Skip to main content

Efficient synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(-1H-1,2,3-triazolyl)methyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivative via multistep synthesis approach by novel Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst


In this pared, an efficient method is introduced for the synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives. These novel products have both 1,2,3-triazole and quinazolinone in their structures. For the synthesis of these products, a novel catalyst is designed, synthesized, and characterized by the immobilization of copper onto modified magnetic iron oxide. The catalyst (denoted: Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION) was characterized by several characterization techniques. In this regard, 16 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives were synthesized in high isolated yields (77–86%). As an advantage, the catalyst is highly recoverable and its activity has not decreased after 7 sequential runs. The method is very efficient for the synthesis of the products in high isolated yields under mild reaction conditions in a green solvent. The scope of the method is broad and several examples were successfully synthesized using starting materials with different functional groups.

Peer Review reports


Catalytic reactions are of high interest, due to their advantages in organic synthesis, including high isolated yields of the products, milder reaction conditions, and performing the reactions in green and environmentally friendly solvents. These advantages have led to several studies on developing catalysts to overcome their drawbacks, including difficulties in separation from the reaction mixture and its reusability. An interesting approach for this purpose is to immobilize the catalysts onto nanoparticles [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Among different nanoparticles, magnetic nanoparticles in general, and iron oxide nanoparticles in particular, are interesting nanoparticles to be used as support for the catalysts. Iron oxide nanoparticles are chemically and physically stable, magnetically separable, and easily synthesized and functionalized. Therefore, these nanomaterials are of high interest to be used as support for catalysts [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Copper is a transition metal that is used as a catalyst for several chemical transformations [19,20,21]. This metal has been used as a catalyst in several reactions, including oxidation [22,23,24], reduction [25, 26], carbon–carbon coupling [27,28,29], and alkyne-azide cycloaddition click reaction [30,31,32,33].

Copper(I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition click reaction is an interesting and efficient reaction for the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole derivatives from the reaction of an alkyne and an alkyl azide. This reaction is fast and efficient and the products are easily synthesized in high isolated yields using copper(I) as the catalyst [34,35,36]. 1,2,3-Triazolea are significant due to their valuable properties as antiplatelet [37], dye [38], antioxidant [39, 40], antimicrobial [41,42,43], and anticancer [44,45,46]. On the other hand, quinazolinone and its derivatives have shown vast biological properties, such as anticonvulsant [47], anticancer [48,49,50], and antibacterial [51,52,53] properties. In addition, quinazolinone derivatives have enhanced the lubrication properties of oil [54,55,56]. Therefore, several efforts have been focused on the synthesis of the quinazolinones, especially using green solvent and conditions [57,58,59,60,61,62,63]. Regarding the significance of quinazilinones and 1,2,3-triazoles in modern medicinal chemistry, in this paper, we report the synthesis of novel 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivative (Scheme 1).

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Chemical structure of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one containing quinazilinone and 1,2,3-triazole

The synthesis is performed in 4 steps with commercially available chemicals in efficient and facile methods. The synthesis of the products is presented in Scheme 4. Novel Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst is introduced and synthesized for alkyne-azide cycloaddition click reaction in this synthesis.

Results and discussion

In this study, we have introduced a highly efficient and eco-friendly method for the multistep synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives. These novel products possess unique structures that combine the 1,2,3-triazole and quinazolinone moieties, making them valuable compounds in the field of medicinal chemistry. The key feature of this study is the development of a novel catalyst, denoted as Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION, which is based on the immobilization of copper onto superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION). This catalyst was synthesized via a simple and straightforward process that involved the encapsulation of SPION by silica, followed by functionalization with 2-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole, which was used as a ligand for the copper catalyst. The entire synthesis process of the catalyst is presented in detail in Scheme 2. The newly developed catalyst showed remarkable performance in the synthesis of the target compounds, yielding high isolated yields (77–86%) under mild reaction conditions and in a green solvent. Importantly, the catalyst demonstrated excellent recyclability, with no loss of activity observed after 7 sequential runs. This characteristic is particularly significant, as it not only enhances the sustainability of the process but also makes it economically viable.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Synthesis of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

After the synthesis of the catalyst, Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION was fully characterized by several characterization techniques. The successful synthesis of the catalyst was studied by FT-IR spectroscopy. The FT-IR spectrum of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION is presented in Fig. 1a. Figure 1a represents silica coated SPION. The characteristic peaks at 1078 and 583 cm−1 belong to Si–O and Fe–O vibrations, respectively. Hydroxyl group vibration of the catalyst could be observed at 3328 cm−1. The magnetic properties of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst are presented in Fig. 1b. for better comparison, the VSM results of silica coated SPION and Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst are compared in Fig. 1b. It is clearly observed that the catalyst shows superparamagnetic behavior. A decrease in the magnetization of the catalyst could be correlated to the functionalization of the magnetic nanoparticles by different groups. However, the magnetization is intense enough for the magnetical separation of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst from the reaction mixture. For the determination of the copper content in the structure of the catalyst, ICP analysis was used. The results showed that each gram of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst contains 3.71 mmol of copper (Additional file 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

a FTIR; b VSM results of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst. In the FTIR spectra, the red line (denoted a) shows SiO2 encapsulated SPION the black line (denoted b) shows SiO2 encapsulated SPION and the blue line (denoted c) shows Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

The structures of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst were studied by SEM and TEM microscopy methods. The SEM and TEM images are presented in Fig. 2a, d. Based on the results, the nanoparticles are spherical with an average size of 22 nm with a very narrow polydispersity. The particles are uniform and no aggregation or agglomeration was observed, which could due to the functionalization of SPION by silica and 2-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazoleis, which prevents the aggregation of the nanoparticles. In addition, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis was carried out to confirm the presence of copper in the catalyst (Fig. 2e). The EDS spectrum obtained showed the characteristic peaks of copper at the appropriate energy level, indicating the successful incorporation of copper into the catalyst structure. The intensity of the copper peak was strong, suggesting a high percentage of copper in the catalyst. The EDS analysis provided clear evidence of the presence of copper in the catalyst and supported the characterization data obtained from other techniques. Overall, the EDS analysis confirmed the successful synthesis of the Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst and its potential for use in catalytic reactions.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a, c SEM; and b, d TEM images; and e EDS result of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst with different magnifications

After the characterization of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION, the catalyst was used for the synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones. As could be seen in Scheme 2, the challenging step of the reaction is the last one, which involves the click reaction for the formation of 1,2,3-triazole heterocycle. Therefore, this reaction was optimized by performing the reaction in different solvents, in the presence of various amounts of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION. In addition, the reaction is performed in the presence of non-immobilized CuI to compare the results of the synthesis of the desired products by Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION and nonimmobilized copper catalyst. The results are presented in Table 1. It could be observed that Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION has acted much more efficiently than CuI. In addition, the presence of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst is essential for the reaction performance, while performing the reaction without the catalyst has not led to the product.

Table 1 Optimization of the reaction conditions

Having the optimized reaction conditions, the scope and the generality of the method was evaluated by using different substrates. The results are presented in Table 2. It should be observed that all the substrates have given the corresponding products in high isolated yields.

Table 2 Scope and generality of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyzed synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(-1H-1,2,3-triazolyl)methyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivative

As an advantage, Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst is its reusability. For studying the reusability of the catalyst, Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION was separated from the reaction mixture and used in the next reaction without any further purification. The recovery of the catalyst was repeated for 7 sequential reactions. The results are presented in Fig. 3. It could be observed that the activity of the catalyst has remained constant after various reaction runs. In addition, for studying the leaching of the catalyst, a model reaction was performed and the reaction mixture was stirred for 12 h. After 12 h, the catalyst was separated by an external magnet and the solution was analyzed for the presence of copper. During the recyclability studies, the stability of the Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst was evaluated by analyzing the copper content in the reaction solution using Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) analysis. The results showed that there was no detectable copper in the solution, indicating the high stability and reusability of the catalyst. In addition, in another reaction, the catalyst was separated from the reaction mixture before the completion of the reaction. The performance of the reaction was studied after the removal of the catalyst by GC and the results showed no performance in the reaction that confirms the necessity of the presence of the catalyst for the reaction.

Fig. 3
figure 3

The recovery of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

For the best characterization of the stability of the catalyst, Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst was characterized by SEM. The SEM of the recovered catalyst is presented in Fig. 4. Based on the result, the catalyst did not show change in its structure after being used in the reaction.

Fig. 4
figure 4

SEM image of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

In comparison to previously reported catalysts for the synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole-containing compounds, the Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst showed excellent performance. For instance, the Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst had a shorter reaction time and a lower catalyst loading compared to previously reported catalysts. Furthermore, the catalyst exhibited high stability and reusability, retaining its activity after multiple runs. In addition, the methodology presented in this work is a green and efficient synthesis route using a benign solvent, which makes it more environmentally friendly compared to other reported methods.

A possible mechanism was proposed and suggested for the synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one products using Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst. The suggested mechanism is presented in Scheme 3. According to the suggested mechanism, the presence of the catalyst is critical for the synthesis of the product. The copper attached to the catalyst play an important role in the activation of the alkyne, which subsequently undergoes nucleophilic attack by the azide group. The resulting intermediate then undergoes cyclization with the help of the copper catalyst to form the desired triazole ring. The immobilization of the copper onto the SPION nanoparticles is believed to enhance the stability and reusability of the catalyst, making it an attractive and efficient option for this type of multistep synthesis.

Scheme 3
scheme 3

Possible mechanism for the synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one products using Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst


General remarks

Solvents, reagents, and chemicals were obtained from Merck (Germany) and Fluka (Switzerland) Chemical Companies. Melting points were taken on a Kofler hot stage apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were obtained on a Nicolet Magna FT-IR 550 spectrophotometer (potassium bromide disks). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were recorded on Bruker FT-500 spectrometers using tetramethyl silane (TMS) as the internal standard in pure deuterated solvents. Chemical shifts are given in the δ scale in parts per million (ppm) and singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), multiplet (m), and doublets of doublet (dd) are recorded. Mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent Technology (HP) mass spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of 70 eV. The elemental analysis was performed with an Elemetar Analysen system GmbH VarioEL CHNS mode. Purification of all products was conducted by column chromatography on silica gel using petroleum ether and ethyl acetate as eluent. Thin layer chromatography was carried out on silica gel 254 analytical sheets obtained from Fluka. Column chromatography was carried out on the column of silica gel 60 Merck (230–240 mesh) in glass columns (2 or 3 cm diameter) using 15–30 g of silica gel per one gram of the crude mixture. Transition electron microscope images were recorded on a HITACHI S-4160.

Synthesis of silica encapsulated SPION

For the preparation of SPION, two micro-emulsions were prepared. The first one contained a solution of FeCl3·6H2O (202 mg), FeCl2·4H2O (75 mg), and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (1.8 g) in 2.045 mL of deionized water as the aqueous phase, and toluene (29 mL) as the organic phase. The second micro-emulsion contained 1.8 g of CTAB in 29 mL toluene and 25% ammonium hydroxide solution (2.65 mL). The two micro-emulsions were mixed in a three-necked flask under vigorous stirring at 7000 rpm at 50 °C under a constant flow of N2 gas for 60 min. The dark precipitates were separated using an external magnet and washed with boiling EtOH from impurities. The obtained SPIONs were dried under vacuum for 12 h at room temperature.

For coating magnetic nanoparticles with silica, a solution of 200 µL of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) in 40 mL ethanol was added to a mixture containing 1 mg of SPION in 10 mL of deionized water under vigorous mechanical stirring followed by the addition of 1.25 mL of aqueous ammonia (25% w/w). After 1 h, the obtained magnetic nanoparticles suspension was magnetically separated and washed twice with deionized water. The SiO2@SPION product was separated and dried under reduced pressure at room temperature for 12 h.

Synthesis of 2-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazoleis ligand

Picolinic acid (10 mmol, 1.231 g) was weighed and added to methanol (15 mL). Then, sulfuric acid (100 µL) was added to the solution and stirred at room temperature for 12 h. the reaction mixture was neutralized by the addition of a 0.1 M solution of NaOH. The solvent was evaporated and the product was recrystallized from ethanol. In the next step, methyl picolinate product (5 mmol, 0.685 g) was dissolved in ethanol, and hydrazine (7 mmol, 0.2240 mg) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature overnight and the product was purified after the removal of the catalyst by recrystallization from ethyl acetate to form pure 2-((hydrazinyloxy)carbonyl)pyridine. In the next step, 2-((hydrazinyloxy)carbonyl)pyridine (4 mmol, 0.612 g) and KOH (5 mmol, 0.280 g) dissolved in ethanol (15 mL) and then CS2 (4 mmol, 0.304 g) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred under reflux conditions for 18 h. After the reaction was completed, 5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thiol ligand was purified by recrystallization from ethanol.

Synthesis of Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

Silica encapsulated SPION (500 mg) was added to dry ethanol (10 mL) and sonicated for 30 min. after that, 3-(chloropropyl)-trimethoxysilane (10 mmol, 1.987 g) was added and stirred at 70 °C for 12 h. after that, the product was separated from the reaction mixture by a magnet and washed 3 times by toluene, ethanol, and acetone, respectively. The product was added to dry toluene (10 mL) and sonicated for 30 min. Then, 5-(pyridin-2-yl)-1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-thiol ligand (3 mmol, 0.540 g) was added and stirred for 24 h at room temperature. Then, 75 mL of CuCl (0.04 M) was added to a mixture of the above product in dichloromethane and was allowed to stir at r. t. overnight. The product was separated, washed with water, and EtOH, and then dried at r. t. The Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION nanocatalyst was obtained as a dark powder. After that, Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst was separated and washed with toluene, ethanol, and acetone and dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h.

Synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivatives

In the first step, isatoic anhydride (10 mmol, 1.630 g) was added to water, and amine (12.5 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and the reaction performance was monitored by TLC (hexane/ethyl acetate, 5:95). After the completion of the reaction, the product was filtered and washed with cold water, and dried in air. To the product (5 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL), was added CS2 (5 mmol, 0.380 g) and stirred under reflux conditions. After the reaction was completed, it was poured onto ice water and the product was filtered and purified by recrystallization from ethyl acetate. To this 3-alkyl-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one product (5 mmol) in DMF (20 mL), was added K2CO3 (8 mmol, 1.104 g) and propargyl bromide (5 mmol, 0,585 g) and stirred at 75 °C for 12 h. After the reaction was completed, the 3-alkyl-2-(prop-2-yn-1-ylthio)quinazolin-4(3H)-one product was separated by the addition of the reaction mixture to the ice water mixture, followed by washing in cold water 3 times.

For the synthesis of the products, 3-alkyl-2-(prop-2-yn-1-ylthio)quinazolin-4(3H)-one (3 mmol) was added to ethanol (10 mL), and 2-chloro-N-alkylacetamide (3 mmol), sodium azide (3 mmol), and Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst (50 mg) as added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature and after the reaction was completed, the catalyst was isolated from the reaction mixture by a magnet. The solvent was removed and the product was purified by recrystallization from ethanol. The synthesis steps are presented in Scheme 4.

Scheme 4
scheme 4

Synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(((4-(2-oxopropyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)alkyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one products using Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst

Spectral data of the products


M.p. = 195–197 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3168, 3126, 3084, 1665, 1601, 1241 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.72 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 3H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 4.59 (s, 3H), 2.09 (s, 6H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.42, 161.07, 156.70, 146.67, 135.46, 134.99, 134.26, 128.17, 127.58, 127.21, 127.18, 126.56, 126.38, 126.23, 123.25, 119.92, 52.82, 46.07, 27.62, 19.56, 18.43. Anal. calcd. For C24H26N6O2S: C, 62.32; H, 5.67; N, 18.17; S, 6.93. Found: C, 62.65; H, 5.39; N, 18.03; S, 7.14; MS (70 eV): m/z = 462 (M+).


M.p. = 214–215 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3170, 3128, 3086, 1667, 1601, 1240 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.72 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 3H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 4.59 (s, 3H), 2.09 (s, 6H), 1.53 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.98, 161.41, 156.12, 146.67, 140.22, 134.92, 133.62, 131.06, 127.16, 126.60, 126.53, 126.35, 126.28, 123.93, 120.40, 119.13, 118.03, 52.78, 45.81, 27.46, 19.56. Anal. calcd. For C22H21ClN6O2S: C, 65.35; H, 4.51; N, 17.92; S, 6.84. Found: C, 65.17; H, 4.72; N, 18.08; S, 6.99; MS (70 eV): m/z = 468 (M+).


M.p. = 231–233 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3175, 3136, 3084, 1666, 1602, 1243 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.61 (s, 1H), 8.22 (s, 1H), 8.05 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.46 (m, 4H), 7.43 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.33 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s, 3H), 1.56 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.82, 161.44, 156.20, 146.70, 138.22, 134.93, 132.18, 126.56, 126.53, 126.37, 126.34, 126.28, 121.56, 120.42, 115.86, 52.75, 46.09, 27.50, 19.59. Anal. calcd. For C22H21BrN6O2S: C, 51.47; H, 4.12; N, 16.37; S, 6.24. Found: C, 51.74; H, 3.97; N, 16.19; S, 6.07; MS (70 eV): m/z = 512 (M+).


M.p. = 208–210 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3172, 3130, 3088, 1669, 1603, 1242 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.75 (t, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.04 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (td, J = 7.7, 7.1, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (q, J = 8.1 Hz, 3H), 5.12 (s, 2H), 4.58 (s, 3H), 4.24 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 2.25 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.73, 161.42, 156.24, 146.69, 136.51, 136.07, 134.96, 129.30, 127.81, 126.56, 126.34, 126.24, 126.07, 126.04, 120.42, 52.09, 47.67, 42.55, 27.47, 21.10, 19.56. Anal. calcd. For C24H26N6O2S: C, 62.32; H, 5.67; N, 18.17; S, 6.93. Found: C, 62.16; H, 5.89; N, 18.35; S, 7.16; MS (70 eV): m/z = 462 (M+).


M.p. = 198–201 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3168, 3134, 3088, 1669, 1602, 1238 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.08 (s, 1H), 8.24 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 8.21 (s, 1H), 8.05 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.83–7.75 (m, 3H), 7.63 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.48–7.40 (m, 1H), 5.40 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s, 3H), 1.56 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.81, 161.45, 156.23, 146.70, 144.95, 143.00, 135.01, 131.63, 128.25, 126.57, 126.55, 126.40, 126.31, 125.60, 119.44, 52.78, 48.62, 27.44, 19.59. Anal. calcd. For C22H21N7O4S: C, 55.11; H, 4.41; N, 20.45; S, 6.69. Found: C, 54.95; H, 4.24; N, 20.29; S, 6.88; MS (70 eV): m/z = 479 (M+).


M.p. = 212–215 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3174, 3132, 3089, 1671, 1605, 1243 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.43 (s, 1H), 8.19 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (dd, J = 11.6, 5.4 Hz, 2H), 5.29 (s, 2H), 4.60 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.57, 161.43, 156.22, 146.69, 138.82, 135.47, 134.96, 129.34, 128.17, 127.18, 126.55, 126.36, 126.27, 124.19, 119.61, 52.70, 48.79, 27.49, 19.58. Anal. calcd. For C22H22N6O2S: C, 60.81; H, 5.10; N, 19.34; S, 7.38. Found: C, 60.98; H, 5.22; N, 19.56; S, 7.47; MS (70 eV): m/z = 434 (M+).


M.p. = 206–208 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3171, 3128, 3086, 1666, 1601, 1243 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.72 (s, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.2 Hz,  H), 7.59–7.36 (m, 7H), 7.05 (s, 3H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H), 2.11 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.42, 161.16, 157.12, 147.67, 136.16, 135.49, 135.37, 134.60, 132.17, 130.39, 129.95, 129.85, 128.18, 127.19, 127.02, 126.67, 126.51, 126.02, 120.05, 52.12, 27.28, 18.45. Anal. calcd. For C27H24N6O2S: C, 65.30; H, 4.87; N, 16.92; S, 4.46. Found: C, 65.12; H, 4.69; N, 17.11; S, 4.25; MS (70 eV): m/z = 496 (M+).


M.p. = 221–223 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3175, 3134, 3091, 1672, 1606, 1245 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.67 (s, 1H), 8.18 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.79–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.39 (m, 9H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 4.50 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.09, 161.19, 157.12, 147.69, 140.26, 136.19, 135.38, 134.61, 133.65, 131.11, 130.43, 129.99, 129.88, 129.74, 127.02, 126.74, 126.53, 123.97, 120.07, 119.15, 118.06, 52.67, 27.31. Anal. calcd. For C25H19ClN6O2S: C, 59.70; H, 3.81; N, 16.71; S, 6.37. Found: C, 59.92; H, 4.01; N, 16.53; S, 6.20; MS (70 eV): m/z = 502 (M+).


M.p. = 185–187 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3173, 3131, 3087, 1669, 1602, 1244 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.57 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.40 (m, 10H), 5.27 (s, 2H), 4.47 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.82, 161.16, 157.11, 147.67, 138.19, 136.16, 135.37, 132.18, 130.40, 129.96, 129.86, 127.01, 126.71, 126.51, 126.10, 125.56, 121.56, 120.05, 115.83, 52.64, 27.27. Anal. calcd. For C25H19BrN6O2S: C, 54.85; H, 3.50; N, 15.35; S, 5.86. Found: C, 55.02; H, 3.74; N, 15.59; S, 6.01; MS (70 eV): m/z = 546 (M+).


M.p. = 231–233 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3172, 3132, 3089, 1670, 1603, 1244 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.04 (s, 1H), 8.28–8.11 (m, 3H), 8.07 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.88–7.66 (m, 5H), 7.60–7.38 (m, 6H), 5.36 (s, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.73, 161.15, 157.08, 147.66, 144.91, 142.99, 136.16, 135.36, 131.97, 130.40, 129.96, 129.85, 128.73, 127.00, 126.71, 126.50, 125.53, 120.03, 119.43, 52.78, 27.32; Anal. calcd. For C25H19N7O4S: C, 58.47; H, 3.73; N, 19.09; S, 6.24. Found: C, 58.27; H, 3.66; N, 18.88; S, 6.06; MS (70 eV): m/z = 513 (M+).


M.p. = 224–225 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3167, 3127, 3086, 1665, 1602, 1241 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.44 (s, 1H), 8.15 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.49 (m, 5H), 7.50–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.30 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.27 (s, 2H), 4.48 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.57, 161.17, 157.10, 147.67, 138.82, 136.16, 135.37, 130.40, 129.96, 129.86, 129.35, 127.00, 126.71, 126.50, 124.20, 120.04, 119.60, 52.67, 27.29; Anal. calcd. For C25H20N6O2S: C, 64.09; H, 4.30; N, 17.94; S, 6.84. Found: C, 63.90; H, 4.51; N, 17.81; S, 7.03; MS (70 eV): m/z = 468 (M+).


M.p. = 219–221 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3172, 3128, 3086, 1667, 1602, 1241 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 9.72 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.18 (m, 6H), 7.04 (q, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 5.29 (s, 2H), 4.59 (s, 2H), 2.09 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.39, 161.37, 156.70, 147.26, 136.00, 135.47, 135.39, 134.59, 130.28, 129.04, 128.17, 127.85, 127.18, 127.13, 127.06, 126.63, 126.11, 119.43, 119.20, 52.13, 47.22, 27.06, 18.43. Anal. calcd. For C28H26N6O2S: C, 65.86; H, 5.13; N, 16.46; S, 6.28. Found: C, 65.63; H, 5.00; N, 16.31; S, 6.12; MS (70 eV): m/z = 510 (M+).


M.p. = 197–199 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3174, 3132, 3091, 1670, 1604, 1243 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.56 (s, 1H), 8.14–8.09 (m, 2H), 7.83 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.45 (m, 5H), 7.30 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (dd, J = 14.0, 7.4 Hz, 3H), 5.30 (s, 2 ), 5.27 (s, 2H), 4.59 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.82, 161.38, 156.69, 147.27, 136.01, 135.40, 134.81, 133.70, 132.18, 130.15, 129.05, 127.86, 127.13, 127.05, 126.69, 126.66, 126.11, 121.55, 119.20, 52.64, 47.23, 27.00. Anal. calcd. For C26H21BrN6O2S: C, 55.62; H, 3.77; N, 14.97; S, 5.71. Found: C, 55.85; H, 3.47; N, 15.18; S, 5.56; MS (70 eV): m/z = 560 (M+).


M.p. = 212–214 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3172, 3130, 3088, 1669, 1603, 1242 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 11.08 (s, 1H), 8.23 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.17 (s, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J = 11.4, 8.2 Hz, 3H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dt, J = 35.0, 7.5 Hz, 5H), 5.39 (s, 2H), 5.31 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.77, 161.38, 156.67, 147.27, 144.94, 143.00, 136.02, 135.37, 131.23, 129.06, 128.82, 127.87, 127.16, 127.05, 126.68, 126.63, 125.54, 119.43, 119.20, 52.78, 47.25, 27.06. Anal. calcd. For C26H21N7O4S: C, 59.19; H, 4.01; N, 18.59; S, 6.08. Found: C, 59.33; H, 3.89; N, 18.77; S, 5.91; MS (70 eV): m/z = 527 (M+).


M.p. = 224–225 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3168, 3126, 3087, 1666, 1600, 1241 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.45 (s, 1H), 8.16 (s, 1H), 8.11 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.67 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.26 (dd, J = 31.9, 8.1 Hz, 8H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.30 (s, 4H), 4.61 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 164.57, 161.37, 156.66, 147.26, 138.84, 136.01, 135.33, 129.33, 129.03, 128.81, 127.85, 127.17, 127.04, 126.66, 126.59, 126.23, 124.19, 119.63, 119.21, 52.71, 47.24, 27.10. Anal. calcd. For C26H22N6O2S: C, 64.71; H, 4.60; N, 17.42; S, 6.64. Found: C, 46.56; H, 4.82; N, 17.26; S, 6.86; MS (70 eV): m/z = 482 (M+).


M.p. = 238–239 °C; IR (KBr): υ = 3171, 3131, 3088, 1668, 1603, 1242 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.66 (s, 1H), 8.20 (s, 1H), 8.12 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (s, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.42 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dt, J = 18.5, 7.6 Hz, 4H), 7.24 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 5.32 (d, J = 13.3 Hz, 4H), 4.62 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 165.01, 161.38, 156.60, 147.26, 140.24, 136.01, 135.34, 133.65, 131.07, 129.05, 127.86, 127.18, 127.05, 126.69, 126.63, 123.95, 119.22, 119.15, 118.04, 52.76, 47.25, 27.06. Anal. calcd. For C26H21ClN6O2S: C, 60.40; H, 4.09; N, 16.26; S, 6.20. Found: C, 60.23; H, 3.85; N, 16.05; S, 5.96; MS (70 eV): m/z = 516 (M+).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Kamel S, Khattab TA. Recent advances in cellulose supported metal nanoparticles as green and sustainable catalysis for organic synthesis. Cellulose. 2021;28(8):4545–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bordet A, Leitner W. Metal nanoparticles immobilized on molecularly modified surfaces: versatile catalytic systems for controlled hydrogenation and hydrogenolysis. Acc Chem Res. 2021;54(9):2144–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shafiei N, Nasrollahzadeh M, Iravani S. Green synthesis of silica and silicon nanoparticles and their biomedical and catalytic applications. Comments Inorg Chem. 2021;41(6):317–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayahi MH, Toosibashi M, Bahmaei M, Lijan H, Ma’Mani L, Mahdavi M, Bahadorikhalili S. Pd@ Py2PZ@ MSN as a novel and efficient catalyst for CC bond formation reactions. Front Chem. 2022;10:838294.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghorbani-Choghamarani A, Mohammadi M, Tamoradi T, Ghadermazi M. Covalent immobilization of Co complex on the surface of SBA-15: green, novel and efficient catalyst for the oxidation of sulfides and synthesis of polyhydroquinoline derivatives in green condition. Polyhedron. 2019;158:25–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Esmaili S, Khazaei A, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A, Mohammadi M. Silica sulfuric acid coated on SnFe2O4 MNPs: synthesis, characterization and catalytic applications in the synthesis of polyhydroquinolines. RSC Adv. 2022;12(23):14397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mohammadi M, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A. Hercynite silica sulfuric acid: a novel inorganic sulfurous solid acid catalyst for one-pot cascade organic transformations. RSC Adv. 2022;12(40):26023–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohammadi M, Khodamorady M, Tahmasbi B, Bahrami K, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A. Boehmite nanoparticles as versatile support for organic–inorganic hybrid materials: synthesis, functionalization, and applications in eco-friendly catalysis. J Ind Eng Chem. 2021;97:1–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazemi M, Mohammadi M. Magnetically recoverable catalysts: catalysis in synthesis of polyhydroquinolines. Appl Organomet Chem. 2020;34(3): e5400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mokhtary M. Recent advances in catalysts immobilized on magnetic nanoparticles. J Iran Chem Soc. 2016;13(10):1827–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Arya I, Poona A, Dikshit PK, Pandit S, Kumar J, Singh HN, Jha NK, Rudayni HA, Chaudhary AA, Kumar S. Current trends and future prospects of nanotechnology in biofuel production. Catalysts. 2021;11(11): 1308.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sayahi MH, Ghomi M, Hamad SM, Ganjali MR, Aghazadeh M, Mahdavi M, Bahadorikhalili S. Electrochemical synthesis of three-dimensional flower‐like Ni/Co–BTC bimetallic organic framework as heterogeneous catalyst for solvent‐free and green synthesis of substituted chromeno[4,3-b]quinolones. J Chin Chem Soc. 2021;68(4):620–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fatahi Y, Ghaempanah A, Ma’mani L, Mahdavi M, Bahadorikhalili S. Palladium supported aminobenzamide modified silica coated superparamagnetic iron oxide as an applicable nanocatalyst for heck cross-coupling reaction. J Organomet Chem. 2021;936:121711.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mohammadi M, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A. A novel hercynite-supported tetradentate Schiff base complex of manganese catalyzed one-pot annulation reactions. Appl Organomet Chem. 2022;36(12): e6905.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mohammadi M, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A. Synthesis and characterization of novel hercynite@sulfuric acid and its catalytic applications in the synthesis of polyhydroquinolines and 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones. RSC Adv. 2022;12(5):2770–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghobakhloo F, Azarifar D, Mohammadi M, Keypour H, Zeynali H. Copper(II) Schiff-base complex modified UiO-66-NH2(Zr) metal–organic framework catalysts for Knoevenagel condensation–Michael addition–cyclization reactions. Inorg Chem. 2022;61(12):4825–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Riadi Y, Kadhim M, Jawad Shoja M, Hussein Ali S, Fakri Mustafa M, Sajjadi Y. Copper (II) complex supported on the surface of magnetic nanoparticles modified with S-benzylisothiourea (Fe3O4@SiO2-SMTU-Cu): a new and efficient nanomagnetic catalyst for the synthesis of quinazolines and amides. Synth Commun. 2022;52(6):875–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdolmohammadi S, Shariati S, Fard NE, Samani A. Aqueous-mediated green synthesis of novel spiro[indole‐quinazoline]derivatives using kit‐6 mesoporous silica coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles as catalyst. J Heterocycl Chem. 2020;57(7):2729–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marais L, Vosloo HC, Swarts AJ. Homogeneous oxidative transformations mediated by copper catalyst systems. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;440: 213958.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng L-J, Mankad NP. Copper-catalyzed carbonylative coupling of alkyl halides. Acc Chem Res. 2021;54(9):2261–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sadegh Asgari M, Bahadorikhalili S, Rahimi R, Mahdavi M. Copper supported onto magnetic nanoparticles as an efficient catalyst for the synthesis of triazolobenzodiazepino [7,1-b]quinazolin‐11(9H)‐ones via click N‐arylation reactions. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6(6):1385–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ding Y, Fu L, Peng X, Lei M, Wang C, Jiang J. Copper catalysts for radical and nonradical persulfate based advanced oxidation processes: certainties and uncertainties. Chem Eng J. 2022;427: 131776.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang L, Jiang J, Ma J, Pang S, Zhang T. A review on advanced oxidation processes homogeneously initiated by copper (II). Chem Eng J. 2022;427: 131721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Martos M, Pastor IM. Iron-based imidazolium salt as dual Lewis acid and redox catalyst for the aerobic synthesis of quinazolines. Eur J Org Chem. 2022;2022(36): e202200839.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bui JC, Kim C, Weber AZ, Bell AT. Dynamic boundary layer simulation of pulsed CO2 electrolysis on a copper catalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 2021;6(4):1181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alossaimi MA, Riadi Y, Geesi MH, Aldhafiri MK, Alanazi AI, Dehbi O, Ibnouf EO, Azzallou R. Characterization, biological evaluation and molecular docking of a synthesised quinazolinone-based derivative. J Mol Struct. 2022;1266: 133519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Ozden A, Wan M, Hu Y, Li F, Wang Y, Zamani RR, Ren D, Wang Z, Xu Y. Silica-copper catalyst interfaces enable carbon-carbon coupling towards ethylene electrosynthesis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Salih KS. Modern development in copper-and nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions: formation of carbon-carbon and carbon-heteroatom bonds under microwave irradiation conditions. Asian J Org Chem. 2022;11(4): e202200023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Tamoradi T, Masoumeh Mousavi S, Mohammadi M. C–C and C–S coupling catalyzed by supported Cu(II) on nano CoFe2O4. ChemistrySelect. 2020;5(17):5077–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rezaei-Ghaleh N, Agudo-Canalejo J, Griesinger C, Golestanian R. Molecular diffusivity of click reaction components: the diffusion enhancement question. J Am Chem Soc. 2022;144(3):1380–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bahadorikhalili S, Ma’mani L, Mahdavi H, Shafiee A. Copper supported β-cyclodextrin functionalized PEGylated mesoporous silica nanoparticle-graphene oxide hybrid: an efficient and recyclable nano-catalyst for straightforward synthesis of 2-arylbenzimidazoles and 1,2,3-triazoles. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018;262:207–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bahadorikhalili S, Ashtari A, Ma’Mani L, Ranjbar PR, Mahdavi M. Copper-supported β-cyclodextrin-functionalized magnetic nanoparticles: efficient multifunctional catalyst for one-pot ‘green’ synthesis of 1,2,3-triazolylquinazolinone derivatives. Appl Organomet Chem. 2018;32(4): e4212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Asgari MS, Bahadorikhalili S, Ghaempanah A, Ranjbar PR, Rahimi R, Abbasi A, Larijani B, Mahdavi M. Copper-catalyzed one-pot synthesis of amide linked 1,2,3-triazoles bearing aryloxy skeletons. Tetrahedron Lett. 2021;65: 152765.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liang L, Astruc D. The copper (I)-catalyzed alkyne-azide cycloaddition (CuAAC)click reaction and its applications. An overview. Coord Chem Rev. 2011;255(23–24):2933–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohammadi M, Ghorbani-Choghamarani A. Complexation of guanidino containing l-arginine with nickel on silica-modified hercynite MNPs: a novel catalyst for the Hantzsch synthesis of polyhydroquinolines and 2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-ones. Res Chem Intermed. 2022;48(6):2641–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sadeghi Meresht A, Ezzatzadeh E, Dehbandi B, Salimifard M, Rostamian R. Fe3O4/CuO nanocomposite promoted green synthesis of functionalized quinazolines using water extract of lettuce leaves as green media: study of antioxidant activity. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2022;42(7):4793–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Cunha AC, Figueiredo JM, Tributino JL, Miranda AL, Castro HC, Zingali RB, Fraga CA, de Souza MC, Ferreira VF, Barreiro EJ. Antiplatelet properties of novel N-substituted-phenyl-1,2,3-triazole-4-acylhydrazone derivatives. Bioorganic Med Chem. 2003;11(9):2051–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. El Azab IH, Gobouri AA, Altalhi TA, El-Sheshtawy H, Almutlaq N, Maddah HA, Zoromba MS, Abdel-Aziz M, Bassyouni M, Ibrahim A. Synthesis, characterization, DFT-TDDFT calculations and optical properties of a novel pyrazole-1,2,3-triazole hybrid thin film. Optik. 2021;247: 167971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wei L, Sui H, Zhang J, Guo Z. Synthesis and antioxidant activity of the inulin derivative bearing 1,2,3-triazole and diphenyl phosphate. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;186:47–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tan W, Li Q, Li W, Dong F, Guo Z. Synthesis and antioxidant property of novel 1,2,3-triazole-linked starch derivatives via ‘click chemistry.’ Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;82:404–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kumar SV, Scottwell SØ, Waugh E, McAdam CJ, Hanton LR, Brooks HJ, Crowley JD. Antimicrobial properties of tris (homoleptic) ruthenium(II) 2-pyridyl-1,2,3-triazole click complexes against pathogenic bacteria, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Inorg Chem. 2016;55(19):9767–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang B. Comprehensive review on the anti-bacterial activity of 1,2,3-triazole hybrids. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;168:357–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. El Malah T, Nour HF, Satti AA, Hemdan BA, El-Sayed WA. Design, synthesis, and antimicrobial activities of 1,2,3-triazole glycoside clickamers. Molecules. 2020;25(4): 790.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Alam MM. 1,2,3-Triazole hybrids as anticancer agents: a review. Arch Pharm. 2022;355(1): 2100158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Duan Y-C, Ma Y-C, Zhang E, Shi X-J, Wang M-M, Ye X-W, Liu H-M. Design and synthesis of novel 1,2,3-triazole-dithiocarbamate hybrids as potential anticancer agents. Eur J Med Chem. 2013;62:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pokhodylo N, Shyyka O, Matiychuk V. Synthesis and anticancer activity evaluation of new 1,2,3-triazole-4-carboxamide derivatives. Med Chem Res. 2014;23(5):2426–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. El-Feky S. Synthesis and anticonvulsant properties of some novel quinazolinone thiazolidine and 4-thiazolidone derivatives. Pharmazie. 1993;48(12):894–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ubale P, Mokale S, More S, Waghamare S, More V, Munirathinam N, Dilipkumar S, Das RK, Reja S, Helavi VB. Evaluation of in vitro anticancer, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of new Cu(II) complexes derived from 4(3H)-quinazolinone: synthesis, crystal structure and molecular docking studies. J Mol Struct. 2022;1251: 131984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Mohammad Hosein MH, Saghanezhad SJ, Bahadorikhalili S, Mahdavi M. CuBr-catalysed one‐pot multicomponent synthesis of 3‐substituted 2‐thioxo‐2, 3‐dihydroquinazolin‐4 (1H)‐one derivatives. Appl Organomet Chem. 2019;33: e4635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Syed T, Asiri YI, Shaheen S, Gangarapu K. Design, synthesis and anticancer evaluation of structurally modified substituted aryl-quinazoline derivatives as anticancer agents. Synth Commun. 2021;51(18):2782–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Heydari Z, Bahadorikhalili S, Rashidi Ranjbar P, Mahdavi M. DABCO-modified super‐paramagnetic nanoparticles as an efficient and water‐compatible catalyst for the synthesis of pyrano[3,2-c:5,6‐c′]dichromene‐6,8‐dione derivatives under mild reaction conditions. Appl Organomet Chem. 2018;32:e4561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Markosyan A, Ayvazyan A, Gabrielyan S, Mamyan S, Arsenyan F, Safaryan A, Arakelyan H. Synthesis and antitumor and antibacterial properties of 3-benzyl-spiro[benzo [h005DQuinazoline-5,1′-cycloheptane]-4(6H)-one derivatives. Pharm Chem J. 2021;55(2):133–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Riadi Y, Geesi MH, Dehbi O, Ouerghi O. Photocatalytic synthesis of quinazolinone derivatives as mediated by titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles greenly synthesised via citrus limon juice. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2022;43:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Elkholy AE, Rizk SA, Rashad AM. Enhancing lubricating oil properties using novel quinazolinone derivatives: DFT study and molecular dynamics simulation. J Mol Struct. 2019;1175:788–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Keyhani A, Nikpassand M, Fekri LZ, Kefayati H. Green synthesis of novel azo-linked 2-aryl-quinazolinones using of NiFe2O4@SP@GA nanoparticle. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2022;42(5):2607–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Foroughi Kaldareh M, Mokhtary M, Nikpassand M. Deep eutectic solvent mediated one-pot synthesis of hydrazinyl-4-phenyl-1, 3-thiazoles. Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2021;41(5):1012–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Patil VS, Padalkar VS, Chaudhari AS, Sekar N. Intrinsic catalytic activity of an acidic ionic liquid as a solvent for quinazoline synthesis. Catal Sci Technol. 2012;2(8):1681–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar KS, Kumar PM, Kumar KA, Sreenivasulu M, Jafar AA, Rambabu D, Krishna GR, Reddy CM, Kapavarapu R, Shivakumar K. A new three-component reaction: green synthesis of novel isoindolo [2, 1-a] quinazoline derivatives as potent inhibitors of TNF-α. Chem Commun. 2011;47(17):5010–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Wang S-L, Yang K, Yao C-S, Wang X-S. Green synthesis of quinazolinone derivatives catalyzed by iodine in ionic liquid. Synth Commun. 2012;42(3):341–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Torabi M, Fekri LZ, Nikpassand M. Synthesis, characterization and application of Fe3O4@silicapropyl@vaniline-covalented isoniazid-copper(I) nanocomposite as a new, mild, effective and magnetically recoverable Lewis acid catalyst for the synthesis of acridines and novel azoacridines. J Mol Struct. 2022;1250: 131761.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Nikpassand M, Fekri LZ, Sharafi S. An efficient and green synthesis of novel azo Schiff base and its complex under ultrasound irradiation. Orient J Chem. 2013;29(3):1041–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Nikpassand M, Keyhani A, Fekri LZ, Varma RS. Mechanochemical synthesis of azo-linked 2-amino-4H-chromene derivatives using Fe3O4@SiO2@KIT-6-NH2@Schiff-base complex nanoparticles. J Mol Struct. 2022;1251: 132065.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Nikpassand M, Fekri LZ, Pourahmad A. One-pot synthesis of new azo-linked 4H-benzo [d][1, 3] oxazine-2, 4-diones from carbon dioxide using CuO@ RHA/MCM-41 nanocomposite in green media. J Co2 Util. 2018;27:320–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not related to this work.


The authors have not used any funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



AS did the work and characterized the products. AS, SM, and MM analyzed the results. AS and MM prepared tha manuscript. MM leaded the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mahdavi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not related to this work.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Images of 1H NMR and 13C NMR of the new synthesized compounds are available in the Supporting Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherafati, A., Moradi, S. & Mahdavi, M. Efficient synthesis of 3-alkyl-2-(-1H-1,2,3-triazolyl)methyl)thio)-2,3-dihydroquinazolin-4(1H)-one derivative via multistep synthesis approach by novel Cu@Py-Oxa@SPION catalyst. BMC Chemistry 17, 154 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: