- Research
- Open access
- Published:
A robust acid-resistant chelating polymer for enhanced stabilization of lead ions in fly ash
BMC Chemistry volume 18, Article number: 103 (2024)
Abstract
Fly ash derived from municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs) harbors significant quantities of heavy metals with high leaching toxicity, resulting in detrimental environmental effects. Pb2+ in fly ash is the ion most likely to exceed permissible levels. However, chemical stabilization methods demonstrate poor efficacy in stabilizing Pb2+ under acidic conditions. Herein, we have developed a robust acid-resistant chelating polymer (25DTF) for enhanced stabilization of Pb2+ in fly ash. 25DTF was synthesized through the reaction of formaldehyde with 2,5-dithiourea. 25DTF exhibited remarkable chelation efficiency, nearing 100%, for Pb2+ in fly ash. 25DTF demonstrated exceptional chelation efficiency, surpassing 99.9%, when interacting with Pb2+ in fly ash at pH ≤ 7. Even under acidic conditions, 25DTF effectively prevented the secondary dissolution of Pb2+. Additionally, it indicated outstanding Pb2+ chelation efficiency across diverse regions of China. The 25DTF chelating agent shows considerable potential in alleviating metal ion contamination in soil, wastewater, and urban environmental management, thereby fostering advancements in environmental stewardship.
Introduction
Municipal solid waste (MSW) has become a significant threat to environmental stability and sustainable progress, attributable to the expansion of economies and urban populations [1]. The current global waste production surpasses 2 billion tons annually and is projected to escalate to 3.4 billion tons by the year 2050 [2, 3]. Municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) technology is widely recognized and highly valued as a waste management solution, owing to its superior treatment capacity, excellent waste reduction capabilities, integrated environmental safety measures, and heat recovery benefits. [4, 5]. However, MSWI generates fly ash containing heavy metals with high leaching toxicity, including Cu2+, Zn2+, and Pb2+, thereby raising environmental concerns [6,7,8].
Heavy metals exhibit a propensity for continuous migration and environmental alteration. Contaminated soil and water environments lack inherent self-purification mechanisms, while microorganisms are unable to degrade heavy metals, allowing them to accumulate within the biological chain. Mishandling of fly ash can result in the dispersion of pollutants and heavy metals into the environment, posing significant risks to both human health and the integrity of the natural ecosystem. Pb2+ is widely acknowledged as a toxic pollutant on a global scale and is frequently found in fly ash. According to the GB16889-2008 “Pollution Control Standards for Domestic Waste Landfills”, the allowable Pb2+ content in fly ash leachate should not exceed 0.25 mg/L [9]. Hence, it is imperative to develop methods for treating heavy metal ions in fly ash.
Various methods have been developed to address Pb2+ in fly ash, including solidification using cement, melt solidification, and chemical stabilization techniques. The method of cement solidification accomplishes Pb2+ removal by forming stable compounds on the surface of cement-hydrated silicate colloids [10,11,12,13]. However, this method exhibits weak integration capacity and poor stability. Melt solidification is another feasible alternative [14], but it is related to elevated energy expenditure and cost [15,16,17]. Therefore, it is important to develop a cost-effective and efficacious approach for treating Pb2+ present in fly ash.
Chemical stability has attracted much attention due to its advantages such as harmlessness of waste and small volume increase after treatment [18,19,20]. Na2S was utilized to remove heavy metal ions from soil, achieving a removal efficiency for Cd2+ ranging from 69 to 84% [21, 22]. Chelating agents such as strong inorganic acids, ammonia salts and organic acids have the advantages of low cost and simplicity, eliminating hazardous metals from waste fly ash [23, 24]. However, conventional stabilization technologies still have some shortcomings that require resolution, including the challenge of stably chelating Pb2+ under acidic conditions, achieving long-term stability of heavy metals across a wide pH range, and the necessity for large quantities of reagents. The leaching behavior of heavy metals is influenced by factors such as ash properties, leachate pH, leachate type, and microorganisms. The issue of leaching heavy metal ions from fly ash continues to be a focal point of current research. The quest for efficient chelating agents to immobilize Pb2+ in fly ash while mitigating secondary leaching under acidic conditions remains a significant challenge.
We have developed for the first time a robust acid-resistant chelating polymer (25DTF) for enhanced stabilization of Pb2+ in fly ash (Scheme 1). 25DTF was synthesized by reacting formaldehyde with 2,5-dithiourea. The monomer contains two carbon–sulfur bonds, resulting in a significantly higher chelating capacity for Pb2+. The chelation efficiency of 25DTF for Pb2+ in fly ash was exceptionally high, reaching 100%. Importantly, there was no risk of secondary dissolution of Pb2+, even under acidic conditions. 25DTF has exhibited excellent chelation efficiency for Pb2+ across different regions, making it highly promising for applications in soil and wastewater treatment.
Material and methods
Materials
2,5-Dithiodiurea (AR, CAS:142-46-1) was procured from the Aladdin Reagent Company, formaldehyde (AR, CAS: 50-00-0) from the Xi’an Chemical Reagent Company, sodium hydroxide (AR, CAS:1310-73-2) was procured from the Damao Chemical Reagent Company and hydrochloric acid (AR; CAS:7647-01-0) from the Chengdu Kelon Reagent Company. MSWI fly ash from Hebei, Shandong, Guangdong and Sichuan were provided by Chengdu Heng Xinhe Environmental Protection Technology Company.
Synthesis of 25DTF
The synthesis procedure for 25DTF was conducted (Fig. 1): A three-necked round-bottom flask was charged with a mixture of 7.5 g of 2,5-dithiodiurea and 4.6 mL of formaldehyde. The mixture was heated with magnetic stirring (Speed Control 85–2 type constant temperature magnetic stirrer manufactured, Shanghai Silo Instrument Company), and the pH was adjusted to 9 by adding a 20% NaOH solution. Subsequently, the mixture was stirred for 30 min at 60 °C. Then, the pH was lowered to 5 by adding a 20% HCl solution, and the reaction mixture was stirred in an oil bath at 80 °C for 5 h. Once the reaction was complete, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and then dried to obtain 25DTF.
The 25DTF resin was synthesized through the amine-formaldehyde reaction, which included processes of hydroxymethylation (A) and condensation (B). During the condensation process, hydroxymethyl compounds led to the formation of either methylene or dimethylene ether bridges. Consequently, 25DTF existed in two structural forms.
Characterization of 25DTF
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) analysis was conducted to verify the successful synthesis of 25DTF. NMR images of 25DTF were recorded by using a JNM-ECS 400 M (JEOL, Japan), 25DTF (50 mg) was dissolved of in 0.5 mL of DMSO-d6. (1H RF frequency: 399.782MHZ; 13C RF frequency: 100.525MHZ. Contact time: 2.0 ms, Number of scans: 1024, Delay time: 5 s, Sampling time: 34.5 ms)).
Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were conducted to confirm the successful preparation of 25DTF using a Nicolet NEXUS 670 infrared spectrophotometer (Nicolet, NEXUS 670, USA). 1 mg of 25DTF was weighed and then mixed with 100 mg of dry KBr, and subsequently compacted into a 10 mm transparent sheet using a tablet press. FT-IR spectra were obtained from the sheet in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1 with a data acquisition rate of 4 cm−1 per point and Automatic smoothing.
Raman spectrometer was employed to assess the successful preparation of 25DTF. Specifically, 20 mg of 25DTF was directly compressed into a tablet from the powder sample, and then placed on a slide for analysis using the Lab RAM HR Evolution instrument (HORIBA FRANCE SAS, France) to characterize the 25DTF.
The removal effect of 25DTF on Pb2+
35 g of fly ash was dissolved in 100 mL of ultrapure water. After centrifugation and filtration of the supernatant, a measured volume of the resulting liquid was taken, and 1 mL of a 25DTF solution (100 mg/mL) was added. The pH was adjusted to 7. After centrifugation, the supernatant was passed through a 0.22 μm filter membrane, and the content of heavy metal ions was determined by an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES) (Plasma Quant PQ9000, Germany). The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three experiments.
The secondary leaching of Pb2+
The fly ash filtrate was mixed with a solution containing 25DTF at a concentration of 100 mg/mL and adjusted to pH 7 before agitation and subsequent centrifugation at 10,000 rpm/min. The concentration of Pb2+ in the resulting supernatant was measured. The precipitate obtained was then mixed with 5 mL of water, and the pH was adjusted to 4. After another round of centrifugation at 10,000 rpm/min, the Pb2+ concentration in the filtrate was measured again. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three experiments.
Results and discussion
Characterization of 25DTF
The synthesis of 25DTF was evaluated by NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 2A, B). In the 1H NMR spectrum, the peak at 2.5 ppm was attributed to DMSO-d6, while the peak at 9.8 ppm corresponded to the -CH2-O bond. Additionally, the characteristic peak of N-CH2- was observed at 8.66 ppm. Furthermore, peaks at 7.3 ppm and 8.0 ppm represented the characteristic peaks of -NH- and -OH, respectively (Fig. 2A). The 13C NMR depicted a prominent C = S characteristic peak at 182 ppm, a characteristic peak of -CH2OH at 65 ppm, and another characteristic peak of -CH2- at 56 ppm. The peak at 40 ppm was attributed to DMSO-d6 (Fig. 2B). Additionally, the analysis revealed two forms of methylene groups in the prepared 25DTF: -CH2OH and -CH2-. Both exhibited negative signal peaks in the DEPT 135 spectrum (Figure S1). These findings suggested that the prepared 25DTF existed in two structural forms.
The synthesized 25DTF was characterized by FTIR and Raman spectroscopy (Fig. 2C, D). In the FTIR analysis, notable peaks for 25DTF were observed (Fig. 2C). The characteristic peaks of 25DTF were assigned at 3351 cm−1 for N–H and H–O stretching, and 1050 cm−1 for C–O–C stretching. The peak recorded was at 1510 cm−1 for N–C = S stretching. In addition, the peaks at 1460 cm−1 correspond to N–C stretching. The peaks at 1243 cm−1 in 25DTF were for C-H stretching of N–CH-N < .
The Raman spectrum of 25DTF exhibited a strong peak associated with the vibration of the C-O bond at 825 cm−1, while the N–C bond was clearly represented by peaks at 1467 cm−1. Notably, a distinctive absorption peak near 1554 cm−1, attributed to the C = S bond, was observed. Additionally, the peak at 3171 cm−1 corresponded to the N–H bond (Fig. 2D). These results confirmed the successful synthesis of 25DTF.
The effect of concentration of 25DTF on the chelation of Pb2+
The impact of 25DTF concentration on the chelation process was assessed through ICP-OES analysis (Fig. 3). It was observed that as the concentration of 25DTF increased, the concentration of Pb2+ in the fly ash decreased progressively. When the 25DTF concentration reached 100 mg/mL, the residual Pb2+ concentration in the treated fly ash was (3 × 10–4 ± 0.05) mg/L, significantly lower than the landfill standard of 0.25 mg/L, rendering it suitable for disposal. This result underscored the robust chelating capability of 25DTF for Pb2+. This could be attributed to the presence of covalently bound functional groups in the chelating agent, which contain nitrogen and sulfur atoms capable of forming stable complexes with metal ions.
The chelation capacity of 25DTF at pH ≤ 7
The chelation capacity of 25DTF at pH ≤ 7 was investigated through an ICP-OES experiment (Fig. 4). The initial concentration of Pb2+ in untreated fly ash was (151.7 ± 1.6) mg/L. Upon the addition of 25DTF, the residual Pb2+ concentrations in the treated fly ash at pH levels 2, 4, 6, and 7 were measured as (2.9 × 10–3 ± 9 × 10–6) mg/L, (2.7 × 10–3 ± 7 × 10–5) mg/L, (2.2 × 10–3 ± 5 × 10–4) mg/L, and (3 × 10–4 ± 4 × 10–4) mg/L, respectively. This observation clearly demonstrated that 25DTF achieved an outstanding chelation efficiency of over 99.9% when interacting with Pb2+ in fly ash under pH ≤ 7.
The ability to chelate Pb2+ of different chelating agents
To investigate the chelation capability of different chelating agents for Pb2+ in fly ash, an ICP-OES experiment was conducted (Fig. 5). Subsequently, 100 mg each of NaH2PO4, Di-thiocarbamate (DTC), 1,3,5-Triazine-2,4,6-trithiol trisodium salt (TMT), WTF, and 25DTF were added to 5 mL of fly ash filtrate. The chelation rates were recorded as follows: NaH2PO4 at (66.7 ± 3)%, DTC at (96.5 ± 6)%, TMT at (98.8 ± 5)%, WTF at (67.8 ± 8)%, PZ at (100 ± 10)% and 25DTF at (100 ± 2)%. This result demonstrated that 25DTF outperformed other chelating agents in efficiently capturing Pb2+ in fly ash. Organic sulfur and nitrogen compounds are commonly categorized as either soft or intermediate bases, whereas the majority of heavy metal ions are classified as intermediate acids, thereby facilitating the formation of stable chelates. Therefore, the presence of thioamide (-CS-N-) groups in 25DTF likely contributes to its excellent chelating effect. These groups enable 25DTF to bind with a larger quantity of Pb2+ in the mesh structure, effectively chelating Pb2+ in fly ash.
The secondary leaching of Pb2+ chelated from different chelators
The secondary leaching of Pb2+ chelated by different chelating agents was evaluated using ICP-OES (Fig. 6). The initial concentration of Pb2+ in fly ash was (151.7 ± 1.6) mg/L. After chelation by 25DTF at pH 7, the concentration of Pb2+ decreased to only (3 × 10–4 ± 0.05) mg/L. In contrast, the remaining Pb2+ concentration in the fly ash treated with Potassium piperazine-N, N'-bis(dithiocarboxylate) (PZ) was (0.04 ± 0.01) mg/L. Under acidic conditions (pH 4), the residual Pb2+ concentration in the fly ash treated with PZ increased to (0.45 ± 0.04) mg/L, whereas in the fly ash treated with 25DTF, it was significantly lower at (0.08 ± 0.02) mg/L. This finding highlighted the remarkable stability of 25DTF in chelating Pb2+, effectively preventing their secondary dissolution, particularly under acidic conditions.
Application of 25DTF in practical samples
A comprehensive evaluation of the chelating effect of 25DTF on Pb2+ in fly ash from Hebei, Shandong, and Guangdong provinces was conducted using ICP-OES (Fig. 7). Following the chelation process, the Pb2+ concentration in the Hebei sample treated with 25DTF decreased significantly from (53.0 ± 6) mg/L to a minimal (0.04 ± 0.05) mg/L. Similarly, in the Shandong sample, it dropped from (3.5 ± 0.1) mg/L to (0 ± 0.02) mg/L when treated with 25DTF. Likewise, in the Guangdong sample, the Pb2+ concentration decreased dramatically from (76.8 ± 1.3) mg/L to a mere (0.07 ± 0.01) mg/L when treated with 25DTF. This result suggested the potent chelating effect of 25DTF on Pb2+ presented in fly ash samples from diverse regions in China.
Conclusion
Municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) technology has garnered significant attention in waste treatment due to its superior treatment capacity, excellent waste reduction capability, and comprehensive environmental safety measures. However, the fly ash generated by MSWI contains numerous heavy metals with high leaching toxicity, posing significant environmental concerns. Pb2+ is a globally recognized toxic pollutant that poses risks to both the environment and human health. Cement solidification and melt solidification methods for the treatment of Pb2+ in fly ash suffer from drawbacks such as increased volume and high cost. The chemical stabilization method using chelating agents is cost-effective and widely accessible. However, its efficacy in stabilizing Pb2+ under acidic conditions is limited. Therefore, there is a critical need to develop a novel chelating agent capable of efficiently removing Pb2+, particularly under acidic conditions.
The novel polymeric chelating agent 25DTF was synthesized by reacting 2,5-dithiourea and formaldehyde. Its successful preparation was confirmed through analysis using NMR, FTIR, and Raman spectra. Furthermore, the chelation between 25DTF and Pb2+ displayed remarkable stability and remained unaffected by acidic conditions, achieving a chelation rate close to 100% across a wide pH range. Additionally, 25DTF exhibited superior chelation of Pb2+ in fly ash samples sourced from various regions, highlighting its substantial potential for environmental remediation purposes. The 25DTF was predominantly comprised of alkali organic compounds containing sulfur, with Pb2+ serving as intermediate acids. The principle of acid–base complementarity was utilized to link the chelating agent with the coordination bond of Pb2+, thereby facilitating the formation of a robust grid structure, restraining the leaching of Pb2+, and decreasing the Pb2+ content in fly ash. The novel chelating agent holds promising application prospects for remediating metal ions in soil and wastewater, thereby contributing to the advancement of municipal waste treatment practices.
In this study, progress has been made in the treatment technology of fly ash from domestic waste incineration. It was worth noting that the different of Pb2+ content in fly ash samples could be attributed to the composition of household waste generated in the respective regions. The synthesis process of the new polymer chelator 25DTF in our study involved the introduction of formaldehyde, the residue of which may induce toxicity. Additionally, the synthesis process required regulation of pH, and the reaction conditions were harsh. Hence, there is a pressing need to devise simple, environmentally friendly, safe, and stable chelating agents. In future studies, addressing the removal of formaldehyde residues during the synthesis of 25DTF may become a focal point of our research. Exploring efficient and straightforward methods for eliminating formaldehyde residues will be crucial in this regard. Furthermore, there is potential to optimize the preparation process of 25DTF and explore the development of a simpler and more efficient method.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Wong S, Mah AXY, Nordin AH, et al. Emerging trends in municipal solid waste incineration ashes research: a bibliometric analysis from 1994 to 2018. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:7757–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07933-y.
Czech T, Marchewicz A, Sobczyk A, et al. Heavy metals partitioning in fly ashes between various stages of electrostatic precipitator after combustion of different types of coal. Process Safe Environ Prot. 2020;133:18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.10.033.
Jiang ZQ, Yang J, Ma HW, et al. Reaction behavior of Al2O3 and SiO2 in high alumina coal fly ash during alkali hydrothermal process. T Nonfer Metal Soc. 2015;25:2065–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63816-X.
Li Y, Zhang JL, Liu ZJ, et al. Harmless treatment of municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash through shaft furnace. Waste Manage. 2021;124:110–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.039.
Zhang YY, Wang L, Chen L, et al. Treatment of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash: State-of-the-art technologies and future perspectives. J Hazard Mater. 2021;411: 125132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125132.
Li H, Liu GJ, Cao Y. Levels and environmental impact of PAHs and trace element in fly ash from a miscellaneous solid waste by rotary kiln incinerator. China Nat Hazards. 2015;76:811–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1520-x.
Jia K, Bai Y, Wang L, et al. Emulsion confinement self-assembly regulated lanthanide coordinating polymeric microparticles for multicolor fluorescent nanofibers. Polymer. 2021;230: 124043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124043.
Biswal BK, Chen Z, Yang EH. Hydrothermal process reduced Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1-driven bioleaching of heavy metals in a novel aerated concrete synthesized using municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash. Chem Eng J. 2019;360:1082–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.155.
Li WH, Sun YJ, Huang YM, et al. Evaluation of chemical speciation and environmental risk levels of heavy metals during varied acid corrosion conditions for raw and solidified/stabilized MSWI fly ash. Waste Manag. 2019;87:407–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.033.
Jia K, Ji Y, He X, et al. One-step fabrication of dual functional Tb3+ coordinated polymeric micro/nano-structures for Cr (VI) adsorption and detection. J Hazard Mater. 2022;423: 127166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127166.
Zhu Z, Zhao Y, Zhu Y, et al. Efficient treatment of mature landfill leachate with a novel composite biological trickle reactor developed using refractory domestic waste and aged refuse. J Clean Pro. 2021;305: 127194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127194.
Liu Y, Sidhu KS, Chen Z, et al. Alkali-treated incineration bottom ash as supplementary cementitiousmat erials. Constr Build Mater. 2018;179:371–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.231.
Bie R, Chen P, Song X, et al. Characteristics of municipal solid waste incineration fly ash with cement solidification treatment. J Energy Inst. 2016;89:704–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2015.04.006.
Lu S, Yang D, Ge X, et al. The internal exposure of phthalate metabolites and bisphenols in waste incineration plant workers and the associated health risks. Environ Int. 2020;145: 106101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.106101.
Ni CH, Yi CH, Feng ZY. Studies of syntheses and adsorption properties of chelating resin from thiourea and formaldehyde. J Appl Polym Sci. 2001;82:3127–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.2169.
Ma W, Chen D, Pan M, et al. Performance of chemical chelating agent stabilization and cement solidification on heavy metals in MSWI fly ash: a comparative study. J Environ Manage. 2019;247:169–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.089.
Lindberg D, Molin C, Hupa M. Thermal treatment of solid residues from WtE units: A review. Waste Manage. 2015;37:82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.009.
Wang FH, Zhang F, Chen YJ. A comparative study on the heavy metal solidification/stabilization performance of four chemical solidifying agents in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. J Hazard Mater. 2015;300:451–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.037.
Ni GH, Zhao P, Jiang YM, et al. Vitrification of MSWI Fly ash by thermal plasma melting and fate of heavy metals. Plasma Sci Technol. 2012;14:813–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1009-0630/14/9/08.
Cassano D, Zapata A, Brunetti G, et al. Comparison of several combined/integrated biological-AOPs setups for the treatment of municipal landfill leachate: minimization of operating costs and effluent toxicity. Chem Eng J. 2011;172:250–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.05.098.
Liang X, Xu Y, Wang L, et al. Sorption of Pb2+ on mercapto functionalized sepiolite. Chemosphere. 2013;90:548–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.027.
Zhao YC, Song LJ, Li GJ, et al. Chemical stabilization of MSW incinerator fly ashes. J Hazard Mater. 2002;2815:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00002-X.
Assi A, Bilo F, Zanoletti A, et al. Zero-waste approach in municipal solid waste incineration: Reuse of bottom ash to stabilize fly ash. J Clean Prod. 2020;245: 118779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118779.
Tong L, He J, Wang F, et al. Evaluation of the BCR sequential extraction scheme for trace metal fractionation of alkaline municipal solid waste incineration fly ash. Chemosphere. 2020;249: 126115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126115.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 22074057, 22205089 and 21775059), the Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (grant nos. 20YF3FA025 and 18YF1NA004).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Qi Wang, Huiyu Yan, Linyan Yao, Yingguo and Jianxi Xiao. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Qi Wang and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Q., Yan, H., Yao, L. et al. A robust acid-resistant chelating polymer for enhanced stabilization of lead ions in fly ash. BMC Chemistry 18, 103 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-024-01209-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-024-01209-z