H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.68 (br. s, 1H, OH), 6.65 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 6.55 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.5 Hz, 1H, Ar–H), 4.86 (s, 1H), 2.30 (br. s., 6H).

4,4'-[(3-Hydroxy-4-nitrophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3g

Yield 99% as a yellow solid; mp 202.0–204.0 °C (d); FTIR (cm−1): 3616 (OH), 1604 (C=C), 1600 (C=N), 1577 (NO2), 1499 (C=C), 1353 (OH), 1331 (NO2), 1233 (OH), 1120 (C–OH); 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.84 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 10.84 (s, 1 H, OH), 7.83 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.04 (s, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.81 (dd, J = 1.9, 8.5 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 5.00 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.33 (br. s., 6 H, CH3); 13C-NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 152.1, 150.5, 146.3, 134.7, 129.0, 125.7, 125.2, 120.6, 118.7, 118.4, 117.5, 33.0; ESI–MS m/z 497.8 [M]+.

4,4'-[(3-Hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3h

Yield 91% as a white solid; mp 200.0–202.0 °C [Lit. 201–203 [44]]; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.90 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.38 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 8.82 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.71 (d, J = 8.23 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.68 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 6.86 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 6.79 (d, J = 8.78 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.69 (d, J = 1.65 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.59 (dd, J = 8.23, 1.65 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 4.83 (s, 1 H, CH), 3.70 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 2.30 (br. s., 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3i

Yield 93% as a cream solid; mp 182.7–184.0 °C; FTIR (cm−1): 3206 (OH), 1598(C=N), 1568 (C=C), 1501 (C=C), 1368 (OH), 1291 (OH), 1191 (C-O); 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.90 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.34 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 8.74 (s, 1 H, OH), 8.60 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.72 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 6.66 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 6.47 (dd, J = 1.6, 8.2 Hz, 1 H, Ar–H), 4.80 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.29 (br. s., 6 H, CH3); 13C-NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 146.2, 144.8, 143.4, 132.9, 128.9, 125.5, 120.5, 117.8, 115.2, 114.8, 32.4, 11.6; HRMS (TOF ES +) m/z calcd for C27H25N4O4 (M+H)+: 469.1870; found: 469.1876.

4,4'-[(4-Hydroxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3j

Yield 97% as a white solid; mp 217.2–218.9 °C [Lit. 214–216 [45]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.93 (br. s., 1H, OH), 9.17 (s, 1H, OH), 7.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 6.65 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 4.84 (s, 1H, CH), 2.29 (br. s., 6H, CH3).

4,4'-[(4-Methoxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3k

Yield 92% as a white solid; mp 176.0–177.0 °C [Lit. 176–177 [46]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.92 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 12.39 (br. s., 1 H, OH), 7.70 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.3, 7.9 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.16 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 4.89 (s, 1 H, CH), 3.70 (s, 3 H, OCH3), 2.30 (br. s., 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(4-Nitrophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3l

Yield 97% as a yellow solid; mp 218.0–219.0 °C [Lit. 219–220 [47]]; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 8.17 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.69 (dd, J = 1.0, 8.6 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 7.45 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H, Ar–H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2 H, Ar–H), 5.13 (s, 1 H, CH), 2.34 (s, 6 H, CH3).

4,4'-[(4-Fluorophenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3m

Yield 87% as a white solid; mp 183.8–185.8 °C [Lit. 181–183 [48]]; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.59—7.65 (m, 4H, Ar–H), 7.42 (dd, J = 8.3, 7.4 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.06 (t, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 4.91 (s, 1H, CH), 2.27 (s, 6H, CH3).

Methyl 4-[bis(5-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methyl]benzoate 3n

Yield quantitative as a white solid; mp 217.2–218.7 °C¸ FTIR (cm−1): 1720 (C=O), 1595 (C=N), 1569 (C=C), 1499 (C=C), 1286 (C-O), 1118 (C-O); 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 7.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.29 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 4.80 (s, 1H, CH), 3.86 (s, 3H, COOCH3), 2.12 (s, 6H, CH3); 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3) δ: 167.2, 146.8, 146.1, 129.9, 129.1, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1, 127.5, 126.4, 121.4, 52.2, 34.1, 12.0; ESI–MS m/z 494.8 [M]+.

