Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Optimization of reaction parameters in hydrothermal synthesis: a strategy towards the formation of CuS hexagonal plates



For decades, copper sulphide has been renowned as the superior optical and semiconductor materials. Its potential applications can be ranged from solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, sensors, and catalyst systems. The synthesis methodologies of copper sulphide with different controlled morphology have been widely explored in the literature. Nevertheless, the understanding on the formation chemistry of CuS is still limited. The ultimate approach undertaking in this article is to investigate the formation of CuS hexagonal plates via the optimization of reaction parameters in hydrothermal reaction between copper (II) nitrate and sodium thiosulphate without appending any assistant agent.


Covellite (CuS) hexagonal plates were formed at copper ion: thiosulphate ion ( Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 ) mole ratio of 1:2 under hydrothermal treatment of 155°C for 12 hours. For synthesis conducted at reaction temperature lower than 155°C, copper sulphate (CuSO4), krohnite (NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2] and cyclooctasulphur (S8) were present as main impurities with covellite (CuS). When Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio was varied to 1: 1 and 1: 1.5, phase pure plate-like natrochalcite [NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)] and digenite (Cu9S5) were produced respectively. Meanwhile, mixed phases of covellite (CuS) and cyclooctasulphur (S8) were both identified when Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio was varied to 1: 2.5, 1: 3 and 1: 5 as well as when reaction time was shortened to 1 hour.


CuS hexagonal plates with a mean edge length of 1 μm, thickness of 100 nm and average crystallite size of approximately (45 ± 2) nm (Scherrer estimation) were successfully synthesized via assisting agent- free hydrothermal method. Under a suitable Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio, we evidenced that the formation of covellite (CuS) is feasible regardless of the reaction temperature applied. However, a series of impurities were attested with CuS if reaction temperature was not elevated high enough for the additional crystallite phase decomposition. It was also identified that Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio plays a vital role in controlling the amount of cyclooctasulphur (S8) in the final powder obtained. Finally, reaction time was recognized as an important parameter in impurity decomposition as well as increasing the crystallite size and crystallinity of the CuS hexagonal plates formed.


Copper sulphides have received momentous attention from both chemists and material scientists owing to its unique physical and chemical properties [13] for potential applications in solar cells, lithium-ion batteries, sensors, and catalysts [48]. To date, various copper sulphide of specific morphologies such as flakes-like [9], rod-like [10], needle-like [11], wires-like [12, 13], tubes-like [14], or even spheres-like [15] have been reported. Nonetheless, the significance of plate-like structured materials is remarkably manifested in the literature as promising building blocks for nanodevices with its controlled crystal orientation due to their anisotropic structures [1619]. In fact, a great deal of effort has been dedicated to the synthesis of CuS with plate-like structure, particularly hexagonal plate-shaped. Du et al. have revealed that shape-controlled hexagonal CuS can be prepared by employing copper acetate and carbon disulphide with toluene and hexadecylamine as assisting agents via a solvothermal process [20]. CuS hexagonal plates were fabricated using CTAB and nitric acid as assisting agent on top of copper (II) chloride and sodium thiosulphate as precursors via a hydrothermal method [21]. Y. Liu et al. have synthesized CuS hexagonal plates by applying hexadecylamine, ethanol, potassium ethylxanthate and copper nitrate through a facile solution route [22]. A mixed-mode method of wet chemical and modified hydrothermal techniques which employed copper (II) chloride, acetylacetone, sodium acetate, dichloromethane, ethanol, and sodium hydroxide as precursors was also demonstrated by Basu et al. to achieve the formation of CuS with hexagonal stacked plates morphology [23]. Despite the enormous synthesis methods developed in fabricating hexagonal shaped CuS, it could be seen that the formation of CuS is not fully understood due to the use of multiple solvent phases or additional assisting agent which is present in the reactions. This factor can eventually result in a complicated series of reaction occurring in the synthesis which leads to difficulty in explaining the CuS formation.

Generally, the ultimate challenge in any synthesis approach is to identify the role of each reaction parameter in controlling the morphology and crystal structure of the final products obtained. This understanding is essential in distinguishing and establishing the reaction mechanism for the targeted compound formation. Hence, our approach is focusing on the investigation of CuS hexagonal plates formation via the optimization of reaction parameters in hydrothermal reactions between copper (II) nitrate and sodium thiosulphate without appending any assistant agent. Hydrothermal method is selected in this work because it requires no complex organometallic precursor in the reaction [24, 25]. Furthermore, highly crystalline products with controlled morphology can be easily achieved in hydrothemal treatment by varying the specific source species, reaction temperature, reaction time and etc. [26, 27]. In the entire methodology, we have chosen mild reactants like copper (II) nitrate and sodium thiosulphate as the precursors; unlike the case of hydrogen sulphide [28, 29], ammonium sulphide [30] and sodium sulphide [14, 31, 32] which are highly reactive and nasty in handling during the experiment.

