Skip to main content

The high photocatalytic efficiency and stability of LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites for photocatalytic water splitting to hydrogen


A binary direct Z-scheme LaNiO3/g-C3N4 nanocomposite photocatalyst consisted with LaNiO3 nanoparticles and g-C3N4 nanosheets was successfully synthesized by means of mechanical mixing and solvothermal methods in order to improve the photocatalytic water splitting activity. The as-prepared materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron microscope (SEM), Transmission Electron microscope (TEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) and N2 adsorption–desorption experiments, respectively, demonstrating the formation of interfacial interaction and heterogeneous structure in LaNiO3/g-C3N4 nanocomposites. Under UV-light irradiation, the LaNiO3/g-C3N4 samples which without the addition of any noble metal as co-catalyst behaved enhanced photocatalytic water splitting activity compared with pure LaNiO3 and g-C3N4, owing to the Z-scheme charge carrier transfer pathway. Especially, the LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4 nanocomposite reach an optimal yield of up to 3392.50 µmol g−1 in 5 h and held a maximum H2 evolution rate of 678.5 µmol h−1 g−1 that was 5 times higher than that of pure LaNiO3.


With the rapid development of modern society, there has been appeared the exhaustion of fossil fuels and environmental deterioration crisis. One form of environmentally friendly, economical and low cost renewable alternative energy was urgently needed under recent situation. Because of the high energy value and the benefit of green cleaning, hydrogen (H2) is a kind of the promising alternative new energy source that can become the substitute of the traditional carbon-based fossil fuels [1,2,3,4]. The light-driven photocatalytic water splitting to produce hydrogen has become the most promising method for scientific research to obtain sustainable energy [5, 6]. Researchers from all the world had found a mount of semiconductor photocatalyst showing good photocatalytic activities for water splitting to produce hydrogen (H2) [7,8,9]. Perovskite-type semiconductor materials present excellent photocatalytic properties due to sufficient oxygen vacancies and variable metal valence. However, there still exist some apparent disadvantages about these catalytic material such as poor light stability, high electron–hole recombination rate and small surface area that contribute to the reduction of catalytic activity and stability [10,11,12,13,14]. Several approaches have been proposed to overcome these problems, such as doping metal (Cu, Al) [15,16,17,18] or metal compound (CdS, NiS, TiO2, BiVO4) [19,20,21,22,23] even non-metal (B, C, N) [24, 25], loading noble metal (Au, Pd, Pt) [26] for surface modification. All above measures could effectively promote the separation rate of photo-generated electrons and holes, thus improve the catalytic activities. However, metals, especially precious metals, do not meet the current low cost requirement, and the catalytic effect is still limited.

In addition, several perovskite-type heterojuction nanocomposites have already been proposed and prepared for photocatalytic reaction in the literature [27,28,29]. The perovskite-type materials could be combined with other metal-free semiconductor materials that have matching band gaps to form Z-scheme heterostructure photocatalytic composite materials, which can transfer the photogenerated holes or electros from one semiconductor to another, thereby they not only reduce the recombination of carriers but also acquire more wide range of light response areas [30,31,32]. Acharya et al. loaded LaFeO3 nanoparticles on RGO nanosphere, which promoted the H2 evolution rate more than two fold than neat LFO [33]. Similarly, Tao Lv et al. reported that graphene-encapusulated LaNiO3 nanoreactor perform high photocatalytic activity for water splitting that was 12 times higher than that of pure LaNiO3 [34]. Even though the joint of ABO3 type perovskite and RGO was good for the photocatalytic reaction, complicated preparation and expensive cost limited its widely application. Compared with RGO, polymeric graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as one of the best π-conjugated carbonaceous materials, also having larger surface area, high thermochemical stability, excellent electronic properties and suitable forbidden band width (2.7 eV) [35,36,37,38,39]. More importantly, simple preparation process and cheap raw materials made g-C3N4 become a promising and popular material for photocatalytic reactions, as we can found, Fe2O3/g-C3N4, MoS2/g-C3N4, CsPbBr3/g-C3N4, BaTiO3/g-C3N4 [40,41,42,43] and so on materials had already been reported in the past few years. Ke Xu et al. combined g-C3N4 with LaFeO3 to prepare a heterogeneous composite material [44], which slightly improved the catalytic activity for water splitting compared to pure LaFeO3. Xiaosong Zhou et al. successfully synthesis LaNiO3/g-C3N4 for enhancing visible light photocatalytic activity towards tetracycline degradation [45], and the TC degradation rate was about 3.8 and 3.9 times larger than those of pure g-C3N4 and pristine LaNiO3, respectively. LaNiO3 synthesized via a sol–gel had been investigated for photocatalytic H2 evolution and the degradation of organic matter [46, 47], but the effect still needed to improve. As far as we know, it had not yet reported that LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 based Z-type heterogeneous structure catalysts can effectively utilize solar energy to catalytic decomposition of water, so it is necessary to do further research for the establishment of the catalyst system.

In this paper, Z-scheme-based photocatalytic system LaNiO3/x %g-C3N4 were constructed by mechanical mixing and solvothermal methods. During the preparation process, LaNiO3 nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method were evenly loaded on g-C3N4 layered nanosheets to obtain different products with a series of doping ratios. Finally, water splitting experiments showed that catalyst loaded 70wt % g-C3N4 present the best photocatalytic activity and perform good photo stability for H2 evolution after five photocatalytic cycles in 20 h.



Lanthanum(III) nitrate hexahydrate (purity > 99.99%), nicke(II)nitrate hexahydrate (purity > 99.99%), citric acid (purity > 99%), urea (purity > 99%), and ammonia solution(25% ~ 28%) bought from Beijing Hawk Science & Technology Co., Ltd. All other reagents used in this study were analytically pure and used without further purification.

Synthesis of LaNiO3 (LNO)

LaNiO3 nanoparticles were synthesized by a sol–gel method. The calculated amount of La(NO3)3·6H2O, Ni(NO3)2·9H2O, and citric acid in the molar ratio of 1:1:2 was suspended in 10 ml deionized water under magnetic stirring. Then the pH value of the mixed solution was adjusted to about 1 by the addition of ammonia solution. The mixture was continuously and uniformly stirred at the temperature of 70 °C until it formed green nitrate–citrate sol. Then the gel was evaporated at 120 °C in a blast drying oven to generate bulk dry gel. Finally, the dry gel was calcined in a muffle furnace at 400 °C for 2 h and then raised the temperature to 700 °C for 4 h to obtain LaNiO3 powder.

Synthesis of g-C3N4 (CN)

Graphitic carbon nitride was prepared from urea using a thermal condensation method. First, a certain amount of urea was dried at 80 °C in a blast drying oven for 24 h and grinded into fine powder. Then urea was placed in an alumina crucible with a cover and then subjected to calcination at 550 °C for 3 h in a temperature programmed muffle furnace. The ramping rate was set to 5 °C/min. Finally, the product was naturally cooled to room temperature and grinded with a mortar. And g-C3N4 yellow powder was obtained.

Synthesis of the LaNiO3/g-C3N4 nanocomposite (LNCN)

LNCN nanocomposite was synthesized by facile ultrasonication strategy, continuous stirring process and solvothermal method. The specific procedure of fabricating LNCN is displayed in Fig. 1. Firstly, stoichiometric amount of LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 was separately suspended into double absolute ethanol under ultra-sonication for 30 min. Then, LaNiO3 suspension was slowly added to ethanol contented g-C3N4 under stirred and again ultra-sonicated for 30 min. After that, the mixed solution was stirring at environment temperature for 12 h and transfered to solvothermal kettle to heat at 120 °C for 6 h. At last, the mixture was centrifuged and dried overnight at 80 °C. The samples containing different g-C3N4 to LaNiO3/g-C3N4 contents (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90wt %) were labelled as LNCN2 ~ LNCN9, respectively.

Fig. 1

The fabrication procedure of LNCN nanocomposite


Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) was tested on a Shimadzu Maxima X-ray diffractometer (XRD 7000) with Cu Kα radiation at a current of 30 mA and a voltage of 40 kV. The textural structures and surface morphologies of obtained samples were analyzed by a Scanning Electron microscope (SEM, HITACHI S-4800) and TEM images were performed on a FEI Talos F200S Transmission Electron microscope. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out using a ThermoFisher electron spectrometer (ESCSLAB 250Xi) with a monochromatized microfocused Al X-ray source. The binding energy was calibrated using C1s peak at 284.6 eV as the reference energy. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) was tested on a Shimadzu IRAffinity-1 using K-Br plate applied for observation of further structural information in the range of 4000 ~ 500 cm−1. The specific surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution of prepared photocatalysts were measured using a Quantachrome instrument and calculated by the nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods at liquid nitrogen temperature. The evolution amount of H2 was detected on a Shimadzu gas chromatograph (GC-2014C) by manual injection.

Photocatalytic experiment

Photocatalytic hydrogen production experiment was conducted by a homemade quartz reactor containing 0.03 g as-prepared catalyst suspended in 30 ml of 10 vol % CH3OH (aq). Methanol was used as a hole scavenger and without adding any noble metal as co-catalyst. After fully dispersed by using ultrasonic dispersion, the mixture solution was bubbled with high purity N2 for 30 min to remove the dissolved oxygen. A 300 W Xenon lamp light (PLS-SXE300) was used as the UV-light source (250 < λ < 380 nm) to irradiate the quartz reactor for several hours and the reaction kept at room temperature. The gas chromatograph equipped with a molecular sieve column and TCD detector was used to monitor the H2 evolution rate every hour and we toke manual injection method using a gas injector. During the experiment, in order to prohibit particle settlement at the bottom of the reactor, the solution was kept under constant stirring with a magnetic stirrer. It was worth mentioning that we all over took three repeated trials for every sample in order to ensure the reliability of as-obtained data. The photocatalytic stability and recyclability was tested for LNCN7 within 20 h, and every four hours was a cycle.

Results and discussions

XRD spectra analysis

Figure 2 present the XRD patterns of pristine g-C3N4, LaNiO3 and LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites with various doping ratios of g-C3N4. It could be seen g-C3N4 had one remarkable diffraction peak at 2θ = 27.2°, which could be assigned to the (0 0 2) facet of g-C3N4. There were a number of diffraction peaks of pure LaNiO3 at 23.3°, 32.9°, 40.7°, 47.4°, 53.8°, 58.8°, 68.8° and 78.9°, corresponding well to (1 0 1), (1 1 0), (0 2 1), (2 0 2), (2 1 1), (1 2 2), (2 2 0) and (3 1 2) crystal planes of perovskite-type LaNiO3 (JCPDS Card No. 34-1181), respectively, indicating the high crystallinity of LaNiO3 prepared by sol–gel method [48]. For the series LNCN nanocomposites samples, the diffraction peaks basically retained the characteristic of pure LaNiO3 and g-C3N4. What’s more, peaks around at 27.2° were gradually increased with the increase of the doping ratio of g-C3N4 in the samples. The crystallite size can be calculated by the following Scherrer formula:

$$ Dp\;\text{ = }\;\frac{0.94\lambda }{{\beta \;1\text{/}2\;\cos \theta }}. $$
Fig. 2

XRD patterns of pure g-C3N4, pure LaNiO3 and series of LNCN over the 2θ range of 10–80°

where λ is the wavelength (Cu-K), β1/2 is the broadening of the diffraction line measured at half of the maximum intensity, θ is the Bragg angle for a given diffraction, and Dp represents the crystallite size. The size of LNCN7 nanocomposite (14.30 nm) was slightly reduced compared with pure LaNiO3 (Dp = 16.23 nm) from the highest intensity peak of the (1 1 0) plane. Guessing that maybe because the aggregated LaNiO3 particles were greatly distributed on the surface of g-C3N4 nanosheets. All above these results confirmed the establishment of the interaction between LaNiO3 and g-C3N4.

SEM and TEM analysis

The surface microscopic morphologies of the g-C3N4, LaNiO3 and LNCN7 samples were tested by SEM. Figure 3(a) depicted that g-C3N4 were stacked by amount of irregular layered nanosheets structure and had relatively bigger smooth surface thus can be better as a substrate. From Fig. 3b, c, indicating the pure LaNiO3 were consisted of many aggregated spherical nanoparticles. The SEM images of Fig. 3d, e clearly revealed that LaNiO3 particles were well dispersed and deposed on the surface of g-C3N4. Figure 3(f) further present the morphology of LNCN7 after 20 h photocatalytic water splitting experiments, the picture showed that the catalyst still almost held the original appearance owing to its good stability and strong interaction on the interface.

Fig. 3

SEM images of a g-C3N4, b, c LaNiO3; d, e LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4; f LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4 after catalytic reaction

Moreover, the TEM and HRTEM analysis was further performed to verify the internal microstructure and nanoparticles size of as-obtained catalysts. Figure 4(a) shows the TEM and HRTEM of pristine LaNiO3, from the pictures, we could know the LaNiO3 sphere-like aggregated particles with a mean diameter about 20 nm which was basically consistent with the calculation result of crystallite size (Dp = 16.23 nm) obtained from XRD. The appropriately smaller particle size of our as-prepared perovskite-type semiconductor had several advantages for photocatalytic reaction. On the one hand, shortening the distance of photogenerated carriers migrated from the interior of the catalyst to the surface, thereby increasing the carriers’ migration rate and reducing the recombination rate. On the other hand, increasing the atomic number on the surface of particle and thus improving light absorption efficiency. Besides, smaller particle size nanoparticles have larger specific surface area and more reactive centers. Figure 4(b) displayed the TEM and partial area’s HRTEM images of Z-scheme heterostructure catalyst LNCN7 with a fringe width of about 0.27 nm indexed to the (1 1 0) plane of LaNiO3. It appeared that large amounts of dark aggregated particles were well dispersed on the big irregular wrinkled surface which could be considered that these LaNiO3 particles had successfully loaded on the surface of g-C3N4 and formed the heterostructure. This structure would be beneficial to enhance the photocatalytic performance by improving the separation efficiency of electrons and holes. Besides, corresponding to the highest intensity (1 1 0) plane of LaNiO3 crystals, we clearly observed lattice fringes with a width of about 0.27 nm. Figure 4(c–h) presented the high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and corresponding elemental mapping images of selected area of LNCN7, from which we could observe the composition and distribution of elements on this composite. It can be obtained that both C and N elements were distributed throughout the images (Fig. 4g, h) and La, Ni, O three kinds elements were exactly situated at the location of LaNiO3 particles (Fig. 3d–f). Additionally, from the energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra in Additional file 1: Fig. S1, we would once again confirm the formation of LaNiO3/g-C3N4 and this result would be further supported by XPS analysis.

Fig. 4

a TEM and HRTEM of LaNiO3; b TEM and HRTEM of LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4; c HAADF-STEM image and dh elemental mappings of LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4

XPS analysis

As displayed in Fig. 5 X-ray, photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) tests were conducted to verify the surface chemical composition and the chemical states for the LNCN7 sample. Figure 5a depicted the overall XPS survey spectrum, it revealed that C and N elements were detected in both pristine g-C3N4 and LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4, while elemental signals of La, Ni and O were only observed in the latter, which were well consistent with the results of EDX measurements. High resolution XPS spectra, as performed in Fig. 5(b–f), were further analyzed to obtain the information of chemical states. In the high resolution C 1 s XPS spectra (Fig. 5b), two main distinctly peaks at 284.91 eV and 288.21 eV were observed for pure g-C3N4, which were indexed to sp2 C–C bond and N–C = N bond in the aromatic ring of g-C3N4 [49]. For LNCN7, the binding energies of C 1 s at 284.81 eV and 288.20 eV shifted to lower binding energies than pure g-C3N4. In Fig. 5(c), three main peaks for N 1 s of g-C3N4 were observed at 398.8 eV, 400.0 eV and 401.2 eV, these peaks could be attributed to the N = C-N, N-(C)3 and C-N–H, respectively [50, 51]. Surprisingly, which was similar to C 1 s, the binding energies of N 1 s for LNCN7 sample also shifted to lower binding energies (398.7, 399.8, 401.1 eV) by about 0.1–0.2 eV compared with g-C3N4. The similar phenomenon might result from the formation and presence of the strong interaction between LaNiO3 and g-C3N4, which could demonstrate that the chemical states of C and N surroundings in LNCN7 had changed [52]. In the case of high resolution O 1 s spectra (Fig. 5d) for LNCN7, the peak could be deconvoluted into two main peaks at 531.6 eV and 528.4 eV, corresponding to the surface adsorbed oxygen and the crystal lattice oxygen. Figure 5e showed the high resolution spectrum of La 3d for LNCN7, four peaks at 834.0, 837.0, 850.8, and 854.5 eV were observed to correspond to the binding energies of La 3d5/2 and 3d3/2, respectively. Importantly, it could confirm the existence of La3+ ions in oxide [52, 53]. As shown in Fig. 5f, two La 3d3/2 peaks (850.8 and 854.5 eV) were overlapped with peaks of nickel. Besides, the peaks at 854.7, 860.6, 862.8, 865.4, and 872.6 eV were indexed to the binding energies of Ni 2p3/2 and Ni 2p1/2 for LNCN7 composite, which was characteristic of the Ni3+ cation [54]. Above all, these XPS results further confirmed that the successful synthesis of LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites.

Fig. 5

a XPS spectrum surveys scan for LNCN7 and pure CN; high resolution (b) C 1 s and (c) N 1 s for LNCN7 and pure CN; high resolution XPS spectra of (d) O 1 s, e La 3d and f Ni 2p for LNCN7 composite

FTIR spectra

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of as-obtained g-C3N4, LaNiO3 and a series of LaNiO3/g-C3N4 were displayed in Fig. 6, which present the change of different spectra along with the progressively increase of CN in LNCN composite. In the spectra of g-C3N4 and LaNiO3/g-C3N4, the obviously absorption peak nearly at 3200 cm−1 was regarded as the stretching and bending vibrations of N–H which come from the uncondensed terminal amino groups. This indicates that the amino functions still existed in the products by directly heating the urea. In the region of 1200–1650 cm−1, several strong peaks were ascribed to typical aromatic heterocycle stretches of the g-C3N4 [55, 56]. For pure g-C3N4, the characteristic peaks at 1294.5, 1435.6, and 1597.2 cm−1 were consistent with the stretching modes of the C-N framework structure of the conjugated aromatic ring. Moreover, the breathing vibration of s-triazine for g-C3N4 result in the characteristic absorption peak at 810 cm−1 [57]. What’s more, the characteristic peaks of LaNiO3 at 565 cm−1 were related to the bending and tensile vibration of Ni–O and correspond to the perovskite structure. Strikingly, accompanying with the increase of g-C3N4 content in LNCN samples, the intensities of above three types of peaks were gradually strengthened, which may be due to the fact that the formation of heterojunction changes the chemical environment around the chemical bond.

Fig. 6

FTIR spectra of g-C3N4, LaNiO3 and LaNiO3/g-C3N4

BET analysis

The porous structures and specific surface areas of as-obtained samples were characteristic using nitrogen adsorption–desorption experiments at 77 K, and the corresponding curves and data were shown in Fig. 7 and Additional file 1: Table S1. As shown in Fig. 7a, we could see that all as-obtained samples reveal type IV curves with an H3-type hysteresis loop, according to the Brunauer-Deming-Deming-Teller (BDDT) classification, which represent that the existence of abundant mesoporous structure in our samples [45]. Figure 7b further depicted the corresponding BJH pore size distribution curves, suggesting that these samples had a wide pore size range of 2–120 nm and most of the pore diameters were in the range of 2-12 nm. This figure further illustrated that the material we prepared own mesoporous structure. From the figure we could see that the pore volume of LNCN7, LNCN5, LNCN3, pure CN and pure LNO showing a decreasing pattern. Mesoporous structure could provide more reaction sites and active sites so that strengthen photocatalytic activity and accelerate the reaction rate.

Fig. 7

Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms (a) and pore size distribution curves; b of all as-obtained samples

What’s more, Additional file 1: Table S1 clearly displayed the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface areas, mean pore diameter and pore volume of pure g-C3N4, LaNiO3 and LaNiO3/g-C3N4 composites. The mean pore diameter listed in the table further demonstrated that our as-obtained samples were classified to mesoporous structure materials. Evidently, the BET specific surface areas of LNCN composites were gradually larger than that of pristine LaNiO3 with the rising of content, and then slightly decreased with the further increasing of g-C3N4 content. As we all know, normally, the larger specific surface area also could improve light absorption efficiency and provide more reaction sites so that strengthen photocatalytic activity and accelerate the reaction rate. Coincidently, the pore volume also exist the similar trend of changing. From the Additional file 1: Table S1 we could observed that the LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4 composites gained the highest BET specific surface area (66.06 m2 g−1) and the maximum pore volume (0.289 cc g−1) compared with others. In the following part, the photocatalytic experiment would also indicated that LNCN7 sample had the fastest hydrogen evolution rate, which proved that the BET specific surface area and pore volume might performed extremely important characters for photocatalytic properties. So what caused the changing of specific surface area? After the formation of the heterojunction material, the originally aggregated LaNiO3 nanoparticles were uniformly dispersed on the g-C3N4 nanosheets and thus exposed a larger reaction surface. When the doping ratio of g-C3N4 achieved 70%, nanoparticles could exactly uniformly distribute on the nanosheets and achieve the optimal doping state.

Photocatalytic activity and stability for H2 production

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution performances of synthesized LNO, CN, and LNCN nanoparticles were tested in aqueous solution containing 10 vol % methanol as sacrificial reagent under 300 W Xe lamp irradiation which was equipped with a filter with a wavenumber of 250–380 nm. The H2 evolution amount shown in Fig. 8 was detected by means of a gas chromatograph. As shown in Fig. 8a, b, we performed three parallel tests over all samples and calculated the average value of H2 evolution rate so that we could eliminate the accidental factors and obtain more convincing data. The H2 evolution rate for neat LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 was 135.9 µmol h−1 g−1 and 124.4 µmol h−1 g−1, respectively. Obviously, the LNCN heterojunction composites universally showed higher H2 evolution activity compared with neat LNO and CN. In all composite materials, the H2 evolution rate gradually increased with the increasing of g-C3N4 content. LNCN7 composite reached an optimal yield of up to 3392.50 µmol g−1 in 5 h and possessed the highest rate of 678.5 µmol h−1 g−1 which was nearly 5 times than that of pure LNO. The improvement of photocatalytic activity may be due to the attendance of g-C3N4 would reduce the recombination rate of photoexcited carriers effectively and generate more effective electrons in LNCN Z-scheme system for generating hydrogen. Besides, the doping ratio could change the distribution state of nanoparticles on the nanosheet, and then affect the material’s crystal structure, specific surface area, pore size, pore volume and other properties, thereby affecting the catalytic activity. A series of characterization tests revealed that heterojunction catalyst with the content of g-C3N4 in LNCN was 70% present the superior crystal phase structure, the largest specific surface area and pore volume. These features were beneficial to enhance the activity of catalytic hydrogen production. On the contrary, further improving the content of g-C3N4 would reduce the catalytic effect. Therefore, LNCN7 has the largest hydrogen production rate.

Fig. 8

a Photocatalytic H2 evolution rate as a function of irradiation time of 5 h over LNO, CN and LNCN [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]; b Photocatalytic H2 evolution rate for three repeated tests over samples with different content of g-C3N4 and the corresponding standard deviation map; c Long-term stability test of LNCN7 composite for 20 h

As presented in Fig. 8c, the long-term photocatalytic stability experiment of LNCN7 was conducted for five cycles under same reaction conditions. It can be seen that the H2 production amounts of the fifth cycle for LNCN7 was reduced to 2246.9 µmol g−1 after 5 h and only 10.7% H2 production was lost compared with the first cycle. The result revealed that LNCN7 composite almost held stable during the long-term test and it was provided with good stability in the photocatalytic reaction.

What’s more, there was no distinct change in the XRD diffraction patterns and FT-IR images of LNCN7 before and after five cyclic photocatalytic experiments, as observed in Fig. 9a, b, respectively. The results further confirmed the former conclusion that our synthesized LNCN7 nanoparticles had good stability and sturdy crystal structure.

Fig. 9

XRD diffraction patterns (a) and FT-IR images (b) of LNCN7 before and after long-term photocatalytic experiment

Proposed photocatalytic mechanism for H2 production

On the basis of above analysis and experimental results, LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposite performed higher H2 evolution efficiency than that of pure LaNiO3 and g-C3N4, which might result from the combination of these two semiconductors and the formation of the solid–solid interfacial between them. As depicted in Fig. 10, a direct Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism was proposed to specifically describe the migration route of photogenerated carriers and the related reactions process in the system [58, 59]. We could utilize the energy band theory of semiconductors to explain the principle of photocatalytic hydrogen production reaction. All semiconductors existed the forbidden band width, and they were excited to generate electron–hole pairs under light irradiation when the photon energy was equal or higher than the width of forbidden band. Because of owing the narrow band gap, electrons in both LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 were excited to transfer from valance band (VB) to conduction band (CB) under UV-light irradiation, and thus took shape the electron–hole pairs.

Fig. 10

The proposed photocatalytic H2 production mechanism using CH3OH as the sacrificial agent over LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterostructure nanocomposites

Here, existing two typical photogenerated charge carrier separation mechanism for the binary heterojunction system: the traditional transfer mechanism and the direct Z-scheme mechanism [52]. We assumed that the system made use of the former type of mechanism. In this situation, the photogenerated electrons in the CB of g-C3N4 would migrate to that of LaNiO3, which could weaken the reducibility of photoexcited electrons (potential energy from −1.12 eV to 0.23 eV). And the electrons gathered in the CB of LNO didn’t have the capability to reduce H+ into H2 due to the more negative standard reduction potential of H2O/H2 (−0.42 eV). Similarly, the holes generated in the VB of LNO also moved to that of g-C3N4, which would lead to the decline of oxidizing ability. Therefore, the traditional transfer mechanism was not applicable to our photocatalytic system. As a result, the charge transfered in LNCN most likely followed by a Z-scheme mechanism. Under the electrostatic interaction of the material interior, the photogenerated electrons from the CB of LaNiO3 and the photogenerated holes from the VB of g-C3N4 individually migrated to the solid–solid hetero-interfacial and then recombined. The recombination behavior improved the separation of the photogenerated carriers both in LaNiO3 and g-C3N4, effectively. The electrons accumulated in the CB of g-C3N4 participated in H2 evolution reaction and thus we could get the target product. Simultaneously, the extra holes from the VB of LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 were captured and depleted by the sacrificial agent (methanol) in order to enhance the photocatalytic effect. To sum up, the specific reaction process could refer as following steps:

$$ \text{LaNiO}_{\text{3}} \;\text{/}\;\text{g} - \;\text{C}_{\text{3}} \text{N}_{\text{4}} \;{ + hv \to e}_{{\left( {\text{LNO}} \right)}}^ - \;\text{ + }\;\text{h}_{{\left( {\text{LNO}} \right)}}^{\text{ + }} \;\text{ + }\;\text{e}_{{\left( {\text{CN}} \right)}}^ - \;\text{ + }\;\text{h}_{{\left( {\text{CN}} \right)}}^{\text{ + }} $$
$$ \text{e}_{{\left( {\text{LNO}} \right)}}^ - \;\text{ + }\;\text{h}_{{\left( {\text{CN}} \right)}}^{\text{ + }} \;{ \to }\;\text{Migration}\;\text{and}\;\text{recombination} $$
$$ \text{H}_{\text{2}} \text{O}\;\text{ + }\;\text{2h}_{{\left( {\text{LNO}} \right)}}^{\text{ + }} \;{ \to }\;\text{1/}\;\text{2O}_{\text{2}} \;\text{ + }\;\text{2H}^{\text{ + }} $$
$$ 2e_{{\left( {CN} \right)}}^ - \;\text{ + }\;2H^{\text{ + }} \; \to \;H_{2} \;\left( g \right) $$


In this study, a direct Z-scheme heterostructure photocatalyst LaNiO3/g-C3N4 with different content of g-C3N4 was successfully fabricated through a facile ultrasonication strategy, continuous stirring process and solvothermal method, successively. We already confirmed that the as-obtained LNCN nanoparticles formed strong interaction between the solid–solid interface of LaNiO3 and g-C3N4 by means of a series of characterization methods. No surprisingly, all as-prepared LNCN samples universally exhibited enhanced performance towards photocatalytic water splitting reaction under UV-light irradiation even with the absence of co-catalyst like noble metal. It was worth mentioning that LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4 composite displayed the highest H2 evolution rate of 678.5 µmol h−1 g−1 which was almost 5 times than that of single LaNiO3 (135.9 µmolh−1g−1). Besides, the LNCN7 heterojunction nanocomposite behaved great photocatalytic stability during the long-term reaction process. The effective improving of hydrogen production rate for LNCN composites might result from the strong interfacial interaction which could electrons from LNO and holes from CN migrated and recombined, and thus suppress the recombination of photogenerated charge carriers both in LNO and CN. As a result, the LNCN Z-scheme heterostructure photocatalysis system would not only broaden the light response area and promote the utilization of solar energy, but also enhance the photocatalytic ability. In conclusion, facing the situation of environmental remediation and solar energy conversion, it was worth taking further actions to explore and develop more novel Z-scheme photocatalysts based on perovskite or polymer which were highly-efficient, economical and environmentally friendly.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.


  1. 1.

    Basu RDTA. Review Article Photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen production. Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2017:56-62

  2. 2.

    Jafari T, Moharreri E, Amin A, Miao R, Song W, Suib S (2016) Photocatalytic water splitting—the untamed dream: a review of recent advances. Molecules 21(7):900

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ismail AA, Bahnemann DW (2014) Photochemical splitting of water for hydrogen production by photocatalysis: a review. Sol Energ Mat Sol C 128:85–101

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ab XZAY. Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting†. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015(44, 5148):5148-80

  5. 5.

    Gobara HM, Nassar IM, El Naggar AMA, Eshaq G (2017) Nanocrystalline spinel ferrite for an enriched production of hydrogen through a solar energy stimulated water splitting process. Energy 118:1234–1242

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Maeda K (2011) Photocatalytic water splitting using semiconductor particles: History and recent developments. J Photochem Photobiol C Photochem Rev 12(4):237–268

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ran J, Zhang J, Yu J, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ (2014) Earth-abundant cocatalysts for semiconductor-based photocatalytic water splitting. Chem Soc Rev 43(22):7787–7812

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Onishi H. Sodium Tantalate Photocatalysts Doped with Metal Cations: Why Are They Active for Water Splitting? Chem Sus Chem. 2019 2019-03-26

  9. 9.

    Xu Y, Zhang B (2015) Hydrogen photogeneration from water on the biomimetic hybrid artificial photocatalytic systems of semiconductors and earth-abundant metal complexes: progress and challenges. Catal Sci Technol 5(6):384–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Maeda K (2014) Rhodium-doped barium titanate perovskite as a stable p-Type semiconductor photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution under visible light. ACS Appl Mater Inter 6(3):2167–2173

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wu P, Shi J, Zhou Z, Tang W, Guo L (2012) CaTaO2N–CaZrO3 solid solution: Band-structure engineering and visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energ 37(18):13704–13710

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ouyang S, Tong H, Umezawa N, Cao J, Li P, Bi Y, et al. Surface-Alkalinization-Induced Enhancement of Photocatalytic H2 Evolution over SrTiO3 -Based Photocatalysts. 2012

  13. 13.

    S. Acharya SMAK. The enhanced photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4-LaFeO3 for the water reduction reaction through a mediator free Z-scheme mechanism. Inorg Chem Front. 2017. 4:1022-32

  14. 14.

    Parida KM, Reddy KH, Martha S, Das DP, Biswal N (2010) Fabrication of nanocrystalline LaFeO3: An efficient sol–gel auto-combustion assisted visible light responsive photocatalyst for water decomposition. Int J Hydrogen Energ 35(22):12161–12168

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li J, Zeng J, Jia L, Fang W. Investigations on the effect of Cu2 +/Cu1 + redox couples and oxygen vacancies on photocatalytic activity of treated LaNi1 − xCuxO3 (x = 0.1, 0.4, 0.5). Int J Hydrogen Energ. 2010. 35(23):12733-40

  16. 16.

    Wang L, Pang Q, Song Q, Pan X, Jia L (2015) Novel microbial synthesis of Cu doped LaCoO3 photocatalyst and its high efficient hydrogen production from formaldehyde solution under visible light irradiation. Fuel 140:267–274

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wang J, Cui C, Kong Q, Ren C, Li Z, Qu L et al (2018) Mn-Doped g-C3N4 nanoribbon for efficient visible-light photocatalytic water splitting coupling with methylene blue degradation. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(7):8754–8761

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gupta A, Chemelewski WD, Buddie Mullins C, Goodenough JB (2015) High-rate oxygen evolution reaction on Al-Doped LiNiO2. Adv Mater 27(39):6063–6067

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li Y, Hu Y, Fang T, Li Z, Zou Z (2018) Promoted photoelectrochemical activity of BiVO4 coupled with LaFeO3 and LaCoO3. Res Chem Intermediat 44(2):1013–1024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dhinesh Kumar R, Thangappan R, Jayavel R. Synthesis and characterization of LaFeO3/TiO2 nanocomposites for visible light photocatalytic activity. 2017

  21. 21.

    Ling F, Anthony OC, Xiong Q, Luo M, Pan X, Jia L et al (2016) PdO/LaCoO3 heterojunction photocatalysts for highly hydrogen production from formaldehyde aqueous solution under visible light. Int J Hydrogen Energ 41(14):6115–6122

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chu J, Han X, Yu Z, Du Y, Song B, Xu P (2018) Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production on CdS/Cu7S4/g-C3N4 ternary heterostructures. ACS Appl Mater Inter 10(24):20404–20411

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yu Q, Meng X, Wang T, Li P, Liu L, Chang K et al (2015) A highly durable p-LaFeO3/n-Fe2O3 photocell for effective water splitting under visible light. Chem Commun 51(17):3630–3633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Jia L, Li J, Fang W (2009) Enhanced visible-light active C and Fe co-doped LaCoO3 for reduction of carbon dioxide. Catal Commun 11(2):87–90

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang J, Zhang C, Li W, Guo Q, Gao H, You Y et al (2018) Nitrogen-doped perovskite as a bifunctional cathode catalyst for rechargeable lithium-oxygen batteries. ACS Appl Mater Inter 10(6):5543–5550

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Zhang G, Jiang W, Hua S, Zhao H, Zhang L, Sun Z (2016) Constructing bulk defective perovskite SrTiO3 nanocubes for high performance photocatalysts. Nanoscale 8(38):16963–16968

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tada H, Fujishima M, Kobayashi H (2011) Photodeposition of metal sulfide quantum dots on titanium(IV) dioxide and the applications to solar energy conversion. Chem Soc Rev 40(7):4232–4243

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Jiang D, Wang T, Xu Q, Li D, Meng S, Chen M (2017) Perovskite oxide ultrathin with significantly enhanced photocatalytic activity towards the photodegradation of tetracycline. Appl Catalysis B Environ 201:617–628

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Paramanik L, Reddy KH, Sultana S, Parida K (2018) Architecture of biperovskite-based LaCrO3/PbTiO3 p–n heterojunction with a strong interface for enhanced charge anti-recombination process and visible light-induced photocatalytic reactions. Inorg Chem 57(24):15133–15148

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Luo J, Zhou X, Ning X, Zhan L, Ma L, Xu X et al (2018) Utilization of LaCoO3 as an efficient co-catalyst to boost the visible light photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4. Sep Purif Technol 201:309–317

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Venkatesham N, Tejasree C, Devi DK, Edukondalu A, Somaiah PV (2018) Synthesis and characterization of SrTiO3 and g-C3N4-SrTiO3 nanocomposite by screw capped method. Mater Res Express 6(1):15902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kumar A, Schuerings C, Kumar S, Kumar A, Krishnan V (2018) Perovskite-structured CaTiO3 coupled with g-C3N4 as a heterojunction photocatalyst for organic pollutant degradation. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 9:671–685

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Acharya S, Padhi DK, Parida KM. Visible light driven LaFeO3 nano sphere/RGO composite photocatalysts for efficient water decomposition reaction. Catal Today. 2017

  34. 34.

    Lv T, Wu M, Guo M, Liu Q, Jia L (2019) Self-assembly photocatalytic reduction synthesis of graphene-encapusulated LaNiO3 nanoreactor with high efficiency and stability for photocatalytic water splitting to hydrogen. Chem Eng J 356:580–591

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Amene Naseri AMSC, B ASR. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4)-based photocatalysts for solar hydrogen generation: recent advances and future development directions. 2017

  36. 36.

    Jiang L, Yuan X, Pan Y, Liang J, Zeng G, Wu Z, et al. Doping of graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalysis: A reveiw. 2017

  37. 37.

    Li Zhou AHZA, Jinc SWAA (2016) Recent advances in non-metal modification of graphitic carbon nitride for photocatalysis: a historic review. Catal Sci Technol 6:7002–7023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Patnaik S, Martha S, Parida KM (2016) An overview of the structural, textural and morphological modulations of g-C3N4 towards photocatalytic hydrogen production. RSC Adv 6(52):46929–46951

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mahzoon S, Nowee SM, Haghighi M (2018) Synergetic combination of 1D-2D g-C3N4 heterojunction nanophotocatalyst for hydrogen production via water splitting under visible light irradiation. Renew Energ 127:433–443

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Xu Q, Zhu B, Jiang C, Cheng B, Yu J (2018) Constructing 2D/2D Fe2O3/g-C3N4 Direct Z-Scheme Photocatalysts with Enhanced H2 Generation Performance. Solar RRL 2(3):1800006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liu Y, Zhang H, Ke J, Zhang J, Tian W, Xu X et al (2018) 0D (MoS2)/2D (g-C3N4) heterojunctions in Z-scheme for enhanced photocatalytic and electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Appl Catal B 228:64–74

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ou M, Tu W, Yin S, Xing W, Wu S, Wang H et al (2018) Amino-assisted anchoring of CsPbBr 3 perovskite quantum dots on porous g-C3N4 for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angewandte Chemie 130(41):13758–13762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Xian T, Yang H, Di LJ, Dai JF (2015) Enhanced photocatalytic activity of BaTiO3@g-C3N4 for the degradation of methyl orange under simulated sunlight irradiation. J Alloy Compd 622:1098–1104

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Xu K, Feng J (2017) Superior photocatalytic performance of LaFeO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv 7(72):45369–45376

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zhou X, Chen Y, Li C, Zhang L, Zhang X, Ning X et al (2019) Construction of LaNiO3 nanoparticles modified g-C3N4 nanosheets for enhancing visible light photocatalytic activity towards tetracycline degradation. Sep Purif Technol 211:179–188

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Khettab M, Omeiri S, Sellam D, Ladjouzi MA, Trari M (2012) Characterization of LaNiO3 prepared by sol–gel: Application to hydrogen evolution under visible light. Mater Chem Phys 132(2–3):625–630

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Li Y, Yao S, Wen W, Xue L, Yan Y (2010) Sol–gel combustion synthesis and visible-light-driven photocatalytic property of perovskite LaNiO3. J Alloy Compd 491(1–2):560–564

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li L, Song Y, Jiang B, Wang K, Zhang Q (2017) A novel oxygen carrier for chemical looping reforming: LaNiO3 perovskite supported on montmorillonite. Energy 131:58–66

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Luo J, Zhou X, Ning X, Zhan L, Chen J, Li Z (2018) Constructing a direct Z-scheme La2NiO4/g-C3N4 hybrid photocatalyst with boosted visible light photocatalytic activity. Sep Purif Technol 201:327–335

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Guo S, Tang Y, Xie Y, Tian C, Feng Q, Zhou W et al (2017) P-doped tubular g-C3N4 with surface carbon defects: Universal synthesis and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl Catal B 218:664–671

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hu C, Hung W, Wang M, Lu P (2018) Phosphorus and sulfur codoped g-C3N4 as an efficient metal-free photocatalyst. Carbon 127:374–383

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Jin L, Zhou X, Ning X, Zhan L, Kong M, Tan K et al (2018) Boosting visible light photocatalytic performance of g-C3N4 nanosheets by combining with LaFeO3 nanoparticles. Mater Res Bull 102:353–361

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rida K, Benabbas A, Bouremmad F, Peña MA, Sastre E, Martínez-Arias A (2007) Effect of calcination temperature on the structural characteristics and catalytic activity for propene combustion of sol–gel derived lanthanum chromite perovskite. Appl Catal A 327(2):173–179

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Thanh TD, Chuong ND, Balamurugan J, Van Hien H, Kim NH, Lee JH (2017) Porous hollow-structured LaNiO3 stabilized N, S-Codoped graphene as an active electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction reaction. Small 13(39):1701884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Wang W, An T, Li G, Xia D, Zhao H, Yu JC et al (2017) Earth-abundant Ni2P/g-C3N4 lamellar nanohydrids for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution and bacterial inactivation under visible light irradiation. Appl Catal B 217:570–580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tian J, Zhang L, Wang M, Jin X, Zhou Y, Liu J et al (2018) Remarkably enhanced H2 evolution activity of oxidized graphitic carbon nitride by an extremely facile K2CO3-activation approach. Appl Catal B 232:322–329

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Liu E, Jin C, Xu C, Fan J, Hu X (2018) Facile strategy to fabricate Ni2P/g-C3N4 heterojunction with excellent photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Int J Hydrogen Energ 43(46):21355–21364

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Dao V, Son LT, Nguyen TD, Van Noi N, Ngoc NM, Pham T et al (2019) Superior visible light photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4/NiWO4 direct Z system for degradation of gaseous toluene. J Solid State Chem 272:62–68

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Yu C, Chen F, Zeng D, Xie Y, Zhou W, Liu Z, et al. A facile phase transformation strategy for fabrication of novel Z-scheme ternary heterojunctions with efficient photocatalytic properties. Nanoscale. 2019

Download references


Not applicable.


Not applicable.

Author information




CY was the main author of the work, performed syntheses, and coordinated all characterization and photocatalytic experiment. RW and HW assisted with manuscript writing. FJ was the corresponding author and he provided professional revision opinions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fubin Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors listed in the manuscript have declared that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

The HAADF image and EDX spectra of LaNiO3/70%g-C3N4. Table S1. The BET specific surface area, mean pore diameter and pore volume of the as-obtained samples

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye, C., Wang, R., Wang, H. et al. The high photocatalytic efficiency and stability of LaNiO3/g-C3N4 heterojunction nanocomposites for photocatalytic water splitting to hydrogen. BMC Chemistry 14, 65 (2020).

Download citation


  • LaNiO3
  • Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride
  • Z-scheme heterostructure
  • Photocatalysis
  • Hydrogen production