4,4'-[(4-Trifluoromethylphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3o

Yield 96% as a white solid; mp 203.0–205.0 °C; FTIR (cm−1): 1600 (C=N), 1583 (C=C), 1500 (C=C), 1320 (CF3), 1115 (CF3); 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.88 (s, 1H, OH), 7.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, CH), 2.33 (s, 6H, CH3); 13C-NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 147.1, 146.3, 128.9, 128.1, 126.7 (q, J = 31.5 Hz), 125.7 (m), 125.1 (q, J = 4.0 Hz), 124.5 (q, J = 271.9 Hz), 120.6, 33.0, 11.6; 19F-NMR (56.17 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: − 60.12 (s, CF3); ESI–MS m/z 504.8 [M]+.

4,4'-[(4-Trifluoromethoxyphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3p

Yield quantitative as a white solid; mp 174.5–176.0 °C; FTIR (cm−1): 1596 (C=N), 1579 (C=C), 1501 (C=C), 1253 (C–OCF3), 1226 (CF3), 1167 (CF3); 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 7.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 5.00 (s, 1H, CH), 2.32 (br. s., 6H, CH3); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 147.1, 146.8, 141.9, 137.4, 137.2, 129.5, 129.4, 126.4, 121.2, 33.0, 11.8; 19F-NMR (56.17 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: − 56.02 (s, OCF3); ESI–MS m/z 520.8 [M]+.

4,4'-[(4-Thiomethylphenyl)methylene]bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol) 3q

Yield 60% as a white solid; mp 209.1–211.3 °C [Lit. 205–207 [49]]; 1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ: 13.91 (br. s., 1H, OH), 7.70 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H, Ar–H), 7.24 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, Ar–H), 7.18 (s, 4H, Ar–H), 4.91 (s, 1H, CH), 2.42 (s, 3H, SCH3), 2.31 (br. s., 6H, CH3).

Biological evaluation

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The stock solutions of the compounds was prepared by dissolving 3a–q in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) to a concentration of 4 mg/mL. The solution was, diluted with methanol until a concentration of 400 µg/mL was obtained and then used immediately.

The experimental procedure was adapted from the literature [50]. Briefly, 100 µL of a 0.2 mM methanol solution of DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical were added to 100 µL of methanolic solutions of 3a–q prepared as serial two-fold dilutions from the stock solution in 96-well microfilter plates. Standards and edaravone were also prepared in the same concentrations. The mixture was incubated in dark at room temperature for 30 min and the absorbance was read at 515 nm on a Cytattion 5 (BioTek) spectrophotometer.

The % DPPH scavenging activity was then calculated by using the following formula:

$$\% {\text{DPPH}}\;{\text{scavenging}} = 100*\left[ {\frac{{\left( {{\text{A}}_{{{\text{sample}} + {\text{DPPH}}}} - {\text{A}}_{{\text{sample blank}}} } \right)}}{{\left( {{\text{A}}_{{{\text{DPPH}}}} - {\text{A}}_{{{\text{solvent}}}} } \right)}}} \right]$$

The antioxidant activity of the compound was expressed as IC50, which is defined as the concentration that could scavenge 50% of the DPPH free radical. The IC50 values were calculated in GraphPad Prism 8.1.1 (GraphPad Software, Corp.) The results are given as a mean ± standard deviation (SD) of experiments done in triplicate.

Cell culture

For biological studies, a human colorectal carcinoma RKO cell line (donated by Dra. Patricia Ostrosky, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Departamento de Genética y Toxicología Ambiental, UNAM), with wild type p53 was used. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with FBS 10% (Sigma Aldrich, USA), glutamine 2 mM (GIBCO-Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), streptomycin 0.1 mg/mL, penicillin 100 U/mL, and amphotericin B 0.25 µg/mL; and maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Derivatives were dissolved in DMSO at a stock concentration of 20 mM. The final concentration of DMSO (< 1%, v/v) did not affect the cell growth in the different experiments performed.

Cytotoxic assay

The effect of each compound on cell proliferation was evaluated by the MTS metabolic viability assay, measuring mitochondrial activity of live cells. For this purpose, 2 × 103 cells in 100 µL per well were seeded in triplicate in 96-well plates. Twenty-four hours after seeding, cells were exposed to each one of the derivatives at increasing concentrations (5–250 µM) and incubated for 48 h. Later, 20 µL of Cell Titer 96 Aqueous One Solution cell proliferation reagent (Promega, USA) was added to each well containing the cells 4 h before finishing the treatment. Then, the absorbance was measured with a microplate spectrophotometer (Epoch 2—BioTek, USA) at 492 nm. Data obtained from untreated cells (control) were considered as 100% of the viability to normalize the absorbance of treated samples.

Trypan Blue dye exclusion assay was also performed to determine the cell number and viability after exposure to compound 3i. Briefly: 3 × 104 cells in 2 mL per well were seeded in a 6-well plate; after 24 h, cells were exposed to compound 3i at 10–70 µM and incubated for additional 24 and 48 h. Supernatant from wells was recovered independently, cells were then trypsinized, collected, and mixed with the previously recovered medium. After centrifugation, pellets were re-suspended in 1 mL of fresh medium. Cell suspension was mixed with Trypan Blue 0.4% (GIBCO-Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) in a 1:1 proportion and then counted applying a hemocytometer. Viable and non-viable (stained) cells were counted in a light microscopy (Nikon, USA).

For morphological analysis, 5 × 104 cells/mL were seeded in 3.5-cm diameter Petri dishes. After 24 h of incubation, cells were exposed to compound 3i at three representative doses: 30, 40 and 50 µM, for 24 and 48 h. Subsequently, cell morphology was observed using a light microscope (Axioskop 2 plus—Zeiss, Germany) equipped with a 40× objective. Images were then acquired with a SCA1300-32FM digital camera (Basler Inc., Germany).

Western blot analysis

Western blot analyses were performed in order to determine the induced cell death pathway by derivatives. According to cytotoxic effect, three concentrations (30, 40 and 50 µM) were administrated to RKO cell line for 24 h. As positive controls, cells were simultaneously exposed for 10 min to UV irradiation (Osram, G30T8, 30 W Germicidal UV-C Lamp, 254 nm) for apoptosis induction or for 1 h to PBS for starvation-induced autophagy [51]. As follows, proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE (7–15%) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (IPVH00010, Immobilon-P, 0.45 µm, EMD/Millipore, Billerica, USA), and then incubated with primary antibodies: p53 (sc-81168), p21 (sc-817), SQSTM1/p62 (sc-48402), β-actin (sc-58673) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), PARP (#9542), caspase-3 (#6962), Bax (#2774), Bcl-2 (#15071) LC3A/B (#12741) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), followed by secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked (#7076) and anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked (#7074) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA). Immunoreactive bands were monitored using Immobilon Crescendo, or Forte, Western HRP Substrate (Millipore-Merck, KGaA, Germany).

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was performed independently at least three times and data were reported as the means ± SEM, as evidenced in each figure. Significant data were obtained with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Dunnett post-test. Samples exposed to derivatives, Doxorrubicin or UV or starvation condition were compared to the control considering a p < 0.05 to be statistically significant. Statistical analyses were realized in GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, USA).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its additional information file].

Abbreviations

FTIR:

Fourier-transform infrared

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

DPPH:

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picryl-hydrazyl-hydrate

RKO:

Human colorectal carcinoma cell line

ALS:

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

NaOAc:

Sodium acetate

EtOH:

Ethanol

IC50 :

Half maximal inhibitory concentration/median inhibitory concentration

µM:

Micromolar

Mp:

Melting point

min:

Minutes

Quant:

Quantitative

MTS:

3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

p53:

Tumor protein p53

p21:

Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1

A2780:

Human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line

P388:

Human leukemia cell line

A549:

Human lung carcinoma cell line

LC3 II:

Microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3

LC3 I:

Cytosolic form of LC3

p62:

Ubiquitin-binding protein p62

Bax:

Bcl-2-Like Protein 4

Bcl-2:

B-cell lymphoma 2

PARP-1:

Poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1

ATR:

Attenuated total refection

DMSO:

Dimethyl sulfoxide

TMS:

Tetramethylsilane

TOF:

Time of flight

TLC:

Thin layer chromatography

UV:

Ultraviolet

HRMS:

High-resolution mass spectrometry

ES+:

Positive electrospray ionization

RPMI:

Cell culture media Roswell Park Memorial Institute

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

SDS-PAGE:

Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PVDF:

Polyvinylidene difluoride

SQSTM1/p62:

Sequestosome-1

IgG:

Immunoglobulin G

HRP:

Horseradish peroxidase

SEM:

Standard error of the mean

References

  1. 1.

    Gomtsyan A (2012) Heterocycles in drugs and drug discovery. Chem Heterocycl Compd 48:7–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10593-012-0960-z

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Pandey A, Dewangan D, Verma S et al (2011) Synthesis of Schiff bases of 2-amino-5-aryl-1, 3, 4-thiadiazole And its Analgesic, Anti- Inflammatory, Anti-Bacterial and Anti- Tubercular Activity. Int J ChemTech Res 3:178–184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Halim KNM, Ramadan SK, Rizk SA, El-Hashash MA (2020) Synthesis, DFT study, molecular docking and insecticidal evaluation of some pyrazole-based tetrahydropyrimidine derivatives. Synth Commun 50:1159–1175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2020.1720739

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Naim MJ, Alam O, Nawaz F et al (2016) Current status of pyrazole and its biological activities. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 8:2–17. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.171694

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mohamed MS, Abdelhamid AO, Almutairi FM et al (2018) Induction of apoptosis by pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyridazine derivative in lung cancer cells via disruption of Bcl-2/Bax expression balance. Bioorg Med Chem 26:623–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2017.12.026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ramadan SK, Halim KNM, Rizk SA, El-Hashash MA (2020) Cytotoxic activity and density functional theory studies of some 1,3-diphenylpyrazolyltetrahydropyrimidine derivatives. J Iran Chem Soc 17:1575–1589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-020-01880-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ramadan SK, El-Ziaty AK, Ali RS (2021) Synthesis, antiproliferative activity, and molecular docking of some N-heterocycles bearing a pyrazole scaffold against liver and breast tumors. J Heterocycl Chem 58:290–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Halim KNM, Rizk SA, El-Hashash MA, Ramadan SK (2021) Straightforward synthesis, antiproliferative screening, and density functional theory study of some pyrazolylpyrimidine derivatives. J Heterocycl Chem 58:636–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.4204

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bailly C, Hecquet PE, Kouach M et al (2020) Chemical reactivity and uses of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone (PMP), also known as edaravone. Bioorganic Med Chem 28:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2020.115463

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Higashi Y, Jitsuiki D, Chayama K, Yoshizumi M (2006) Edaravone (3-methyl-1-phenyl-2-pyrazolin-5-one), a novel free radical scavenger, for treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Recent Pat Cardiovasc Drug Discov 1:85–93. https://doi.org/10.2174/157489006775244191

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yamamoto I, Azuma Y, Yamaguchi M (2019) Cancer-related genes and ALS. Front Biosci 24:1241–1258. https://doi.org/10.2741/4777

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Murias M, Jäger W, Handler N et al (2005) Antioxidant, prooxidant and cytotoxic activity of hydroxylated resveratrol analogues: Structure-activity relationship. Biochem Pharmacol 69:903–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2004.12.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Grigalius I, Petrikaite V (2017) Relationship between antioxidant and anticancer activity of trihydroxyflavones. Molecules 22:2169. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22122169

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hamama WS (2001) Pyrazolones as versatile precursors for the synthesis of fused and binary heterocycles. Synth Commun 31:1335–1345. https://doi.org/10.1081/SCC-100104042

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li X-L, Wang Y-M, Tian B et al (1998) The solid-state michael addition of 3-methyl-1-phenyl-5-pyrazolone. J Heterocycl Chem 35:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.5570350124

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hasaninejad A, Kazerooni MR, Zare A (2013) Room-temperature, catalyst-free, one-pot pseudo-five-component synthesis of 4,4-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol)s under ultrasonic irradiation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 1:679–684. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc400081c

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Noruzian F, Olyaei A, Hajinasiri R, Sadeghpour M (2019) Guanidine hydrochloride catalyzed efficient one-pot pseudo five-component synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) in water. Synth Commun 49:2717–2724. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2019.1643483

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Moosavi-Zare AR, Zolfigol MA, Noroozizadeh E et al (2016) Cyclocondensation-Knoevenagel–Michael Domino reaction of phenyl hydrazine, acetoacetate derivatives and aryl aldehydes over acetic acid functionalized ionic liquid. Res Chem Intermed 42:4759–4772. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-015-2317-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kauthale SS, Tekale SU, Jadhav KM, Pawar RP (2016) Ethylene glycol promoted catalyst-free pseudo three-component green synthesis of bis(coumarin)s and bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ol)s. Mol Divers 20:763–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-016-9673-z

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Diwan F, Shaikh M, Farooqui M (2018) Lemon juice catalyzed efficient one-pot synthesis, antioxidant and antimicrobial evaluation of bispyrazolyl methanes. Chem Biol Interface 8:255–268

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Mahajan PS, Nikam MD, Khedkar V et al (2017) An Organocatalyzed efficient one-pot synthesis, biological evaluation, and molecular docking studies of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis-(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols). J Heterocycl Chem 54:1109–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhet.2681

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Yang X, Zhang P, Zhou Y et al (2012) Synthesis and Antioxidant Activities of Novel 4,4′-Arylmethylene-bis(1H-pyrazole-5-ol)s from Lignin. Chinese J Chem 30:670–674. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjoc.201280009

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Bhavanarushi S, Kanakaiah V, Bharath G et al (2014) Synthesis and antibacterial activity of 4,4′-(aryl or alkyl methylene)-bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ol) derivatives. Med Chem Res 23:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00044-013-0623-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wang LF, Zhang HY (2003) A theoretical investigation on DPPH radical-scavenging mechanism of edaravone. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 13:3789–3792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2003.07.016

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Borges RS, Queiroz AN, Mendes APS et al (2012) Density Functional theory (DFT) study of edaravone derivatives as antioxidants. Int J Mol Sci 13:7594–7606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13067594

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Queiroz AN, Mendes APS, Leal MS et al (2010) Tautomerism and radical-scavenging activity of edaravone by DFT methods. J Comput Theor Nanosci 7:153–156. https://doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2010.1339

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Foti M, Piattelli M, Baratta MT, Ruberto G (1996) Flavonoids, coumarins, and cinnamic acids as antioxidants in a micellar system. structure−activity relationship. J Agric Food Chem 44:497–501. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf950378u

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wright JS, Johnson ER, DiLabio GA (2001) Predicting the activity of phenolic antioxidants: theoretical method, analysis of substituent effects, and application to major families of antioxidants. J Am Chem Soc 123:1173–1183. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja002455u

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Collavin L, Lunardi A, Del Sal G (2010) P53-family proteins and their regulators: hubs and spokes in tumor suppression. Cell Death Differ 17:901–911. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2010.35

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA et al (2018) Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ 25:486–541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Polkam N, Ramaswamy VR, Rayam P et al (2016) Synthesis, molecular properties prediction and anticancer, antioxidant evaluation of new edaravone derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:2562–2568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.03.024

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Marković V, Erić S, Juranić ZD et al (2011) Synthesis, antitumor activity and QSAR studies of some 4-aminomethylidene derivatives of edaravone. Bioorg Chem 39:18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2010.10.003

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zheng LW, Li Y, Ge D et al (2010) Synthesis of novel oxime-containing pyrazole derivatives and discovery of regulators for apoptosis and autophagy in A549 lung cancer cells. Bioorganic Med Chem Lett 20:4766–4770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.06.121

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Saito T, Kuma A, Sugiura Y et al (2019) Autophagy regulates lipid metabolism through selective turnover of NCoR1. Nat Commun 10:1567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08829-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Guamán-Ortiz LM, Bailon-Moscoso N, Morocho V et al (2019) Onoseriolide, from Hedyosmum racemosum, induces cytotoxicity and apoptosis in human colon cancer cells. Nat Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2019.1690485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Giansanti V, Torriglia A, Scovassi AI (2011) Conversation between apoptosis and autophagy: Is it your turn or mine? Apoptosis 16:321–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-011-0589-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Du L, Fei Z, Song S, Wei N (2017) Antitumor activity of Lobaplatin against esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through caspase-dependent apoptosis and increasing the Bax/Bcl-2 ratio. Biomed Pharmacother 95:447–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.08.119

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Haque ME, Asanuma M, Higashi Y et al (2003) Apoptosis-inducing neurotoxicity of dopamine and its metabolites via reactive quinone generation in neuroblastoma cells. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 1619:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4165(02)00440-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Phatangare KR, Padalkar VS, Gupta VD et al (2012) Phosphomolybdic acid: an efficient and recyclable solid acid catalyst for the synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols). Synth Commun 42:1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2010.539759

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zolfigol MA, Ayazi-Nasrabadi R, Baghery S (2015) Synthesis and characterization of two novel biological-based nano organo solid acids with urea moiety and their catalytic applications in the synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ol), coumarin-3-carboxylic acid and cinnamic ac. RSC Adv 5:71942–71954. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA14001C

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rezaei F, Amrollahi MA, Khalifeh R (2020) Brønsted acidic dicationic ionic liquid immobilized on Fe3O4@SiO2 nanoparticles as an efficient and magnetically separable catalyst for the synthesis of bispyrazoles. ChemistrySelect 5:1760–1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201904831

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Khan KM, Muhammad MT, Khan I et al (2015) Rapid cesium fluoride-catalyzed Knoevenagel condensation for the synthesis of highly functionalized 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ol) derivatives. Monatshefte für Chemie - Chem Mon 146:1587–1590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-015-1424-9

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kuarm BS, Rajitha B (2012) Xanthan sulfuric acid: an efficient, biosupported, and recyclable solid acid catalyst for the synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols). Synth Commun 42:2382–2387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2011.557516

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Das Gupta A, Pal R, Mallik AK (2014) Two efficient and green methods for synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols) without use of any catalyst or solvent. Green Chem Lett Rev 7:404–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518253.2014.970236

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Niknam K, Habibabad MS, Deris A, Aeinjamshid N (2013) Preparation of silica-bonded N-propyltriethylenetetramine as a recyclable solid base catalyst for the synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(1H- pyrazol-5-ols). Monatsh Chem 144:987–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-012-0910-6

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sobhani S, Hasaninejad A-R, Maleki MF, Parizi ZP (2012) Tandem Knoevenagel-Michael reaction of 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone with aldehydes using 3-aminopropylated silica gel as an efficient and reusable heterogeneous catalyst. Synth Commun 42:2245–2255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2011.555589

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sobhani S, Safaei E, Hasaninejad A-R, Rezazadeh S (2009) An eco-friendly procedure for the efficient synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes in aqueous media. J Organomet Chem 694:3027–3031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2009.05.004

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bakherad M, Keivanloo A, Amin AH et al (2017) A rapid, easy, and efficient method for synthesis of 4,4’-(arylmethylene)-bis-(1H-pyrazol-5-ols), catalyzed by boehmite nanoparticles. J Appl Chem 11:31–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40092-014-0072-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Masoumeh K, Vafaei-nezhad M (2016) Design and characterization of L-prolinate-amberlite as a novel heterogeneous organocatalyst and its catalytic application in the synthesis of pyrazol-derivates. Catal Letters 146:353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-015-1668-3

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Les F, Prieto JM, Arbonés-Mainar J et al (2015) Bioactive properties of commercialised pomegranate (Punica granatum) juice: antioxidant, antiproliferative and enzyme inhibiting activities. Food Funct. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FO00426H

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Guamán-Ortiz LM, Romero-Benavides JC, Suarez AI et al (2020) Cytotoxic property of grias neuberthii extract on human colon cancer cells: a crucial role of autophagy. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2020:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1565306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to Dr. John R. Lloyd and Dr. Robert O’Connor at NIDDK-NIH and Joshua J. Kellogg at Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of North Carolina Greensboro, for providing HRMS and NMR spectra. Dr. Kenneth L. Kirk (NIDDK-NIH) provided helpful comments.

Funding

This work was supported by Corporación Ecuatoriana para el Desarrollo de la Investigación y la Academia (CEDIA), (CEPRA XI-2017-10), Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja (UTPL), (PROY_INV_QUI_2017_2222), Universidad UTE, and Universidad Central del Ecuador.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador

    José Eduardo Cadena-Cruz

  2. Departamento de Ciencias de La Salud, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto s/n, C.P. 11 01 608, Loja, Ecuador

    Luis M. Guamán-Ortiz, Natalia Bailon-Moscoso, Kevin E. Murillo-Sotomayor & Nadia V. Ortiz-Guamán

  3. Departamento de Química y Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto s/n, C.P. 11 01 608, Loja, Ecuador

    Juan Carlos Romero-Benavides

  4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica (CENBIO), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud Eugenio Espejo, Universidad UTE, 170527, Quito, Ecuador

    Jorge Heredia-Moya

Authors
  1. José Eduardo Cadena-Cruz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luis M. Guamán-Ortiz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juan Carlos Romero-Benavides
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natalia Bailon-Moscoso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kevin E. Murillo-Sotomayor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nadia V. Ortiz-Guamán
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jorge Heredia-Moya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JECC, JCRB and JHM carried out the synthesis and characterization experiments. JHM performed the DPPH assay. KEMS, NVOG, LMGO, NBM and JCRB performed the biological activities. JCRB and JHM designed and performed the research, analyzed the data, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Heredia-Moya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1

. Original western blots CL-X Posure™ films for Western blots. Each protein was detected in independent films at different times of exposure to the membrane. A) p53; B) p21; C) LC3-I and -II; D) p62; E) BAX; F) Bcl-2; G) Cleaved caspase-3; H) Active and cleaved PARP-1; I) Actin. Notice, for autophagy detection starvation control was first, in contrast to apoptosis control, which UV control was first. Fig. S2. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3a. Fig. S3. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3b. Fig. S4. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3c. Fig. S5. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3d. Fig. S6. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3e. Fig. S7. 19F NMR spectrum of compound 2e. Fig. S8. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3f. Fig. S9. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3 g. Fig. S10. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3 g. Fig. S11. FTIR spectrum of compound 3 g. Fig. S12. ESI–MS spectrum of compound 3 g. Fig. S13. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3 h. Fig. S14. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3i. Fig. S15. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3i. Fig. S16. FTIR spectrum of compound 3i. Fig. S17. HRMS spectrum of compound 3i. Fig. S18. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3j. Fig. S19. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3 k. Fig. S20. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3 l. Fig. S21. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3 m. Fig. S22. 19F NMR spectrum of compound 3 m. Fig. S23. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3n. Fig. S24. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3n. Fig. S25. FTIR spectrum of compound 3n. Fig. S26. ESI–MS spectrum of compound 3n. Fig. S27. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3o. Fig. S28. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3o. Fig. S29. 19F NMR spectrum of compound 3o. Fig. S30. FTIR spectrum of compound 3o. Fig. S31. ESI–MS spectrum of compound 3o. Fig. S32. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3p. Fig. S33. 13C NMR spectrum of compound 3p. Fig. S34. 19F NMR spectrum of compound 3p. Fig. S35. FTIR spectrum of compound 3p. Fig. S36. ESI–MS spectrum of compound 3p. Fig. S37. 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3q.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cadena-Cruz, J.E., Guamán-Ortiz, L.M., Romero-Benavides, J.C. et al. Synthesis of 4,4′-(arylmethylene)bis(3-methyl-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-ols) and evaluation of their antioxidant and anticancer activities. BMC Chemistry 15, 38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-021-00765-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-021-00765-y

Keywords

  • 4,4ʹ-(arylmethylene)bis(1H-pyrazol-5-ols)
  • Antioxidant
  • Apoptosis
  • Autophagy

BMC Chemistry

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us