In the present study, covellite (CuS) is identified as a thermodynamically stable compound in which its formation is feasible at appropriate Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio even at room temperature condition. However, a series of impurities were attested with CuS if reaction temperature was not elevated high enough for their decompositions. With the aim to further comprehend CuS hexagonal plates formation, the roles of reaction temperature, Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio and reaction time towards the crystal structures and morphologies of the final products formed were systematically investigated. The possible formation and growth of CuS hexagonal plates during the hydrothermal treatment were also proposed based on the presence of Cu (I) instead of Cu (II) species in the crystal structure of covellite (CuS) [33]. The entire methodology described herein has provided us further insight on the use of facile hydrothermal technique in studying the reactions between aqueous solution phase reactants as well as synthesizing highly crystalline phase pure covellite (CuS) hexagonal plates without any assisting agent.

Results and discussion

Structural and compositional analyses of CuS hexagonal plates

The crystal phase of the product formed in the reaction of copper nitrate and sodium thiosulphate was identified by powder XRD technique. The powder XRD pattern as illustrated in Figure 1 shows the crystal phase of product formed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 under 155°C. All the characteristic peaks in this pattern correspond well to the hexagonal phase covellite in the space group of P63/mmc which can be well indexed to PDF 06–464 with a = 3.792 Å and c = 16.34 Å. The diffractogram of this compound exhibits no XRD peaks arising from impurities of CuO, S, and other CuxS. This denotes high phase purity of the CuS obtained in the facile hydrothermal batch route developed.

Figure 1
figure 1

Powder XRD pattern of CuS. Synthesis was conducted at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 at 155°C for 12 hours.

The morphology of the fabricated sample was characterized by FESEM technique (Figure 2a). It is clearly shown that the powder obtained exhibits particles with hexagonal plate structure. The hexagonal shape plates assembled, interlaced and perpendicular to one another. It could be observed that the hexagonal plates have a mean edge length of 1 μm and an average thickness of ca. 100 nm. The hexagonal plate architecture found can be significantly related to the formation of the hexagonal phase of covellite in which it correlates well with the single phase of covellite determined by powder XRD analysis. The insight of the hexagonal plate microstructure was also examined by employing TEM and HRTEM analyses. The TEM image as depicted in Figure 2b vividly shows the stack layers orientation of many CuS plates with hexagonal structure. The observation of hexagonal shaped particle from TEM analysis agrees well with the morphology determined from FESEM images. Figure 2c depicts the HRTEM image of the hexagonal shaped particle. From the well resolved 2D lattice fringes of the CuS hexagonal plate measured, two adjacent lattice spacings of 0.19 nm and 0.33 nm have been identified from the image. It is important to note that both of the lattice spacings of 0.19 nm and 0.33 nm relate well to the {110} and {100} plane spacings of hexagonal CuS respectively. A Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) pattern of the as-synthesized CuS hexagonal plate is also captured in Figure 2d. The ordered hexagonal-like spot arrays visibly illustrated in the FFT pattern again confirmed the formation of CuS with hexagonal shape. All these results strongly signify the single crystallinity of the CuS hexagonal plates formed in this hydrothermal synthesis.

Figure 2
figure 2

Electron Micrographs of CuS hexagonal plates. FESEM image (a), TEM image (b), HRTEM image with incident beam from the <001 > direction (c) and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) pattern (d) of CuS hexagonal plates.

The bulk elemental composition of the as-synthesized powder was analyzed by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) technique. XRF analysis revealed that the bulk composition of the respective powder consists of only Cu and S in which the Cu: S atomic ratio calculated is 1: 1.04. In addition, EDX analysis was conducted to probe the localized surface elemental composition of the hexagonal plates. Figure 3 depicts the multiple EDX analysis scanned at one area and different spots for the hexagonal plates synthesized. From the numerous scans of EDX spectra, the powder is found to compose Cu and S elements in which no significant contamination from other elements can be detected. As tabulated in Table 1, the respective quantified EDX spectra disclose the average atomic composition of Cu: S is closed to each other, reaching average percentage of approximately 50: 50. Both of the results attained from XRF and EDX analyses are complementary to each other and the atomic ratio of Cu and S evaluated is consistent with the ideal nominal stoichiometric ratio of covellite which is 1: 1 for Cu: S. Therefore, the bulk and localized distributions of Cu and S are in good agreement with the powder XRD and HRTEM analysis in which merely pure phase covellite (CuS) is found in the hexagonal plates.

Figure 3
figure 3

EDX analysis on CuS hexagonal plates. Area analysis (a), spot analysis (b) and (c) of CuS hexagonal plates. The related EDX spectra are labelled as Area 1A, Spot 1B to Spot 1G.

Table 1 EDX analysis on CuS hexagonal plates

Role of reaction temperature in hydrothermal synthesis

In order to attain a better understanding on the formation of phase pure CuS hexagonal plate, several experiments were carried out at different synthesis temperatures with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio fixed at 1: 2 for 12 hours. Figures 4, 5 and 6 depict the powder XRD patterns of crystalline compounds formed at 25.0, 65.0, 95.0, 125.0 and 175.0°C. At reaction temperature of 25°C, mixed phases of copper sulphate [CuSO4], krohnite [NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2], cyclooctasulphur [S8] as well as covellite [CuS] are observed in the powder XRD diffractogram. This observation strongly suggests that CuS is a thermodynamically stable compound in which under a suitable Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio (specifically 1: 2 in this study), its formation is feasible even under room temperature condition. The morphology of this mixed phase powder is shown in Figure 4b. The morphology of this sample resembles the shape of paper flower with many uniform clusters. Each cluster of the flower is surrounded by 3 or 4 thin bracts of petals.

Figure 4
figure 4

Product prepared at 25°C. Powder XRD pattern (a) and FESEM images (b) of product formed at 25°C with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 for 12 hours.

Figure 5
figure 5

Products prepared at different reaction temperatures. Powder XRD patterns (a), FESEM images of products synthesized with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 for 12 hours at 65°C (b), 95°C (c) and 125°C (d).

Figure 6
figure 6

Product prepared at 175°C. Powder XRD pattern (a) and FESEM images (b) of product synthesized at 175°C with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 for 12 hours.

As reaction temperature was increased to 65.0°C, both of the CuS and S8 phases are identified while NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2 and CuSO4 disappeared from the diffractogram. For NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2 and CuSO4 phases, they are determined to be slightly and highly soluble in water respectively [34, 35]. For both CuS (Ksp = 8 x 10-37) and S8, they tend to have low solubility in water even with solution temperature elevation [36, 37]. A preferential dissolution of NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2 and CuSO4 occurred in water during the reaction. Thus, the retention of both CuS and S8 as well as the disappearance of NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)2 and CuSO4 in the product are closely related to their solubility in water at increasing temperature. The morphology of the sample has changed from the flower-like (at 25.0°C) to ball-like structures as indicated in Figure 5b. As reaction temperature was further increased to 95.0 and 125.0°C, the CuS phase is still accompanied by S8 phase in the powder XRD patterns. Even with relatively higher temperature applied, the crystalline S8 peak at 2θ = 23° is becoming less intense as compared to the diffractogram at 65.0°C. This indicates that S8 impurity has not been completely decomposed even at 125°C. Moreover, the morphology of the ball-like structures synthesized at 95.0 and 125.0°C remained similar as the product formed at 65.0°C. This result signifies that the growth of hexagonal plate-like structure cannot be achieved if reaction temperature is not elevated high enough to decompose the S8 impurity phase.

In fact, the decomposition of S8 is estimated at 149.5°C in which a complete breaking of crown S8 ring might be expected [38]. In order to investigate the optimum temperature in eliminating S8 phase without affecting CuS phase in the powder, phase pure CuS hexagonal plates obtained at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 was subjected to thermal treatment under a controlled flow of 100% Ar gas. From the TG-DSC curves (Figure 7), the thermal decomposition of CuS can be divided into three major steps based on the DSC endotherm observed. The first decomposition step is identified in the temperature range of 38.0 – 165.0°C in which a shallow broad DSC endotherm is detected. This event is attributed to desorption of physisorbed water from CuS crystal as the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 18 was evidenced from the MS signal. The second decomposition step is found in the temperature range of 217.0 – 348.0°C in which a well-defined DSC endotherm is associated. This event can be related well to desorption of crystallization water as mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of 18 was again evidenced from the MS signal. The third decomposition step is identified in the temperature range of 345.0 – 470.0°C in which a huge mass loss of the sample (≈ 12.0%) as well as the sharp DSC endotherm is observed. Since no significant MS signal is detected, an endothermic event that involves the crystallographic changes from CuS phase to other CuxS phases is deduced. From the analysis, it is obvious that the as-formed CuS phase at 25.0°C will not be affected if reaction temperature is maintained below 300.0°C. Furthermore, the synthesis conducted at 175°C also discloses that the microstructure of CuS hexagonal plates (Figure 6) remains as no obvious change in the morphology can be detected at this temperature. Thus, these results strongly suggest that the CuS hexagonal phase is retained as a single phase product if the decomposition of S8 ring impurity is performed in the range of 155.0 – 300.0°C. Therefore, the highlighted observations have shown that reaction temperature plays an important role in controlling the phase purity, crystal phase as well as morphology of the final product in the hydrothermal synthesis developed.

Figure 7
figure 7

Thermal decomposition of CuS hexagonal plates in the absence of oxidative condition. TG-MS-DSC curves on CuS hexagonal plates under 100% Ar gas.

Role of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio in hydrothermal synthesis

It has been identified previously that the variation of synthesis temperature is vital in directing the final crystal phase and morphology of the product. It is also found that pure CuS hexagonal phase can only be achieved if the synthesis is performed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 under the reaction temperature of 155.0°C. In this section, we further investigated the role of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio in the formation of copper sulphide via the variation of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio under the typical synthesis condition. The powder XRD patterns of the products formed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1 and 1: 1.5 are displayed in Figure 8a; while the powder XRD patterns of the powder produced at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2.5, 1: 3 and 1: 5 are depicted in Figure 9a.

Figure 8
figure 8

Products prepared at different Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio. Powder XRD patterns (a), FESEM images of products synthesized at 155°C for 12 hours with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1 (b) and 1: 1.5 (c).

Figure 9
figure 9

Products prepared at different Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio. Powder XRD patterns (a), FESEM images of products synthesized at 155°C for 12 hours with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2.5 (b), 1: 3 (c) and 1: 5 (d).

