Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Attractive study of the antimicrobial, antiviral, and cytotoxic activity of novel synthesized silver chromite nanocomposites

BMC Chemistry volume 16, Article number: 39 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a global problem. This is the reason why scientists search for alternative treatments. In this regard, seven novel silver chromite nanocomposites were synthesized and assayed to evaluate their antimicrobial, antiviral, and cytotoxic activity. Five bacterial species were used in this study: three Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus aureus) and two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica). Three fungal species were also tested: Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, and A. flavus. The MIC of the tested compounds was determined using the bifold serial dilution method. The tested compounds showed good antibacterial activity. Maximum antibacterial activity was attained in the case of 15 N [Cobalt Ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)] against M. luteus. Concerning antifungal activity, C. albicans was the most susceptible fungal species. The maximum inhibition was recorded also in case of 15 N [Cobalt Ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)]. The most promising antimicrobial compound 15 N [Cobalt Ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)] was assayed for its antiviral and cytotoxic activity. The tested compound showed weak antiviral activity. The cytotoxic activity against Mammalian cells from African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cells was detected. The inhibitory effect against Hepatocellular carcinoma cells was detected using a MTT assay. The antimicrobial effect of the tested compounds depends on the tested microbial species. The tested compounds could be attractive and alternative antibacterial compounds that open a new path in chemotherapy.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Antibiotics and antimicrobial compounds which can inhibit the growth of microbes or kill them are commonly applied in microbial diseases treatment in humans. The world production of different antimicrobial compounds is 100 –200 thousand tons [1, 2]. The development of antimicrobial resistance to antibiotics led to a huge social and economic impact that causes a significant threat to our future [3]. Current treatments either are less effective or result in further acquired resistance [4]. Dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial frequency increased over the past decades [5]. The emergence of bacterial resistance worldwide affects antibiotic efficacy [6]. Excessive uptake of antimicrobial compounds leads to the development of resistance to antibiotics which leads to the post-antibiotics era, where microorganisms developed multi-drug resistance [7].

Nanoparticle synthesis is a revolution that happened in all fields that attracted researchers from all branches of science [8,9,10,11]. Nanoparticles existed on Earth and man life. It can be manufactured biologically, anthropogenically, and geologically in erosion, volcanoes, fires of forests, burning of charcoal, and industry [12]. Moreover, nanoparticles can be prepared by different methods such as the solid-state method and wet methods [13,14,15,16,17]. The easy, low cost, rapid, save time and give high yield method is the Flash auto-combustion technique in which all the investigated samples have been prepared with it [18,19,20,21,22]. Magnetic nanomaterials are important in many technological applications especially biomedical applications [23,24,25]. As reported, there is a relation between the saturation magnetization and the antimicrobial properties in which high saturation magnetization gives strong antibacterial activity [26]. The physical and magnetic properties of silver chromites nanoparticles were studied in detail in previous work [27]. Considering the mechanism of nanoparticles, nanoparticles of silver are strong candidates as antiviral compounds. Nanoparticles attack a wide range of microbes which is futile [28]. Developments in Nanomedicine lead to evaluation and understanding of the ability of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) to be good antibiotic alternatives [29]. Nanoparticles are used to target bacteria as an alternative to antibiotics [30]. Different types of interactions of nanoparticles with bacterial cells include reactive oxygen production, the release of cation, damage of biomolecules, depletion of ATP, and interaction with membrane [31].

Many methods are used to screen the in vitro antimicrobial activity, like disk-diffusion and broth methods [32].

Generally, the cytotoxicity of the nanoparticles increased with an increase in concentration [33]. Nanoparticles can cross biological barriers and access a wide range of tissues in the body, such as the brain [34]. The risk and hazard of nanoparticles are key to be used by humans. In vivo studies is the source of information regarding its effects on the physiology of organisms [35, 36].

Silver chromite is applied in the preparation of important compounds that can be applied in many fields such as cancer diagnosis, biomedical applications, and antimicrobial activities [29, 37]. The use of nanomaterials is a suitable way to overcome microbial resistance [3].

In this work novel synthesized silver chromite nanocomposites were evaluated for their antimicrobial, antiviral, and cytotoxic activity.

Experimental techniques

Synthesis of nanoparticles

Seven nanocomposites were prepared by flash method with initial ingredients metal nitrates such as silver nitrate, chromium nitrate, copper nitrate, lanthanum nitrate, cobalt nitrate, iron III nitrate, and urea mixed with a small amount of distilled water with a stoichiometric ratio. Then the mixture was heated at 250 °C. The ashes were produced then the powders were ground. Samples 1 N and 2 N were a Nanocomposite of two different concentrations of lanthanum perovskite and silver chromite, where 1 N [Lanthanum perovskite (0.3LaFeO3) + Silver chromite (0.7Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)] and 2 N [Lanthanum perovskite (0.5 LaFeO3) + Silver chromite (0.5Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)]. Samples 8 N and 10 N were a Nanocomposite of two different concentrations of copper ferrite and silver chromite, where 8 N [Copper Ferrite (0.3 CuFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.7Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)], and 10 N [Copper Ferrite (0.5 CuFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.5 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)]. Sample 15 N was a nanocomposite nanoparticle of the mixture of concentration 0.3 cobalt ferrite and 0.7 silver chromite, and 17 N was a Nanocomposite of two different concentrations of cobalt ferrite and silver chromite, where 15 N [Cobalt Ferrite (0.3CoFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)], and 17 N [Cobalt Ferrite (0.5CoFe2O4) + Silver chromite (0.5Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)]. Finally, Sample 15 was pure silver chromite (Ag0.5Cr2.5O4). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy was studied for the pure sample using the HRTEM model Tecnai G20, Netherlands. Moreover, the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) was studied for pure sample using SEM model quanta 250 FEG apparatus. Also, Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was studied for 8 N nanoparticles (0.3 CuFe2O4 + 0.7Ag0.5Cr2.5O4) using non-contact wet SPM 9600 Shimadzu.

Biological activity

Materials

Fungi and bacteria were supplied by the Faculty of Science, Cairo University.

Isolation and identification of microorganisms

Fungal species were cultivated on a PDA medium; plates were incubated at 25 °C for 7 days. The identification was assured, according to Moubasher [38]. Bacteria were grown on nutrient agar plates. The identification was assured according to growing Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology [39].

Assay of antimicrobial activity

Sabouraud medium was inoculated with 106 colony forming units/ml (CFU/ ml) of microorganisms. Then, discs (6 mm in diameter) containing 100 µg/ml of the test compound were added to the agar surface. The Petri plates were incubated at 27 °C for 5 days. The diameters of inhibition growth zones were measured. Three fungal species: Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, and Candia albicans, were used in this study. Tioconazole (100 µg/ml) was used as a control [40]. Five bacterial species were assayed; three Gram-positive species (Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Bacillus subtilis) and two Gram-negative species (Salmonella enterica and Escherichia coli) were added at concentration 106 (CFU/ml) to Mueller–Hinton Agar before solidification. Plates were incubated at 35 °C for 2 days. Ampicillin (100 µg/ml) was used as a control [41].

Relative activity

The ratio between the activity of a sample of interest and the activity of the control sample.

Minimum Inhibitory Concentration

The MIC of the assayed compounds was determined [42]. The serial dilution method evaluated the inhibitory effect of the different compounds on bacterial growth. The studied concentrations were 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.62, 7.8, 3.9, 1.9, and 0.9 µg/ml. The compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide. Mueller–Hinton broth and Sabouraud liquid medium were used as culture media for bacteria and fungi, respectively. Test inoculums of 104 /CFU were applied.

Antiviral assay

Viral propagation

The cytopathogenic HAV (HM175 strain) (ATCC VR-1402) of Hepatitis A Virus was assayed in confluent Vero cells [43], and it was counted by determination of the 50% infectious dose (TCID50) using the Spearman-Karber method [44].

Antiviral activity

It was done using the Regional Center for Mycology and Biotechnology (RCMB, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt). This assay was done by the MTT method [45]. Amantadine was used as a control. The viability of cells was determined [46]. The viral inhibition rate was: ([(A − B)/(C − B)] × 100%) where A, B, and C are the absorbance of the tested compounds, the absorbance of the virus control, and the absorbance of the cell control, respectively.

Cytotoxicity

Mammalian cell line

Vero cells (derived from the kidney of African green monkey) (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). Vero cells were propagated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium [47]. Viable cell yield was determined by a MTT [46]. The optical density was measured at 590 nm with the microplate reader (Sunrise, TECAN, Inc, USA). The viability percentage was calculated as [(ODt/ODc)] × 100%, where ODt is the optical density of the tested sample and ODc is the optical density of untreated cells.

Hepatocarcinoma cells

HepG-2cells (ATCC, Rockville, MD), and the chemicals Used: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), MTT, and trypan blue dye (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo., USA). Fetal Bovine serum, DMEM, RPMI-1640, HEPES buffer solution, L-glutamine, gentamycin, and 0.25% Trypsin–EDTA (Lonza, Belgium).

Cell line propagation

The cells were grown on RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% inactivated fetal calf serum and 50 µg/ml gentamycin. The cells were maintained at 37 ºC. The optical density was measured at 590 nm with the microplate reader (Sunrise, TECAN, Inc, USA). The viability percentage was calculated as [(ODt/ODc)] × 100%. IC50 is the concentration needed to cause toxic effects in 50% of intact cells (San Diego, CA. USA) [48].

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 22. According to Kolmogorov-Smirnova and Shapiro–Wilk tests, data was normally distributed within groups. Accordingly, parametric analysis was applied for the statistical analysis of data. ANOVA was utilized to study the effect of treatment on the studied parameters. Duncan’s test was utilized to study the similarity among the studied groups. An Independent t-test was applied to estimate the statistical difference between the control and 15 N groups. Data were presented as mean (n = 3) ± standard deviation.

Results

HRTEM analysis

Figure 1a shows the morphology of the pure sample (Ag0.5Cr2.5O4) using High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy to assure that the sample was in the nanoscale range. The nanoparticles showed an agglomeration due to no surfactant being added during the preparation method. Moreover, the smaller the particles, the easily agglomerated to each other. Figure 1b shows the histogram of the average particle size estimated from the HRTEM micrograph and shows that the nanosized of the histogram was 93.14 nm.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a HRTEM micrograph. b Histogram of average particle size of Ag0.5Cr2.5O4 nanoparticle

Full size image

The polydispersity index (P) was calculated using the following formula:

$$P= \frac{standard\;deviation (\sigma )}{averave\;radius\;of\;the\;nanoparticles ({R}_{av})}$$
(1)

The polydispersity index showed that the pure sample gave a 0.35 value.

FESEM analysis

Figure 2 shows the field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) of Ag0.5Cr2.5O4 nanoparticles. The figure showed that the sample in the nanosized with spherical shape and agglomeration due to the absence of surfactant during the preparation method.

Fig. 2
figure 2

FESEM image of Ag0.5Cr2.5O4 nanoparticle

Full size image

AFM analysis

Figure 3 shows the atomic force microscopy (AFM) of 8 N nanoparticles (0.3 CuFe2O4 + 0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4). The micrograph showed the size of the nanoparticles in the nano shape with agglomeration.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Two dimensional AFM image of 8 N nanoparticles (0.3 CuFe2O4 + 0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)

Full size image

Antibacterial activity

Seven nanoparticle compounds were assayed against five bacterial species: three Gram-positive (Bacillus subtilis, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus aureus) and two Gram-negative (Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica).

Maximum inhibition zone diameter (29 mm) was attained in the case of compound 15 N against M. luteus. Other tested species recorded lower inhibition zone diameter. The minimum inhibition zone (11 mm) was shown in the case of compound 8 N against S. enterica (Table 1; Fig. 4).

Table 1 Antibacterial activity of the synthesized nanoparticle compounds against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus Leteus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella entreica
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

Antibacterial activity of some synthesized nanoparticle compounds against Micrococcus Leteus, Salmonella entreica, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus

Full size image

The highest relative activity (53.57%) was achieved in the case of 17 N against S. enterica, followed by 10 N against E. coli (52.38%) and (50%) in the case of 15 N against S. enterica. Salmonella enterica was significantly inhibited by all tested nanoparticle compounds, while Bacillus subtilis was the most resistant bacterial species to the assayed compounds (Table 2).

Table 2 Relative activity (%) of the synthesized Nanoparticle compounds against Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, Micrococcus Leteus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella entreica
Full size table

Antifungal activity

The seven nanoparticle compounds were assayed for their antifungal activity against three fungal species: Candida albicans, Aspergillus flavus, and A. niger. Compounds showed significant antifungal activity against C. albicans, where 7–14 mm inhibition zone diameters were recorded. The maximum inhibition zone was attained by compound 2 N, while the minimum inhibition zone (7 mm) was recorded in the case of compound 10 N. Weak antifungal activity was recorded in the case of Aspergillus flavus and A. niger (Table 3; Fig. 5).

Table 3 Antifungal activity of the synthesized nanoparticle compounds against Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, and Candida albicans
Full size table
Fig. 5
figure 5

Antifungal activity of the synthesized nanoparticle compounds against Aspergillus niger, Candida albicans, and Aspergillus flavus

Full size image

Concerning the relative activity, it was found that the highest relative activity (52%, 58%, and 44%) was achieved against C. albicans in the case of 1 N, 2 N., and 15 N, respectively (Table 4).

Table 4 Relative activity (%) of the synthesized Nanoparticle compounds against Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus niger, and Candida albicans
Full size table

Minimum inhibitory concentration

The data shows that the least MIC (31.25 µg/ml) was obtained in the case of 10 N and 2 N against M. luteus; and compound 15 N against S. enterica and B. subtilis (Table 5; Fig. 6).

Table 5 Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the nanoparticle compounds against Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus Leteus, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Bacillus subtilis
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Minimum inhibitory concentrations of the nanoparticle compounds against bacterial species (Micrococcus Leteus, Salmonella entreica, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Staphylococcus aureus)

Full size image

Antiviral assay

Based on the results of antimicrobial activity of the tested compounds, compound 15 N was chosen to evaluate its antiviral activity against the Hepatitis A virus. The tested compound showed weak antiviral activity compared to Amantadine (control). The inhibitory activity of the tested sample against the hepatitis A virus was detected under these experimental conditions with a 50% effective concentration (EC50) = 408.14 ± 21.62 µg/ml. The dose inhibited 50% (EC50) was estimated (Table 6; Fig. 7).

Table 6 Antiviral activity of compound 15 N against Hepatitis A virus
Full size table
Fig. 7
figure 7

The inhibitory activity of the tested sample against Hepatitis A Virus

Full size image

Cytotoxicity test

Against VERO cell line

The Cytotoxic activity of the synthesized nanoparticles was assayed against Mammalian cells from African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cells was detected under these experimental conditions with 50% cell cytotoxic concentration (CC50) = 280.4 ± 19.3 µg/ml. The results showed that the higher the sample concentration the greater the cytotoxicity. Concentrations less than 31.25 µg/ml of the test compound showed no cytotoxicity (Table 7; Fig. 8).

Table 7 The cytotoxic activity against Mammalian cells from African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cells
Full size table
Fig. 8
figure 8

Evaluation of cytotoxicity against Mammalian cells from African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cell line

Full size image

Cytotoxicity against hepatocellular carcinoma

Inhibitory activity against Hepatocellular carcinoma cells was detected using MTT assay under these experimental conditions with (IC50 = 26.7 ± 2.31 µg/ml) and this was for the compound (15 N). The results indicated that low concentrations of the tested compound (greater than 15.6 µg/ml) showed promising anticancer activity against the tested hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Table 8; Fig. 9).

Table 8 Inhibitory activity against Hepatocellular carcinoma cells was detected using MTT assay
Full size table
Fig. 9
figure 9

Evaluation of cytotoxicity against Hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG-2) cell line

Full size image

Discussion

Antimicrobial resistance is one of the public health problems; it has a significant effect on the world. Therapeutic options to treat infectious diseases are limited due to antimicrobial resistance [49]. The misuse and overuse of antimicrobial compounds is a global phenomenon that increases the levels of antimicrobial compounds in the ecosystem and the rates of their spread [50]. The abuse of antimicrobial compounds and improper control of diseases led to the emergence of resistant microbes that are a major threat to the world's health. Therefore, research and development of new antimicrobial compounds to mitigate antibiotic resistance are imperative [51].

Nanoparticles have numerous properties, including antimicrobial activity against many microbes. The antimicrobial nanoparticle compounds can be used to overcome antibiotic resistance [52]. Antimicrobial nanoparticles such as silver nanoparticles have been utilized in biocides for over 120 years [53]. The technique used to prepare nanoparticles should be efficient, low cost, high yield, and produce very fine nanoparticles [54]. The XRD technique initially characterized the synthesized nanoparticles, which confirmed their crystalline nature. Moreover, the XRD analysis of Ag0.5Cr2.5O4 was discussed in detail in our previous study [27] and showed the formation of a single-phase spinel structure of the nano sample with a crystallite size of 72.6 nm. The morphology was studied using HRTEM, FESEM, and AFM to confirm that the nanoparticles of the samples were in the nanoscale range. Also, the micrograph and the histogram in Fig. 1 assured that the pure sample (Ag0.5Cr2.5O4) in the nanoscale range (93.14 nm) with a polydispersity index of 0.35 due to the aggregation of the nanoparticles. Moreover, the physical and magnetic properties are detailed in previous work [27].

Nanoparticles synthesized at low temperature have a small size which enables them to penetrate the cell wall and the cell membrane of the microbial cell to damage the internal organelles and molecules, causing inhibition of growth and even death [55]. The tested compounds showed significant antibacterial activity. As the concentration of nanoparticle compounds increased, the diameter of the inhibition zone increased. Gram-positive bacteria were more susceptible to the tested compounds than Gram-negative bacteria due to the absence of an outer membrane. Maximum antibacterial activity was attained in the case of 15 N [cobalt ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)] against M. luteus. The synthesized material exhibits strong bacteriostatic properties against E. coli at a concentration of nanoparticles of silver oxide of more than 0.01% [56]. The mode of antibacterial activity of metals includes disruption of enzyme function [57], reactive oxygen production [58], disruption of the membrane, prevention of absorption of essential elements [59], and genotoxic activity [60, 61].

The tested compounds showed significant antifungal activity. C. albicans was the most susceptible fungal species. The maximum inhibition was recorded also in case of 15 N [cobalt ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)]. The dispersion of silver nanoparticles in a polymer matrix enhances antibacterial efficacy by the regulated release of Ag+ cations, which may considerably limit infectious agent transmission [62,63,64,65].

The antiviral activity of the tested compound showed weak antiviral activity. This contrasted with Ting et al.'s conclusion that the antiviral impact of the as-prepared GO-AgNPs nanocomposites on virus replication was studied [66]. The findings suggested that exposure to GO-AgNPs nanocomposites was capable of suppressing PRRSV infection. Concerning the cytotoxicity test; it was found that the tested compounds showed low cytotoxicity against normal cells. When the concentration of silver oxide nanoparticles is less than 0.1 percent, the BS/silver oxide NPs show no harmful impact on eukaryotic cell cultures. The use of the resultant silver oxide nanoparticle composite as a reusable dry disinfectant is justified by its low toxicity and bacteriostatic activity, which are comparable to those of the medicinal alloy nitinol [55]. However, the antitumor efficacy of the silver chromite nanoparticles studied was encouraging. The biological activity of the produced Ni-Zn chromites was evaluated using Hela cell lines [67] and gave promising results. The cytotoxic activity against Mammalian cells from African Green Monkey Kidney (Vero) cells was detected. The inhibitory activity against Hepatocellular carcinoma cells was detected using a MTT assay. The most promising antimicrobial compound 15 N [cobalt ferrite (0.3 CoFe2O4) + silver chromite (0.7 Ag0.5Cr2.5O4)] was assayed for its antiviral and cytotoxic activity. Finally, the tested compounds could be attractive and alternative antibacterial compounds that open a new path in chemotherapy.

Conclusion

The preparation of seven silver nanocomposites using flash auto combustion techniques was synthesized successfully. The morphology of the nanoparticles was investigated using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy to ensure that they were formed in nanosized. The tested compounds (especially 15 N due to the presence of cobalt ferrite and silver chromite) showed promising antibacterial and antifungal activity; at the same time the cytotoxicity was low, and they could be used as efficient therapeutic agents against multidrug-resistant microbes that cause human diseases.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Wang M, Tang JC. Research of antibiotics pollution in soil environments and its ecological toxicity. J Agro-Environ Sci. 2010;29:261–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Czekalski N, Gascon Díez E, Bürgmann H. Wastewater as a point source of antibiotic-resistance genes in the sediment of a freshwater lake. ISME J. 2014;8:1381–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Truong LB, Medina-Cruz D, Mostafavi E, Rabiee N. Selenium nanomaterials to combat antimicrobial resistance. Molecules. 2021;26:3611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tziros GT, Samaras A, Karaoglanidis GS. Laminarin induces defense responses and efficiently controls olive leaf spot disease in olive. Molecules. 2021;26:1043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Fair RJ, Tor Y. Antibiotics and bacterial resistance in the 21st century. Perspect Med Chem. 2014;6:25–64.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baloch Z, Aslam B, Wang W, Arshad MI, Khurshid M, et al. Antibiotic resistance; a rundown on global crisis. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reardon S. WHO warns against “post-antibiotic” era. Nature. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2014.15135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohsen AS, Abdelsalam HK, El-Bassuony AAH. Antimicrobial activity of Novel spinel nanoferrites against pathogenic fungi and bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;36:25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Synthesis, characterization and antimicrobial activity of AgFeO2 delafossite. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2018;29:11699–711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Bassuony AAH. Influence of high annealing temperature on structural, magnetic and antimicrobial activity of silver chromite nanoparticles for biomedical applications. J Inorg Organomet Polym Mater. 2020;30:1821–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohsen AS, El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Evaluation of antimicrobial properties of a Novel synthesized nanometric Delafossite. Braz J Microbiol. 2020;51(4):1475–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK, Gamal WM. Influence of elastic and optical properties on AgFeO2 and AgCrO2 delafossite to be applied in high frequency applications. JOM. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05170-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. El-Bassuony, AAH, Gamal WM, Abdelsalam HK. Influence of silver nanoferrite and nanochromite on physical properties for high-frequency and biomedical applications. JOM. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05315-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Attractive improvement in structural, magnetic, optical, and antimicrobial activity of silver delafossite by Fe/Cr doping. J Supercond Novel Magn. 2018;3:3691–703.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdelsalam HK. Enhancing the structural and spectroscopic properties of Cr3+ ion-doped Ni/Cd/Zn nanoferrite to be applied to industrial applications. J Supercond Novel Magn. 2018;31:4063–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Bassuony AAH. A comparative study of physical properties of Er and Yb nanophase ferrite for industrial application. J Supercond Novel Magn. 2018;31:2829–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Bassuony AAH. Tuning the structural and magnetic properties on Cu/Cr nanoferrite using different rare-earth ions. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2017;29:3259–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Bassuony AAH. Effect of Al addition on structural, magnetic, and antimicrobial properties of Ag nanoparticles for biomedical applications. JOM. 2020;72:1154–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gamal WM, El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK, Abd EI Wahab SM. Role of elastic and optical properties on silver nanoferrite and nanochromite for optical switch device applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2021;32:21590–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Modification of AgFeO2 by double nanometric delafossite to be suitable as energy storage in solar cell. J Alloy Compd. 2017;726:1106–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Enhancement of AgCrO2 by double nanometric delafossite to be applied in many technological applications. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2018;29:5401–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Tailoring the structural, magnetic and antimicrobial activity of AgCrO2 delafossite at high annealing temperature. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2019;138:81–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Correlation of heat treatment and the impurities accompanying Ag nanoparticles. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020;135:66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Fascinating study of the physical properties of a novel nanometric delafossite for biomedical applications. JOM. 2019;71:1866–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Synthesis, characterization, magnetic and antimicrobial properties of silver chromite nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Electron. 2020;31:3662–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Impacts of hematite, bunsenite and maghemite impurities on the physical and antimicrobial properties of silver nanoparticles. Eur Phys J Plus. 2020;135:64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Bassuony AAH, Abdelsalam HK. Giant exchange bias of hysteresis loops on Cr3+-doped Ag nanoparticles. J Supercond Novel Magn. 2018;31:1539–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Salleh A, Naomi R, Utami ND, Mohammad WA, Mahmoudi E, Mustafa N, Fauzi MB. The potential of silver nanoparticles for antiviral and antibacterial applications: a mechanism of action. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1566.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Paper C. Preparation of silver nanoparticles and their application in wastewater preparation of silver nanoparticles and their application in wastewater treatment, 4 (May). 2017.

  30. Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:1227–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Slavin YN, Asnis J, Hafeli UO, Bach H. Metal nanoparticles: understanding the mechanisms behind antibacterial activity. J Nanobiotechnol. 2017;15:65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohapatra S, Leelavathi L, Rajeshkumar S, Sri Sakthi D, Jayashri P. Assessment of cytotoxicity, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of zinc oxide nanoparticles synthesized using clove and cinnamon formulation—an in-vitro study. J Evol Med Dental Sci. 2020;9:1859–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Nel A, Xia T, Mädler L, Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science. 2006;311:622–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chupani L, Niksirat H, Velíšek J, Stará A, Hradilová Š, Kolaˇrík J, Panáˇcek A, Zusková E. Chronic dietary toxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): tissue accumulation and physiological responses. Ecotoxicol Environ Safet. 2018;147:110–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Qian H, Zhu K, Lu H, Lavoie M, Chen S, Zhou Z, Deng Z, Chen J, Fu Z. Contrasting silver nanoparticle toxicity and detoxification strategies in Microcystis aeruginosa and Chlorella vulgaris: new insights from proteomic and physiological analyses. Sci Total Environ. 2016;572:1213–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mytych J, Zebrowski J, Lewinska A, Wnuk M. Prolonged effects of silver nanoparticles on p53/p21 pathway-mediated proliferation, DNA damage response, and methylation parameters in HT22 hippocampal neuronal cells. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54(2):1285–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moubasher AH. Soil fungi in Qatar and other Arab countries. Doha : Center for Scientific and Applied Research; 1993:University of Qatar.

  38. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST. Genus Acetobacter and Gluconobacter. Bergey’s manual of determinative bacteriology. 9th edn., vol 14. Williams and Wilkens, MD USA; 1994. p. 668–75.

  39. CLSI, Method for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts, approved guideline. CLSI document M44-A. CLSI, 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA; 2004. p. 19087-1898.

  40. CLSI, Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, approved standard, 7th ed., CLSI document M02-A11. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 950 West Valley Road, Suite 2500, Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA; 2012. p. 19087.

  41. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 28th ed.; CLSI Supplement M100; Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2018. ISBN1 978-1-68440-066-9.

  42. Vijayan P, Raghu C, Ashok G, Dhanaraj SA, Suresh B. Antiviral activity of medicinal plants of Nilgiris. Indian J Med Res. 2014;120:24–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Randazzo W, Piqueras J, Rodrıguez-Diaz J, Aznar R, Sanchez G. Improving efficiency of viability-qPCR for selective detection of infectious HAV in food and water samples. J Appl Microbiol. 2017;124(4):958–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Pinto RM, Diez JM, Bosch A. Use of the colonic carcinoma cell line CaCo-2 for in vivo amplification and detection of enteric viruses. J Med Virol. 1994;44:310–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu JM, Hsiung GD. Evaluation of new antiviral agents I: In vitro prospective. Antiviral Res. 1989;11:217–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Rani R, Sharma D, Chaturvedi M, Parkash YJ. Antibacterial activity of twenty different endophytic fungi isolated from Calotropis procera and time kill assay. Clin Microbiol Open Access. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-5073.1000280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Al-Salahi R, Alswaidan I, Ghabbour HA, Ezzeldin E, Elaasser MM, Marzouk M. Docking and antiherpetic activity of 2-aminobenzo[de]-isoquinoline-1,3-diones. Molecules. 2015;20:5099–111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. World Health Organization (WHO). Antibiotic resistance. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance. 2020.

  49. Serwecińska L. Antimicrobials and antibiotic-resistant bacteria: a risk to the environment and to public health. Water. 2020;12:3313.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Leon-Buitimea A, Garza-Cardenas CR, Garza-Cervantes JA, Lerma-Escalera JA, Morones-Ramirez JR. The demand for new antibiotics: antimicrobial peptides, nanoparticles, and combinatorial therapies as future strategies in antibacterial agent design. Front Microbiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01669.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Yang X, Chung E, Johnston I, Ren G, Cheong YK. Exploitation of antimicrobial nanoparticles and their applications in biomedical engineering. Appl Sci. 2021;11:4520.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nowack B, Krug HF, Height M. 120 years of nanosilver history: implications for policy makers. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:1177–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Jaldurgam FF, Ahmad Z, Touati F. Synthesis and performance of large-scale cost-effective environment-friendly nanostructured thermoelectric materials. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:1091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang L, Hu C, Shao L. The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1227–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Chausov DN, Smirnova VV, Burmistrov DE, Sarimov RM, Kurilov AD, Astashev ME, Uvarov OV, Dubinin MV, Kozlov VA, Vedunova MV, et al. Synthesis of a novel, biocompatible and bacteriostatic borosiloxane composition with silver oxide nanoparticles. Materials. 2022;15:527. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15020527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Stadtman E. Oxidation of free amino acids and amino acid residues in proteins by radiolysis and by metal-catalyzed reactions. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:797–821.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Valko M, Morris H, Cronin M. Metals, toxicity and oxidative stress. Curr Med Chem. 2005;12:1161–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Pereira Y, Lagniel G, Godat E, Baudouin-Cornu P, Junot C, Labarre J. Chromate causes sulfur starvation in yeast. Toxicol Sci. 2008;106:400–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Nishioka H. Mutagenic activities of metal compounds in bacteria. Mutat Res. 1975;31:185–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wong P. Mutagenicity of heavy metals. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1988;40:597–603.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Armentano I, Arciola CR, Fortunati E, Ferrari D, Mattioli S, Amoroso CF, Rizzo J, Kenny JM, Imbriani M, Visai L. The interaction of bacteria with engineered nanostructured polymeric materials: a review. Sci World J. 2014;2014: 410423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Tran QH, Le A-T. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, toxicology, applications and perspectives. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2013;4: 033001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Krystosiak P, Tomaszewski W, Megiel E. High-density polystyrene-grafted silver nanoparticles and their use in the preparation of nanocomposites with antibacterial properties. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;498:9–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Cobos M, De-La-Pinta I, Quindós G, Fernández MJ, Fernández MD. Synthesis, physical, mechanical and antibacterial properties of nanocomposites based on poly (vinyl alcohol)/graphene oxide–silver nanoparticles. Polymers. 2020;12:723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Lee W-F, Tsao K-T. Effect of silver nanoparticles content on the various properties of nanocomposite hydrogels by in situ polymerization. J Mater Sci. 2010;45:89–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Du T, Lu J, Liu L, Dong N, Fang L, Xiao S, Han H. Antiviral activity of graphene oxide–silver nanocomposites by preventing viral entry and activation of the antiviral innate immune response. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2018;1(5):1286–93. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kumari PS, Charan GV, Kumar DR. Synthesis, structural, photocatalytic and anti-cancer activity of Zn doped Ni nano chromites by citrate gel auto combustion method. Inorg Chem Commun. 2022;139: 109393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Faculty of Science, Cairo University, for the financial support of this study.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This research is funded by the Faculty of Science, Cairo University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Mohsen A. Sayed, Tahany M. A. Abd El-Rahman & Ahmed M. Ali

  2. Basic Science Department, Higher Institute of Applied Arts 5th Settlement, New Cairo, Egypt

    H. K. Abdelsalam

  3. Biotechnology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Mayar M. Hamdy, Yara A. Badr, Nada H. Abd El- Rahman, Sabah M. Abd El-Latif, Sara H. Mostafa, Sondos S. Mohamed & Ziad M. Ali

  4. Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt

    Asmaa A. H. El-Bassuony

Authors
  1. Mohsen A. Sayed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tahany M. A. Abd El-Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. H. K. Abdelsalam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed M. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mayar M. Hamdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yara A. Badr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nada H. Abd El- Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sabah M. Abd El-Latif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sara H. Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Sondos S. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ziad M. Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Asmaa A. H. El-Bassuony
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting, and revising of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asmaa A. H. El-Bassuony.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sayed, M.A., El-Rahman, T.M.A.A., Abdelsalam, H.K. et al. Attractive study of the antimicrobial, antiviral, and cytotoxic activity of novel synthesized silver chromite nanocomposites. BMC Chemistry 16, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00832-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-022-00832-y

Keywords

BMC Chemistry

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us