In general, sharp and narrow peaks are observed from all the diffractograms signifying the formation of highly crystalline compounds. For the synthesis performed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1. However, phase pure natrochalcite [NaCu2(SO4)(H2O)] product with irregular plate-like morphology is detected (Figure 8b). For the synthesis performed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1.5, the diffraction peak of CuS phase is again not detected. Nevertheless, phase pure digenite (Cu9S5) with irregular platelet-like morphology is in fact identified (Figure 8c). For the synthesis conducted at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ration of 1: 2.5, 1: 3 and 1: 5, both mixed phases of CuS and S8 are identified from their powder XRD patterns. In comparison of the products formed at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ration of 1: 2.5, 1: 3 and 1: 5, more intense crystalline S8 peaks are detected from the XRD patterns when higher Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio was applied which indicates that higher amount of S8 is present in the system. From the FESEM images (Figure 9b-c), it is amazed to notice that the products obtained at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ration of 1: 2.5 and 1: 3 show crystalline hexagonal plate morphology although certain degree of S8 impurity was detected in the system. Nevertheless, the crystalline hexagonal plate morphology is found to be reduced significantly when Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio was increased to 1: 5 in which a substantial amount of solid mass can be observed from the FESEM image depicted in Figure 9d. From the appealing observations found in this investigation, it can be deduced that the extensive growth of crystalline S8 has an inhibiting effect towards the growth of CuS hexagonal plate architecture. The amplified growth of crystalline S8 in the synthesis of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 5 has dominated the development of CuS hexagonal plates. Consequently, this has led to the coverage of crystalline S8 on CuS surface which resulted in a more coarsened morphology detected at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 5.

In this work, efforts have been put to correlate the experimental observations with the chemical reactions occurred. Pryor et. al. reported that S 2 O 3 2 undergoes irreversible disproportionation in water to produce HS-, S O 4 2 and a small amount of S8 species as indicated in equation (1) [39].

S 2 O 3 2 + H 2 O SO 4 2 + HS + H +

On the other hand, an examination of the S8 species in basic solution revealed that S 2 O 3 2 , HS- and S O 4 2 species can be produced as shown in the following [40, 41]:

S 8 + 8 OH 2 S 2 O 3 2 + 4 HS + 2 H 2 O
S 8 + 10 OH 2 SO 4 2 + 6 HS + 2 H 2 O

The reactions shown in equations (2) and (3) are reversible due to the presence of large amount of HS- and S O 4 2 species in the solution. Thus, the overall reaction which led to the formation of S8 species can be summarized as below:

S 2 O 3 2 + SO 4 2 + 5 HS + 2 H 2 O S 8 + 9 OH

As indicated above, the resulting reaction equilibrium is shifted towards the formation of S8 species. Its presence has been evidenced by powder XRD technique at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2.5, 1: 3 and 1: 5 during the hydrothermal treatment.

For reaction conducted at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1, the formation of NaCu2(SO4)(H2O) with irregular plate-like morphology has been detected. This observation can be explained via the presence of large amount of S O 4 2 species in the reaction. From equation (4), 5 mole of HS- reacted with 1 mole of S O 4 2 in the formation of S8 species. The consumption of HS- is 5 times higher than S O 4 2 in the S8 species formation pathway. In addition, it is well known that HS- species is reactive and is rapidly oxidized by dissolved oxygen in water to form S O 4 2 species. Therefore, it is expected that the formation of NaCu2(SO4)(H2O) is more feasible in relative to CuS with the presence of excessive amount of S O 4 2 species in the system. For synthesis carried out at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1.5, digenite (Cu9S5) with platelet-like morphology was identified. Its formation can be closely related to the slight increased of active HS- present in the solution. An increase in Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio undeniably elevates the quantity of active HS-. It is believed that the increased amount of HS- used to precipitate digenite (Cu9S5) has outpaced the formation of crystalline S8 but it is still insufficient in precipitating CuS. Thus, this has eventually led to the formation of metastable state copper sulphide, namely Cu9S5 when Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 1.5 was applied in this reaction.

For synthesis conducted at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2.5 and 1: 3, mixture of CuS and S8 phases with crystalline hexagonal plate morphology has been observed. However, when Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio was raised to 1: 5, an increase amount of S8 phase in relative to CuS phase is detected. From equation (1), it is obvious that an increase amount of S 2 O 3 2 used will amplify the contribution of S O 4 2 and HS- species. Subsequently, a greater conversion of S 2 O 3 2 and S O 4 2 into S8 will be expected based on disproportionation reaction shown in equation (4). The reaction pathway proposed is in good agreement with the product formed because the additional S8 phase identified is significantly increased in the powder synthesized at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 3 and 1: 5. Therefore, it is considerably important to employ an appropriate Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio for the growth of phase pure CuS hexagonal plates in the reaction.

Role of reaction time in hydrothermal synthesis

For the reaction time studies, investigations were further carried out at synthesis time of 1, 3 and 8 hours to determine the minimum time required to achieve phase pure CuS formation under Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 at 155.0°C. The powder XRD patterns and morphology of the products formed at different synthesis time were depicted in Figure 10a-d respectively. At reaction time of 1 hour, phase mixtures of covellite and cyclooctasulphur were found in its powder XRD pattern. This observation is coupled with the absence of hexagonal shaped particles (Figure 10b) as well as the appearance of big solid mass detected from FESEM analysis. This finding strongly suggests that reaction time of 1 hour is insufficient to promote the formation of highly crystalline CuS hexagonal plates and complete decomposition of cyclooctasulphur under the hydrothermal synthesis.

Figure 10
figure 10

Products prepared at different reaction time. Powder XRD patterns (a), FESEM images of products synthesized with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 at 155°C for 1 hour (b), 3 hours (c) and 8 hours (d).

As the reaction time was prolonged to 3 and 8 hours, it can be observed that only covellite phase is remained while cyclooctasulphur has been diminished entirely from the powder XRD patterns. This observation is associated with the single morphology of hexagonal shaped particles identified from FESEM analysis. These results again indicate that the decomposition of cyclooctasulphur occurs during the hydrothermal treatment at 155°C in which reaction time of 3 hours is enough to eliminate this impurity completely. Further analysis of the powder XRD pattern for the pure phase CuS synthesized has been carried out using Scherrer Formula (1918) [42]:

D = k λ / β cos θ

where D is the average crystallite size, k is the Scherrer constant (0.94), λ is the X-ray wavelength (0.15406 nm for CuKα), β is the angular linewidth of half maximum intensity (FWHM) in radians unit, θ is the Bragg angle corresponding to the maximum of the diffraction peak in degrees unit. The average crystallite size of the as-formed CuS phase at reaction time of 3, 8 and typically 12 hours were estimated as (31.49 ± 1.44), (34.80 ± 1.59), and (44.94 ± 2.37) nm respectively. This observation implies that the process of crystallite growth is in favour when synthesis time is lengthened. In fact, the trend of increasing crystallite size with time is also found when comparing the powder XRD patterns of these three products. The diffraction peaks of the respective compounds have become sharper with time, indicating that more crystalline material with larger size was obtained when reaction time was prolonged.

Formation mechanism of CuS hexagonal plates

From the studies above, it is identified that the formation of CuS crystal phase can be obtained at almost all synthesis conditions studied (variation of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 to 1: 5, reaction temperature of 25 to 155°C and reaction time of 1 to 12 hours). These results indicate that the CuS crystal phase is a thermodynamically stable compound in which under a suitable Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio, its formation is feasible regardless of the synthesis temperature and reaction time applied. In the reaction between Cu(NO3)2 and Na2S2O3, it is reasonable to consider that the main CuS formation pathway proceeds firstly via the relatively stable [Cu(S2O3)(H2O)2] and [Cu(S2O3)2]2- complexes formation [21, 43].

Cu 2 + + 2 S 2 O 3 2 Cu S 2 O 3 2 2
Cu 2 + + S 2 O 3 2 + 2 H 2 O Cu S 2 O 3 2 H 2 O 2

A subsequent disproportionation reaction takes place in the complexes mentioned above resulting in a complete dissociation of Cu2+, SO42- and S2- in the next step.

Cu S 2 O 3 2 2 + H 2 O Cu 2 + + SO 4 2 + S 2 + 2 H +
Cu S 2 O 3 2 H 2 O 2 Cu 2 + + SO 4 2 + S 2 + 2 H + + H 2 O

The key step of CuS formation is suggested to be an in situ reduction of Cu2+ to Cu+ ion and oxidation of S2- to S- and S22- species when bare S2- is reacting with Cu2+ ion.

3 Cu 2 + + 3 S 2 3 Cu + + S + S 2 2 Cu + 3 S S 2 2

It can be observed that the final reaction shown is not a simple balanced charged reaction that resulted from Cu2+ and S2-. In fact, the crystal structure of covellite (CuS) has been evidenced by single crystal experiment in which it is composed of (Cu)3(S)(S2) [44]. The assignment of formal charges of Cu+, S- and S 2 2 was actually based on the interpretation from X-Ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [45]. In addition, the presence of Cu(I) instead of Cu(II) in the crystal lattice was also proven from X-Ray photoelectron (XPS) and X-ray absorption spectroscopic (NEXAFS) studies [33, 46]. Taking the monovalency of all copper atoms into account, covellite should not be regarded as Cu (II) sulphide [33]. Therefore, the mechanism deduction which involves the formation of covellite should be based on its molecular formula, (Cu+)3(S)(S2)2- rather than its empirical formula, CuS. The key reaction should consist of a series of redox reactions which build up the core crystal unit of Cu+, S and (S2)2- in the final crystal system.

For any crystallite formation, it is renowned that both of the nucleation and growth process play important roles in determining the morphology of the product formed. For the case of CuS hexagonal plate-like architecture, it is believed that its formation is closely related to the crystallographic phase of the seed formed during the nucleation process and its surface selective crystallization in the growth process. The formation of platelet-like CuS seed has been expected in the reaction due to the intrinsic anisotropic characteristics of the CuS hexagonal crystal structure [20, 22]. In the subsequent growth stage, the platelet-like seed will grow in a different rate along the planes due to the different surface energy distribution. It was reported that hexagonal metal with a c/a ratio greater than 1.63, surface energy at {101} and {100} surfaces will be 1.5 times greater compared to {001} facets [47]. Similarly, the c/a ratio of CuS is determined to be 4.31 in which an even higher surface energy will be expected at {101} and {100} surfaces [22]. This has induced a relatively fast crystal growth at these facets and resulting in a hexagonal shape particle instead of rod-like particle being observed in the powder [48]. Finally, the formation of stacked-like CuS hexagonal plate morphology can be considered as a typical Ostwald ripening process. Owing to the higher surface energy of small seed crystal, its dissolution and re-deposition onto the larger hexagonal platelet surfaces at different orientation arise during the reaction. The extensive growth of the small seed crystal at bigger dimension of hexagonal plate has resulted in the perpendicular intersection of the platelet-like structure. This process has eventually led to the formation of stacked-like CuS hexagonal plate morphology as depicted in the final powder obtained.


Via the optimization of reaction parameters in hydrothermal reactions between copper (II) nitrate and sodium thiosulphate without appending any assistant agent, it is found that CuS hexagonal plates can be successfully synthesized at Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio of 1: 2 under reaction temperature of 155°C for 12 hours. FESEM and TEM examinations confirmed that the CuS hexagonal plates architecture are assembled, stacked and interlaced perpendicular to each other with an mean edge length of 1 μm and thickness of 100 nm. The reactions between copper (II) nitrate and sodium thiosulphate at different synthesis conditions produce a wide range of crystal phases in addition to the covellite (CuS) phase in which a systematic approach is required to decompose the impurities. It is identified that both the reaction temperature and time are important parameters in decomposing the impurities present. Whilst, Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio is playing a vital role in controlling the amount of cyclooctasulphur (S8) present in the final powder obtained. A possible formation mechanism of CuS hexagonal plates based on the presence of Cu (I) instead of Cu (II) species in the crystal structure of covellite (CuS) was also proposed. This facile and mild hydrothermal batch route developed provides a promising new methodology in studying the reaction chemistry of aqueous solution phase reactants as well as synthesizing phase pure CuS hexagonal plates.


Synthesis and formation studies of CuS hexagonal plates

All reagents used in this study are of analytical grade, obtained from commercial market and were used without further purification. Sodium thiosulphate pentahydrate (Na2S2O3.5H2O, Merck) was selected as the sulphur source while copper nitrate pentasemihydrate (Cu(NO3)2.2½ H2O, Riedel de Häen) was used as the copper source. In a typical procedure, CuS was synthesized by reacting 0.025 mol of copper nitrate with 0.05 mol of sodium thiosulphate ( Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio = 1: 2.0) in 40.00 ml deionized water. The solutions were mixed thoroughly under constant stirring for 15 minutes; homogeneous slurry was formed, which was then transferred into a sealed 100 ml Teflon-lined stainless steel tube and put into a custom-made rotating furnace. The rotating furnace was maintained at 155.0°C for 12 hours. To measure the synthesis temperature during the reaction, a thermocouple was placed inside the furnace every hour through an injection port without opening the furnace. After 12 hours, the Teflon-lined stainless steel tube was allowed to cool down naturally at ambient temperature. The obtained product was washed with batches of deionized water until the final filtrate showed conductivity of less than 10 μS/cm. The collected product was then dried overnight at ambient temperature in a vacuum desiccator which consists of silica gels as drying agent. After that, the dried sample was purged with purified nitrogen gas for 3 minutes prior storage to prevent the oxidation of the sample [49]. In order to study the role of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio, the synthesis was varied in the range of Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio = 1: 1–1: 5 at 155°C for 12 hours where the number of mole of copper nitrate employed was fixed at 0.025 mol. Meanwhile, the role of synthesis temperature was investigated by controlling the furnace temperature at 25, 65, 95, 125 and 175°C by keeping the other synthesis parameters at constant. The studies on reaction time parameter were examined at 1, 3 and 8 hours with Cu 2 + : S 2 O 3 2 mole ratio and synthesis temperature fixed at 1: 2 and 155°C.

Characterization and analysis of solid samples

The crystalline phase and purity of the synthesized products were identified by powder X-ray Diffraction (XRD), using a Bruker X-ray Diffraction Model D-8 equipped with a Cu Kα monochromatized radiation source (λ = 1.5406 Å) in the range of 4° ≤ 2θ ≤ 80°. Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (FESEM) images and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) were done by using FEI Quanta 200 FESEM. The bulk elemental composition of the material was determined by X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) spectrometer by Bruker (S4-Explorer). TEM and HRTEM images were recorded from a FEI Cs-corrected Titan 80–300 microscope operated at 300 kV. The TG/ DSC results were acquired using NETZSCH STA 449C device coupled with Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Thermostar, Balzers). A heating rate of 5°C min-1 with mass flow of 30 cm3 min-1 was applied in investigating the thermal property of the product.


  1. Wang YY, Li Q, Nie M, Li XL, Li Y, Zhong XL: High-yield room temperature route to copper sulfide hollow nanospheres and their electrochemical properties. Nanotechnology. 2011, 22: 305401-305406. 10.1088/0957-4484/22/30/305401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li F, Wu JF, Qin QH, Li Z, Huang XT: Controllable synthesis, optical and photocatalytic properties of CuS nanomaterials with hierarchical structures. Powder Technol. 2010, 198: 267-274. 10.1016/j.powtec.2009.11.018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Erokhina S, Erokhin V, Nicolini C, Sbrana F, Ricci D, di Zitti E: Microstructure origin of the conductivity differences in aggregated CuS films of different thickness. Langmuir. 2003, 19: 766-771. 10.1021/la026433s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan ZG, Zhu Q, Guo XZ, Zhang JF, Wu WY, Liu AP: Synthesis of flower-shaped CuS microsphere superstructures by a solvothermal route and its photocatalytic properties. Acta Chim Sin. 2011, 69: 2812-2820.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu XL, An XQ: Controllable hydrothermal synthesis of Cu2S nanowires on the copper substrate. Mater Lett. 2010, 64: 252-254. 10.1016/j.matlet.2009.10.051.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sagade AA, Sharma R: Copper sulphide (CuxS) as an ammonia gas sensor working at room temperature. Sensor Actuat B- Chem. 2008, 133: 135-143. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.02.015.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reijnen L, Meester B, Goossens A, Schoonman J: Atomic layer deposition of CuxS for solar energy conversion. Chem Vapor Depos. 2003, 9: 15-20. 10.1002/cvde.200290001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chung JS, Sohn HJ: Electrochemical behaviors of CuS as a cathode material for lithium secondary batteries. J Power Sources. 2002, 108: 226-231. 10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00024-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang P, Gao L: Copper sulfide flakes and nanodisks. J Mater Chem. 2003, 13: 2007-2010. 10.1039/b305584a.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh KV, Martinez-Morales AA, Bozhilov KN, Ozkan M: A simple way of synthesizing single-crystalline semiconducting copper sulfide nanorods by using ultrasonication during template-assisted electrodeposition. Chem Mater. 2007, 19: 2446-2454. 10.1021/cm0629356.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu T, Xia B, Zhou L, Wen Lou X: Arrays of ultrafine CuS nanoneedles supported on a CNT backbone for application in supercapacitors. J Mater Chem. 2012, 22: 7851-7855. 10.1039/c2jm30437f.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy P, Srivastava SK: Hydrothermal growth of CuS nanowires from Cu − dithiooxamide, a novel single-source precursor. Cryst Growth & Des. 2006, 6: 1921-1926. 10.1021/cg060134+.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu Q, Gao F, Zhao D: One-step synthesis and assembly of copper sulfide nanoparticles to nanowires, nanotubes, and nanovesicles by a simple organic amine-assisted hydrothermal process. Nano Lett. 2002, 2: 725-728. 10.1021/nl025551x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang Q, Li J-X, Li G-D, Cao X-J, Wang K-J, Chen J-S: Formation of CuS nanotube arrays from CuCl Nanorods through a gas-solid reaction route. J Cryst Growth. 2007, 299: 386-392. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.11.304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y-B, Chen L, Wu L-M: Water-induced thermolytic formation of homogeneous core − shell CuS microspheres and their shape retention on desulfurization. Cryst Growth & Des. 2008, 8: 2736-2740. 10.1021/cg700838s.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zeng H, Rice PM, Wang SX, Sun S: Shape-controlled synthesis and shape-induced texture of MnFe2O4 Nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2004, 126: 11458-11459. 10.1021/ja045911d.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Song Q, Zhang ZJ: Shape control and associated magnetic properties of spinel cobalt ferrite nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc. 2004, 126: 6164-6168. 10.1021/ja049931r.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao YC: Synthesis of square gadolinium-oxide nanoplates. J Am Chem Soc. 2004, 126: 7456-7457. 10.1021/ja0481676.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen S, Carroll DL: Synthesis and characterization of truncated triangular silver nanoplates. Nano Lett. 2002, 2: 1003-1007. 10.1021/nl025674h.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Du W, Qian X, Ma X, Gong Q, Cao H, Yin J: Shape-controlled synthesis and self-assembly of hexagonal covellite (CuS) nanoplatelets. Chem Eur J. 2007, 13: 3241-3247. 10.1002/chem.200601368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu LM, Zhou BB, Mu HC, Sun YZ, Xu P: Mild hydrothermal synthesis of hexagonal CuS nanoplates. J Cryst Growth. 2008, 310: 5437-5440. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu Y, Qin D, Wang L, Cao Y: A facile solution route to CuS hexagonal nanoplatelets. Mater Chem Phys. 2007, 102: 201-206. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.12.004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Basu M, Sinha AK, Pradhan M, Sarkar S, Negishi Y, Govind , Pal T: Evolution of hierarchical hexagonal stacked plates of CuS from liquid − liquid interface and its photocatalytic application for oxidative degradation of different dyes under indoor lighting. Environ Sci Technol. 2010, 44: 6313-6318. 10.1021/es101323w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Y, Wang H, Wang B, Yan H, Yoshimura M: Low-temperature hydrothermal synthesis of pure metastable γ-manganese sulfide (MnS) crystallites. J Cryst Growth. 2002, 243: 214-217. 10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01495-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Demazeau G: Solvothermal processes: a route to the stabilization of new materials. J Mater Chem. 1999, 9: 15-18. 10.1039/a805536j.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang S, Zavalij PY, Stanley Whittingham M: Hydrothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate cathodes. Electrochem Commun. 2001, 3: 505-508. 10.1016/S1388-2481(01)00200-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoshimura M: Importance of soft solution processing for advanced inorganic materials. J Mater Res. 1998, 13: 796-802. 10.1557/JMR.1998.0101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen J, Deng S, She J, Xu N, Zhang W, Wen X, Yang S: Effect of structural parameter on field emission properties of semiconducting copper sulphide nanowire films. J Appl Phys. 2003, 93: 1774-1777. 10.1063/1.1536739.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brelle MC, Torres-Matinez CL, McNulty JC, Mehra RK, Zhang JZ: Synthesis and characterization of CuxS nanoparticles. Nature of the infrared band and charge-carrier dynamics. Pure Appl Chem. 2000, 72: 101-117. 10.1351/pac200072010101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tsamouras D, Dalas E, Sakkopoulos S, Koutsoukos PG: Preparation and characterization of Cu(II), Zn(II) sulfides obtained by spontaneous precipitation in electrolyte solutions. Langmuir. 1998, 14: 5298-5304. 10.1021/la9711793.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gao J, Li Q, Zhao H, Li L, Liu C, Gong Q, Qi L: One-pot synthesis of uniform Cu2O and CuS hollow spheres and their optical limiting properties. Chem Mater. 2008, 20: 6263-6269. 10.1021/cm801407q.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kore RH, Kulkarni JS, Haram SK: Effect of nonionic surfactants on the kinetics of disproportion of copper sulfide nanoparticles in the aqueous sols. Chem Mater. 2001, 13: 1789-1793. 10.1021/cm010013r.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Goh SW, Buckley AN, Lamb RN: Copper(II) sulfide?. Miner. Eng. 2006, 19: 204-208. 10.1016/j.mineng.2005.09.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Anthony JW, Bideaux RA, Bladh KW, Nichols MC: Handbook of Mineralogy. 2003, Chantilly: Mineralogical Society of America

    Google Scholar 

  35. International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS): International Chemical Safety Card 0751 - Copper (II) sulfate. Retrieved 27/11/2012. 0751,, - Copper (II) sulfate. Retrieved 27/11/2012.

  36. Solubility Product Constants.

  37. Kamyshny A: Goldschmidt abstracts 2010 – solubility of cycloctasulfur in water as a function of temperature, salinity and sulfide concentration. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2010, 74: A493-

    Google Scholar 

  38. Cernosek Z, Holubova J, Cernoskova E, Ruzicka A: Sulfur–a new information on this seemingly well-known element. J Non-oxide Glasses. 2009, 1: 38-42.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pryor WA: The kinetics of the disproportionation of sodium thiosulfate to sodium sulfide and sulfate. J Am Chem Soc. 1960, 82: 4794-4797. 10.1021/ja01503a010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Pryor WA: Kinetics of the oxidation of m-toluic acid to isophthalic acid by aqueous sulfur solutions. J Am Chem Soc. 1958, 80: 6481-6486. 10.1021/ja01557a003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Parker AJ, Kharasch N: The scission of the sulfur-sulfur bond. Chem Rev. 1959, 59: 583-628. 10.1021/cr50028a003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Scherrer P: Bestimmung der grösse und der inneren struktur von kolloidteilchen mittels röntgenstrahlen. Nachr Ges Wiss Göttingen. 1918, 26: 98-100.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zhang YC, Qiao T, Hu XY: A simple hydrothermal route to nanocrystalline CuS. J Cryst Growth. 2004, 268: 64-70. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.04.118.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Evans H, Konnert J: Crystal structure refinement of covellite. Am Mineral. 1976, 61: 996-1000.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Folmer JCW, Jellinek F: The valence of copper in sulphides and selenides: An X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study. J Less Common Met. 1980, 76: 153-10.1016/0022-5088(80)90019-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Pattrick RAD, Mosselmans JFW, Charnock JM, England KER, Helz GR, Garner CD, Vaughan DJ: The structure of amorphous copper sulfide precipitates: an X-ray absorption study. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1997, 61: 2023-2036. 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00061-6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Matysina ZA: The relative surface energy of hexagonal close-packed crystals. Mater Chem Phys. 1999, 60: 70-78. 10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00050-4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Peng XG, Manna L, Yang WD, Wickham J, Scher E, Kadavanich A, Alivisatos AP: Shape control of CdSe nanocrystals. Nature. 2000, 404: 59-61. 10.1038/35003535.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Yap PL, Auyoong YL, Kutty MG, Timpe O, Behrens M, Abd Hamid SB: Facile remediation method of copper sulfide by nitrogen pre-treatment. Advanced Materials Research. 2012, 361: 1445-1450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was financially supported by University of Malaya under University Malaya Research Grant (RG 022-09AET) and Postgraduate Research Fund (PS 376-2010B and PS 377-2010B).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharifah Bee Abd Hamid.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YLA has carried out conceptual studies on the formation mechanism of CuS and participated in the manuscript preparation. PLY carried out the synthesis, data analysis on the compounds formed, and helped in the manuscript preparation. XH involved in HRTEM data acquisition and interpretation, as well as manuscript revision. SBAH provided idea and participated in the design of copper sulphide. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Yow Loo Auyoong, Pei Lay Yap, Xing Huang and Sharifah Bee Abd Hamid contributed equally to this work.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Auyoong, Y.L., Yap, P.L., Huang, X. et al. Optimization of reaction parameters in hydrothermal synthesis: a strategy towards the formation of CuS hexagonal plates. Chemistry Central Journal 7, 67 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: