Skip to main content

Design, synthesis, in silico and in vitro antimicrobial screenings of novel 1,2,4-triazoles carrying 1,2,3-triazole scaffold with lipophilic side chain tether



1,2,4-Triazoles and 1,2,3-triazoles have gained significant importance in medicinal chemistry.


This study describes a green, efficient and quick solvent free click synthesis of new 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diesters carrying a lipophilic side chain via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of diethylacetylene dicarboxylate with different surfactant azides. Further structural modifications of the resulting 1,2,3-triazole diesters to their corresponding 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones via multi-step synthesis has been also investigated. The structures of the newly designed triazoles have been elucidated based on their analytical and spectral data. These compounds were evaluated for their antimicrobial activities. Relative to the standard antimicrobial agents, derivatives of 1,2,3-triazole-bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones were the most potent antimicrobial agents with compound 7d demonstrating comparable antibacterial and antifungal activities against all tested microorganisms. Further, the selected compounds were studied for docking using the enzyme, Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase.


The in silico study reveals that all the synthesized compounds had shown good binding energy toward the target protein ranging from − 10.49 to − 5.72 kJ mol−1 and have good affinity toward the active pocket, thus, they may be considered as good inhibitors of GlcN-6-P synthase.


The synthesis of 1,2,4-triazoles has become one of the most hot and popular topic in modern heterocyclic chemistry due to their various uses. In fact, 1,2,4-triazoles have gained considerable importance in medicinal chemistry due to their potential antimicrobial [1], anticancer [2], antitubercular [3], anticonvulsant [4] and anti-inflammatory [5] properties. In addition, several well know antifungal drugs including Fluotrimazole, Ribavirine, Fluconazole, Estazolam, Alprazolam and Loreclezole [6, 7] were found to possess the 1,2,4-triazole moiety in their structures.

The 1,2,3-triazole nucleus has been also recognized as a fascinating scaffold in drug design due to its incorporation into many chemotherapeutic drug molecules as antibacterial [8], anticancer [9], antifungal [10], antiviral [11] and antimalarial [12], antimycobacterial [13] agents.

Surfactants are widely studied by researchers due to their promising chemical, industrial and biological applications. Surfactants are associated with diverse biological properties such as antimicrobial [14], anti-inflammatory [15], antiviral [16], anticancer [17], antioxidant [18] and analgesic [19] activities.

Recent research in drug discovery aimed to introduce the 1,2,3-triazole moiety as a connecting unit to link together two or more pharmacophores for the design of novel bioactive molecules. Thus, it was hypothesized that the chemical combination of 1,2,4-triazole, 1,2,3-triazole and surfactants side chain in one scaffold may prove to be a breakthrough for chemical and biological activity as continuation of our effort in the designing of novel polyheterocyclic bioactive molecules [20,21,22,23,24].

In modern drug designing, molecular docking is routinely used for understanding drug- receptor interaction. Molecular docking provides useful information about drug receptor interactions and is frequently used to predict the binding orientation of small molecule drug candidates to their protein targets in order to predict the affinity and activity of the small molecule [25]. When designing novel antimicrobial agents, enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of microbial cell walls are generally good targets. In this regard, the enzyme glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase (GlmS, GlcN-6-P synthase, l-glutamine: d-fructose-6P amido-transferase, EC is particularly attractive [26]. It is involved in the first step of the formation of the core amino-sugar, N-acetyl Glucosamine which is an essential building block of bacterial and fungal cell walls [27, 28]. Accordingly, GlcN-6-P serves as a promising target for antibacterial and antifungal drug discovery. Structural differences between prokaryotic and human enzymes may be exploited to design specific inhibitors, which may serve as prototypes of anti-fungal and anti-bacterial drugs [28]. Triazole type units have been reported to be good inhibitors of GlcN-6-P synthase [29,30,31]. Moreover, ciprofloxacin, the standard drug used for in vitro screenings in our studies, has been reported to be a good inhibitor of GlcN-6-P synthase [31,32,33,34]. Therefore, it was thought worthwhile to select GlcN-6-P synthase as the target for the synthesized triazole compounds.

Results and discussion


An optimized eco-friendly click procedure has been previously developed in our laboratory for the construction of a series of novel 4,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles via 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of dimethylacetylene dicarboxylate with different aromatic azides under solvent-free conditions. In the present work, we have investigated the applicability of the solvent-free conditions as a green procedure for the synthesis of novel non-ionic surfactants carrying 1,2,3-triazole and 1,2,4-triazole moieties. Thus, 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of diethylacetylene dicarboxylate (1) with different surfactant azides 2ad under solvent free conditions, furnished the targeted non-ionic surfactants based 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-disesters 3ad in 95–98% yields (Scheme 1). The reaction required heating in a water bath for 3 min.

Scheme 1

Synthesis of non-ionic surfactants based 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diesters 3ad

The diacid hydrazides 4ad have been prepared successfully by stirring an ethanolic solution of the synthesized di-esters 3ad with hydrazine hydrate for 4 h at room temperature (Scheme 2). Thus, the condensation of the diacid hydrazides 4ad with phenyl isothiocyanate, in refluxing ethanol for 6 h, furnished the targeted phenylthiosemicarbazide derivatives 5ad in good yields (82–87%) (Scheme 2).

Scheme 2

Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole bis-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 6ad

The 1,2,3-triazoles carrying bis-1,2,4-triazoles-3-thiones 6ad have been synthesized via intramolecular dehydrative ring closure of their corresponding thiosemicarbazide derivatives 5ad in 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide as basic catalyst as shown in Scheme 2. The reaction required heating under reflux for 6 h to afford compounds 6ad in good yields (80–85%).

The synthesis of 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 7ad pass first through the formation of the appropriate potassium dithiocarbazinate salt through the reaction of the acid hydrazides 4ad with carbon disulphide in ethanolic potassium hydroxide solution (Scheme 3). The resulting potassium salts were then subjected to intramolecular ring closure, in the presence of hydrazine hydrate under reflux for 6 h, to afford 80–84% yields of the desired 4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 7ad.

Scheme 3

Synthesis of 1,2,3-triazole bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 7ad

The newly synthesized compounds were fully characterized based on their IR, 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra. The IR spectra of the 1,2,3-triazole di-esters 3ad revealed the presence of strong absorption bands at 1738–1745 cm−1 assigned to the ester C=O groups. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3c showed a quartet at δH 4.27–4.32 ppm and a multiplet at δH 4.40–4.48 ppm characteristic for the two non-equivalent ester methylene groups. The two ester methyl protons were recorded as a triplet integrated for six protons at δH 1.41 ppm. The proton spectral analysis also showed the surfactant proton signals on their appropriate aliphatic region (see “Experimental”). Its 13C NMR spectrum revealed no signals on the sp-carbon regions confirming the success of the cycloaddition reaction, and two characteristic signals appeared at δC 158.72 and 160.33 ppm attributed to the two ester carbonyl carbons (C=O). The surfactant side chain carbons appeared in their expected aliphatic region.

The success of the hydrazinolysis reaction was confirmed by the spectral data analysis of the diacid hydrazides 4ad. Their IR spectra showed characteristic NH and NH2 bands of the hydrazide functionalities near 3246–3367 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectrum of the diacid hydrazide 4b was taken as example to confirm the success of the reaction. It showed the disappearance of the ethyl ester protons (CH2CH3) and the appearance of new multiplet at δH 4.74–4.79 ppm assignable to the NH2 and NCH2 groups. The two non-equivalent NH amide protons were assigned to two singlets at δH 10.42 and 11.83 ppm. The 13C NMR spectrum also confirmed the success of the hydrazinolysis reaction through, first the absence of the two ethoxy signals from their chemical shift regions, second the appearance of the two carbonyl hydrazide moieties at lower frequencies (δC 155.46 and 159.23 ppm) compared to their ester precursors (δC 158.72 and 160.33 ppm).

The IR spectra of the thiosemicarbazides 5ad revealed the presence of the thiocarbonyl groups (C=S) by the appearance of new absorption bands at 1289–1298 cm−1. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 5a was characterized by the disappearance of the NH2 signals and appearance of ten aromatic protons of the two phenyl rings at δH 7.12–7.74 ppm, confirmed the success of the condensation reaction. The two NH-protons bonded to the two phenyl groups appeared as two singlets at δH 9.64 and 9.67 ppm. The 1H NMR also showed four singlets at δH 9.90, 10.08, 11.23 and 11.55 ppm integrated for four protons related to the NH amidic (NHCO) and NH thioamidic (NHCS) protons of the two thiosemicarbazide moieties. The 13C NMR spectrum also approve the formation of the expected thiosemicarbazide product 5a through the appearance of the aromatic carbons at δC 124.04–138.90 ppm and the presence of two characteristic signals at δC 180.18 and 181.07 ppm attributed to the two thiocarbonyl groups (C=S). Additionally, the spectrum revealed the aliphatic carbons for the surfactant side chain on their expected chemical shifts.

In the IR spectra of compounds 6ad, the absence of the carbonyl (C=O) and thiocarbonyl (C=S) absorption bands and the presence of new absorption band near 1608–1615 cm−1 characteristic for the C=N groups confirmed the success of the intramolecular ring closure to form 1,2,4-triazole-3-thione. In addition, the exhibited chemical shifts obtained from their 1H NMR, 13C NMR and spectra were all supported the proposed structures of 6ad. The 1H NMR spectrum of compound 6d revealed the appearance of a diagnostic broad singlet at δC 10.60 ppm assignable to the NH’s of the thione isomer. The phenyl protons resonated as a multiplet at δH 7.02–7.49 ppm. In the 13C NMR spectrum of compound 6d, the C=S signals appeared at 187.84 ppm confirming the predominance of the thione isomer. Furthermore, the aromatic carbons and the surfactant side chain carbons were observed on their appropriate chemical shifts.

The structures of the aminotriazoles 7ad have been also deduced from their elemental and spectral data. In their IR spectra, the presence of strong absorption bands at 1288–1296 and 3275–3380 cm−1 attributed to the C=S, NH and NH2 functional groups confirmed the formation of the 1,2,4-triazole ring. The 1H-NMR analysis revealed the presence of two diagnostic singlets at δH 5.19–5.27 ppm (NH2) and 9.21–9.31 ppm (NH), confirming the presence of the triazole ring in its thione form. In their 13C-NMR spectra, the presence of signals at δC 187.60–187.68 ppm attributed to the thiocarbonyl carbons (C=S), which were not observed on their corresponding starting hydrazides 4ad is another support for the predominance of the thione form.

Antimicrobial evaluation

Antimicrobial activities of the newly synthesized compounds were evaluated against a panel of pathogenic microorganisms including Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi. Antimicrobial activities were expressed as the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) that is defined as the least concentration of the examined compound resulted in more than 80% growth inhibition of the microorganism [35, 36]. Bacillus cereus, Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus were used as model microorganisms representing Gram positive bacteria while Proteus mirabilis, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used as representative of the Gram negative bacteria. On the other hand, Candida albicans and Aspergillus brasiliensis were chosen to study the antifungal activities of the synthesized compounds under examination (Table 1).

Table 1 Antimicrobial screening results of compounds 37(ad) expressed as MIC defined as the least concentration that cause more than 80% growth inhibition of the microorganism (μg/mL)

Antibacterial and antifungal screening revealed that some of the examined compounds demonstrated fair to excellent antimicrobial activities relative to Ciprofloxacin and Fluconazole; standard potent antibacterial and antifungal, respectively. Among the studied compounds, 7ad emerged as the most potent antimicrobial agents relative to the standards, with MIC ranges between 1 and 32 µg/mL against Gram positive bacteria, 1–64 µg/mL against Gram negative bacteria and 1–16 µg/mL against fungi. Compared to Ciprofloxacin, compound 5,5′-(1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-5(4H)-thione) (7d) appears to exert similar or more potent antibacterial activities against all bacterial species tested. Likewise, compound 7d demonstrates a comparable antifungal activity to that of the potent standard Fluconazole. Interestingly, increasing the carbon chain length substitution on the 1,2,3-triazole moiety of the 1,2,3-triazole-bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 7ad resulted in 2–16-folds improvement of the antimicrobial activity.

Interestingly, 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 6ad revealed similar trend of activity to that associated with the 1,2,3-triazole bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 7ad indicating an improved antimicrobial activity of the 1,2,4 triazole moiety. MIC ranges between 4 and 64 µg/mL against Gram positive bacteria, 4–128 µg/mL against Gram negative bacteria, and 2–64 µg/mL against fungi. Nonetheless, 1,2,3-triazole derivatives with the triazole bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones substitution 7ad appears to have superior antimicrobial activities over the 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis (4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 6ad suggesting a balanced hydrophylicity/hydrophobicity ratio that results in a better penetration though microorganisms’ cellular membranes; hence, augmented activities. Similarly, increasing carbon chain length of the 1,2,3-triazole moiety enhanced the effectiveness of the 1,2,3-triazole-bis-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione derivatives 6ad.

On the other hand, 1,2,3-triazole bis-acid thiosemicarbazide derivatives 5ad yielded intermediate antibacterial and antifungal activities relative to both standards, Ciprofloxacin and Fluconazole. MIC ranges between 8 and 128 µg/mL against Gram positive bacteria, 8–256 µg/mL against Gram negative bacteria, and 16–128 µg/mL against fungi. The diminished activity is probably due to the loss of the 1,2,4-triazole moiety. Structural activity relationship suggests that extending the N-1 alkyl substitution from the decyl to hexadecyl chain will enhance the antimicrobial activity by fourfolds. Whereas 1-hexadecyl-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)-bis(4-N-phenylacid thiosemicarbazide (5d) demonstrates a promising activity, relative to 5a, 5b, and 5c, against the examined strains, it is still less efficient as antimicrobial than the 1,2,4-triazole derivatives.

In view of that, 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diesters 3ad and 1,2,3-triazole diacid hydrazides 4ad were evidently less efficient to exert comparable antimicrobial activities to the previously observed activities associated with the substituted 1,2,4-triazole derivatives. Remarkably, 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diesters 3ad exhibited the least efficient antimicrobial activities against all microorganisms with MIC values ranging from 64 to 512 µg/mL against Gram positive bacteria and Gram negative bacteria, and 128–512 µg/mL against fungi. Diethyl-(1-decyl-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)diformate (3a) appears to have the least potency as an antifungal agent relative to Fluconazole. Chain extension of the N-1 alkyl substitution yielded twofolds enhancement in the antifungal activity and two to fourfolds enhancement in the antibacterial activity.

1,2,3-Triazole diacid hydrazide derivatives 4ad show a better activity than 1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diesters 3ad with MIC ranging from 32 to 256 µg/mL against Gram positive bacteria, 16–256 µg/mL against Gram negative bacteria, and 32–256 µg/mL against fungi. Analogously, increasing the hydrophobicity at the N-1 position of the 1,2,3-triazole will most likely facilitate a better cellular membrane penetration and consequently an enhanced antimicrobial activity.

Consistent with previous reports [20], and on the basis of the observed MIC values for the examined compounds, it was concluded that 1,2,4-triazole derivatives with elongated chain substitution at the 1,2,3-triazole N-1 position likely exhibit enhanced antibacterial and antifungal activities over analogous 1,2,4-triazole derivatives.

In-silico screenings (molecular docking)

In correlation to in vitro antimicrobial activity, it was thought worthy to perform molecular docking studies, hence screening the compounds, inculcating both in silico and in vitro results. The amino sugars are the significant building blocks of polysaccharides found in the cell wall of most human pathogenic microorganisms. Therefore not surprising that a number of GlcN-6-P synthase inhibitors of natural or synthetic origin display bactericidal or fungicidal properties [37]. Considering GlcN-6-P synthase as the target receptor, comparative and automated docking studies with newly synthesized candidate lead compounds was performed to determine the best in silico conformation. The molecular docking of the synthesized compounds with GlcN-6-P synthase revealed that all tested compounds have shown the bonding with one or the other amino acids in the active pockets. Figure 1 shows the docked images of selected candidate ligands including the considered standard drug i.e. Ciprofloxacin. Table 2 shows the binding energy and inhibition constant of the tested compounds including the standard. In-silico studies revealed all the synthesized molecules showed good binding energy toward the target protein ranging from − 5.72 to − 10.49 kJ mol−1.

Fig. 1

Docking of some compounds 3a, 4a, 5a, 6d, 7d and standard drug ciprofloxacin into active site of glucosamine-6-phosphate (GlcN-6-P) synthase

Table 2 Molecular docking results of the target compounds


General chemistry

Melting points were recorded on a Stuart Scientific SMP1 apparatus and are uncorrected. The IR spectra were measured using an FTIR-8400 s-Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer-Shimadzu. The NMR spectra were determined on Advance Bruker NMR spectrometer at 400 MHz with TMS as internal standard. The ESI mass spectra were measured by a Finnigan LCQ spectrometer.

Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole di-esters 3ad

Diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate 1 (15 mmol) and the appropriate surfactant azide 2ad (20 mmol) were heated on a water bath for 3 min. The reaction mixture was cooled and then ether was added to precipitate the product. The solid was filtered and washed with hexane.

Characterization of diethyl 1-decyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarboxylate (3a)

It was obtained in 98% (hygroscopic). IR (KBr): 1742 (C=O), 1572 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.22–1.27 (m, 14H, 7 × CH 2), 1.40 (t, 6H, J = 8 Hz, 2 × OCH2CH 3), 1.77–1.82 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 3.37 (dd, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 4.23–4.30 (q, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, OCH 2CH3), 4.41–4.47 (m, 3H, OCH 2CH3), 4.70 (t, 1H, J = 8 Hz, NCH 2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 13.95 (CH3), 14.12, 14.22 (OCH2 CH3), 22.84, 26.54, 28.30, 28.79, 29.24, 29.63, 29.84, 29.99, 30.54, 32.71, 33.65 (CH2), 50.97 (NCH2), 61.80, 62.87 (2 × OCH2CH3), 129.46, 140.14, 151.98, 158.35, 160.87 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. for C18H31N3O4: C, 61.17; H, 8.84; N, 11.89. Found: C, 61.29; H, 8.79; N, 11.80. ESI MS (m/z): 354.23 [M+H]+.

Characterization of diethyl 1-dodecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarboxylate (3b)

It was obtained in 97% (hygroscopic). IR (KBr): 1745 (C=O), 1566 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.20–1.26 (m, 18H, 9 × CH 2), 1.43 (t, 6H, J = 8 Hz, 2 × OCH2CH 3), 1.75–1.80 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 3.44 (dd, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 4.20–4.28 (q, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, OCH 2CH3), 4.35–4.42 (m, 3H, OCH 2CH3), 4.71 (t, 1H, J = 8 Hz, NCH 2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 13.90 (CH3), 14.19, 14.28 (OCH2 CH3), 22.80, 26.59, 26.77, 28.46, 28.80, 29.07, 29.26, 29.80, 29.92, 30.22, 30.64, 32.83, 33.83 (CH2), 50.85 (NCH2), 61.73, 62.65 (2 × OCH2CH3), 129.44, 140.28, 151.83, 158.40, 160.95 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. for C20H35N3O4: C, 62.96; H, 9.25; N, 11.01. Found: C, 62.88; H, 9.32; N, 11.12. ESI MS (m/z): 382.26 [M+H]+.

Characterization of diethyl 1-tetradecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarboxylate (3c)

It was obtained in 96% (hygroscopic). IR (KBr): 1738 (C=O), 1580 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.26–1.33 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.41 (t, 6H, J = 8 Hz, 2 × OCH2CH 3), 1.81–1.91 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 3.41 (dd, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 4.27–4.32 (q, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, OCH 2CH3), 4.40–4.48 (m, 3H, OCH 2CH3), 4.58 (t, 1H, J = 8 Hz, NCH 2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 13.95 (CH3), 14.12, 14.22 (OCH2 CH3), 22.73, 26.39, 28.24, 28.38, 28.99, 29.40, 29.50, 29.53, 29.60, 29.64, 29.68, 30.29, 31.97, 32.91, 33.90 (CH2), 50.55 (NCH2), 61.78, 62.98 (2 × OCH2CH3), 129.97, 140.22, 151.79, 158.72, 160.33 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C22H39N3O4: C, 64.52; H, 9.60; N, 10.26; Found: C, 64.71; H, 9.52; N, 10.18. ESI MS (m/z): 410.29 [M+H]+.

Characterization of diethyl 1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarboxylate (3d)

It was obtained in 95% (hygroscopic). IR (KBr): 1740 (C=O), 1575 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.23–1.34 (m, 26H, 13 × CH 2), 1.49 (t, 6H, J = 8 Hz, 2 × OCH2CH 3), 1.84–1.90 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 3.50 (dd, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 4.23–4.30 (q, 1H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, OCH 2CH3), 4.37–4.45 (m, 3H, OCH 2CH3), 4.52 (t, 1H, J = 8 Hz, NCH 2). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 13.87 (CH3), 14.23, 14.28 (OCH2 CH3), 22.70, 26.34, 28.29, 28.54, 28.90, 29.45, 29.59, 29.87, 29.99, 30.11, 30.43, 30.64, 31.66, 32.45, 33.56, 33.87 (CH2), 50.47 (NCH2), 61.86, 62.73 (2 × OCH2CH3), 129.92, 140.85, 152.33, 158.80, 161.24 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C24H43N3O4: C, 65.87; H, 9.90; N, 9.60. Found: C, 65.94; H, 9.82; N, 9.72. ESI MS (m/z): 438.32 [M+H]+.

Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole di-acid hydrazides 4ad

A mixture of compound 3ad (10 mmol) and hydrazine hydrate (20 mmol) in ethanol (50 mL) was stirred for 5–15 min at rt. Ethanol was removed under reduced pressure, and the product formed was recrystallized from ethanol to give the titled compounds 4ad.

Characterization of 1-decyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbohydrazide (4a)

It was obtained in 91% as colorless crystals, mp: 125–126 °C. IR (KBr): 3273–3367 (NH, NH2), 1690 (C=O), 1565 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.23 (bs, 14H, 7 × CH 2), 1.78–1.82 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.73–4.78 (m, 6H, NCH 2, 2 × NH 2), 10.42 (s, 1H, NH), 11.84 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.90 (CH3), 22.06, 25.76, 28.36, 28.62, 28.82, 29.80, 31.23 (CH2), 50.32 (NCH2), 129.42, 137.82, 155.46, 159.22 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C14H27N7O2: C, 51.67; H, 8.36; N, 30.13. Found: C, 51.81; H, 8.32; N, 30.21. ESI MS (m/z): 326.22 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 1-dodecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbohydrazide (4b)

It was obtained in 90% as colorless crystals, mp: 115–116 °C. IR (KBr): 3254–3365 (NH, NH2), 1694 (C=O), 1579 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.23 (bs, 18H, 9 × CH 2), 1.78–1.81 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.74–4.79 (m, 2H, NCH 2, 2 × NH 2), 10.42 (s, 1H, NH), 11.83 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.91 (CH3), 22.06, 25.77, 28.37, 28.67, 28.82, 28.89, 28.96, 28.97, 29.81, 31.25 (CH2), 50.32 (NCH2), 129.43, 137.82, 155.46, 159.23 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C16H31N7O2: C, 54.37; H, 8.84; N, 27.74. Found: C, 54.41; H, 8.74; N, 27.80. ESI MS (m/z): 354.25 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 1-tetradecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbohydrazide (4c)

It was obtained in 88% as colorless crystals, mp: 110–111 °C. IR (KBr): 3267–3356 (NH, NH2), 1686 (C=O), 1569 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.89 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.26–1.35 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.88–1.96 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.19 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH 2), 4.93 (dd, 2H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 7.28 (s, 1H, NH), 12.06 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.06 (CH3), 22.64, 26.47, 29.02, 29.31, 29.41, 29.49, 29.57, 29.61, 29.64, 30.52, 31.88 (CH2), 51.80 (NCH2), 129.36, 137.31, 156.73, 161.87 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C18H35N7O2: C, 56.67; H, 9.25; N, 25.70. Found: C, 56.80; H, 9.30; N, 25.77. ESI MS (m/z): 382.28 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbohydrazide (4d)

It was obtained in 85% as colorless crystals, mp: 103–104 °C. IR (KBr): 3246–3361 (NH, NH2), 1697 (C=O), 1575 (C=C) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.25–1.37 (m, 26H, 13 × CH 2), 1.86–1.92 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.21 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH 2), 4.90 (dd, 2H, J = 4 Hz, 8 Hz, NCH 2), 7.24 (s, 1H, NH), 12.11 (s, 1H, NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.09 (CH3), 22.69, 26.73, 29.23, 29.57, 29.70, 29.98, 30.34, 30.46, 30.59, 30.72, 31.64, 31.93 (CH2), 51.76 (NCH2), 129.56, 137.49, 156.97, 159.55 (C=C, C=O). Anal. Calcd. For C20H39N7O2: C, 58.65; H, 9.60; N, 23.94. Found: C, 58.74; H, 9.66; N, 23.89. ESI MS (m/z): 410.31 [M+H]+.

Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole bis-acid thiosemicarbazides 5ad

A mixture of compound 4ad (10 mmol) and phenyl isothiocyanate (20 mmol) in ethanol (50 ml) was refluxed for 6 h. The solution was cooled and a white solid appeared. The obtained precipitate was filtered and recrystallized from ethanol to give the titled compounds 5ad.

Characterization of 2,2′-(1-decyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbonyl)bis(N-phenylhydrazine-carbothioamide) (5a)

It was obtained in 87% as colorless crystals, mp: 187–188 °C. IR (KBr): 3237–3377 (NH), 1694 (C=O), 1570 (C=C), 1298 (C=S) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.85 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.24–1.27 (m, 14H, 7 × CH 2), 1.83–1.86 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.60 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 7.12–7.17 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.27–7.33 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.69–7.74 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 9.64, 9.67 (2bs, 2H, 2 × NHPh), 9.90, 10.08 (2 s, 2H, 2 × NHCS), 11.23, 11.55 (2bs, 2H, 2 × CONH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.86 (CH3), 21.99, 25.72, 28.29, 28.57, 28.77, 28.84, 29.52, 31.18 (CH2), 49.73 (NCH2), 124.04, 124.77, 125.17, 126.06, 128.06, 131.14, 138.66, 138.90 (Ar–C), 157.30, 160.52, 180.18, 181.07 (C=O, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C28H37N9O2S2: C, 56.45; H, 6.26; N, 21.16. Found: C, 56.36; H, 6.18; N, 21.05. ESI MS (m/z): 596.25 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 2,2′-(1-dodecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbonyl)bis(N-phenylhydrazine-carbothioamide (5b)

It was obtained in 86% as colorless crystals, mp: 180–181 °C. IR (KBr): 3248–3360 (NH), 1698 (C=O), 1581 (C=C), 1295 (C=S) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.24–1.27 (m, 18H, 9 × CH 2), 1.81–1.87 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.62 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 7.10–7.19 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.23–7.30 (m, 6H, Ar–H),) 7.68–7.73 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 9.68, 9.88 (2bs, 2H, 2 × NHPh), 9.67, 9.72 (2 s, 2H, 2 × NHCS), 11.20, 11.51 (2bs, 2H, 2 × CONH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.84 (CH3), 21.96, 25.70, 28.34, 28.63, 28.75, 28.88, 29.57, 29.77, 30.09, 31.28 (CH2), 49.79 (NCH2), 124.09, 124.80, 125.21, 126.11, 128.05, 131.19, 138.72, 138.95 (Ar–C), 157.36, 160.56, 180.29, 181.38 (C=O, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C30H41N9O2S2: C, 57.76; H, 6.62; N, 20.21. Found: C, 57.66; H, 6.55; N, 20.16. ESI MS (m/z): 624.28 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 2,2′-(1-tetradecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbonyl)bis(N-phenylhydrazine-carbothioamide) (5c)

It was obtained in 82% as colorless crystals, mp: 173–174 °C. IR (KBr): 3255–3380 (NH), 1686 (C=O), 1580 (C=C), 1291 (C=S) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.24–1.27 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.83–1.88 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.63 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 7.10–7.19 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.23–7.28 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.69–7.75 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 9.62, 9.65 (2bs, 2H, 2 × NHPh), 9.93, 10.00 (2 s, 2H, 2 × NHCS), 11.28, 11.50 (2bs, 2H, 2 × CONH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.86 (CH3), 21.99, 25.72, 28.29, 28.57, 28.77, 28.84, 29.52, 31.18 (CH2), 49.73 (NCH2), 124.04, 124.77, 125.17, 126.06, 128.06, 131.14, 138.66, 138.90 (Ar–C), 157.30, 160.52, 180.18, 181.07 (C=O, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C32H45N9O2S2: C, 58.96; H, 6.96; N, 19.34. Found: C, 58.85; H, 6.85; N, 19.41. ESI MS (m/z): 652.31 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 2,2′-(1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-dicarbonyl)bis(N-phenylhydrazine-carbothioamide) (5d)

It was obtained in 85% as colorless crystals, mp: 160–161 °C. IR (KBr): 3252–3351 (NH), 1690 (C=O), 1574 (C=C), 1289 (C=S) cm−1. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.20–1.29 (m, 26H, 13 × CH 2), 1.86–1.89 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.65 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 7.14–7.19 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 7.25–7.30 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 7.70–7.75 (m, 2H, Ar–H), 9.60, 9.64 (2bs, 2H, 2 × NHPh), 9.88, 10.05 (2 s, 2H, 2 × NHCS), 11.24, 11.52 (2bs, 2H, 2 × CONH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 13.80 (CH3), 21.95, 25.75, 28.33, 28.59, 28.68, 28.79, 28.99, 29.44, 29.59, 31.24 (CH2), 49.64 (NCH2), 124.11, 124.80, 125.34, 126.12, 128.56, 131.49, 138.95, 139.06 (Ar–C), 157.43, 160.69, 180.76, 181.27 (C=O, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C34H49N9O2S2: C, 60.06; H, 7.26; N, 18.54. Found: C, 60.13; H, 7.32; N, 18.47. ESI MS (m/z): 680.34 [M+H]+.

Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole bis-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 6ad

A mixture of compound 5ad (10 mmol) and 10% aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (200 mL) was refluxed for 6 h. The mixture was then cooled to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was acidified by the addition of hydrochloric acid. The resulting solid was collected by filtration, washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol to give compound 6ad.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-decyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione) (6a)

It was obtained in 80% as colorless crystals, mp: 220–221 °C. IR (KBr): 3345 (NH), 1615 (C=N), 1570 (C=C), 1295 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.87–0.91 (m, 3H, CH 3), 1.27–1.43 (m, 14H, 7 × CH 2), 1.80–1.85 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.22–4.26 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 7.10–7.46 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.08 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.10 (CH3), 15.21, 22.63, 26.22, 26.37, 28.85, 29.24, 29.31, 29.44, 29.93 (CH2), 31.83 (NCH2), 118.14, 121.72, 125.35, 127.78, 128.42, 128.97, 129.66, 137.31, 141.95, 188.58 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C28H33N9S2: C, 60.08; H, 5.94; N, 22.52. Found: C, 60.19; H, 5.85; N, 22.44. ESI MS (m/z): 560.23 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-dodecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione) (6b)

It was obtained in 84% as colorless crystals, mp: 229–230 °C. IR (KBr): 3332 (NH), 1608 (C=N), 1578 (C=C), 1291 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.88 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.28–1.45 (m, 18H, 9 × CH 2), 1.81–1.88 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.20–4.28 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 7.05–7.40 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.15 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.08 (CH3), 15.25, 22.78, 22.90, 26.31, 26.56, 28.80, 29.05, 29.29, 29.58, 29.73, 29.99, 30.23 (CH2), 31.97 (NCH2), 118.19, 121.46, 125.74, 127.69, 128.39, 128.87, 129.74, 137.47, 141.47, 188.70 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C30H37N9S2: C, 61.30; H, 6.34; N, 21.45. Found: C, 61.18; H, 6.43; N, 21.40. ESI MS (m/z): 588.26 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-tetradecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione) (6c)

It was obtained in 83% as colorless crystals, mp: 238–239 °C. IR (KBr): 3365 (NH), 1611 (C=N), 1572 (C=C), 1297 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.87 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.26–1.40 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.80–1.86 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.22–4.29 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 7.09–7.43 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.12 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.14 (CH3), 15.26, 22.70, 22.96, 26.36, 26.54, 28.85, 29.09, 29.41, 29.72, 29.79, 29.94, 30.08, 30.38 (CH2), 31.88 (NCH2), 118.21, 121.51, 125.79, 127.72, 128.43, 128.84, 129.71, 137.45, 141.49, 188.59 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C32H41N9S2: C, 62.41; H, 6.71; N, 20.47. Found: C, 62.29; H, 6.65; N, 20.43. ESI MS (m/z): 616.29 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-phenyl-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-3-thione) (6d)

It was obtained in 85% as colorless crystals, mp: 250–251 °C. IR (KBr): 3368 (NH), 1610 (C=N), 1578 (C=C), 1299 cm−1 (C=S). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δH = 0.86 (t, 3H, J = 4 Hz, CH 3), 1.23–1.28 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.34–1.44 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2), 1.84–1.88 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.16 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 7.02–7.49 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 10.60 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 14.63 (CH3), 22.77, 26.47, 28.00, 29.18, 29.37, 29.59, 29.69 (CH2), 31.96 (NCH2), 118.03, 123.22, 129.85, 130.64, 140.49, 187.84 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C34H45N9S2: C, 63.42; H, 7.04; N, 19.58. Found: C, 63.31; H, 7.11; N, 19.66. ESI MS (m/z): 644.32 [M+H]+.

Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole bis-4-amino-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones 7ad

Step 1:

Carbon disulfide (30 mmol) was added dropwise to a stirred solution of compound 4ad (10 mmol) dissolved in absolute ethanol (50 mL) containing potassium hydroxide (30 mmol) at 0 °C. The stirring was continued for 16 h at ambient temperature, and then diluted with diethyl ether. The obtained precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with diethyl ether, dried to afford the corresponding potassium dithiocarbazinate salt and used without further purification as it was moisture sensitive.

Step 2:

Hydrazine hydrate (30 mmol) was added to a solution of the potassium salt (10 mmol) dissolved in water (10 mL). The reaction mixture was then heated under reflux for 6 h. After cooling, the reaction mixture was acidified with HCl. The solid thus formed was collected by filtration, washed with water and recrystallized from ethanol to yield the desired aminotriazole 7ad.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-decyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-amino-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-thione) (7a)

It was obtained in 80% as colorless crystals, mp: 217–218 °C. IR (KBr): 3295–3350 (NH), 1611 (C=N), 1584 (C=C), 1288 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.90–0.93 (m, 3H, CH 3), 1.25–1.41 (m, 14H, 7 × CH 2), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.20–4.27 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 5.22 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH2), 7.13–7.41 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.21 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.15 (CH3), 15.27, 22.74, 26.34, 26.45, 28.80, 29.29, 29.33, 29.48, 30.01 (CH2), 31.88 (NCH2), 129.73, 137.38, 142.03, 187.63 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C16H27N11S2: C, 43.92; H, 6.22; N, 35.21. Found: C, 43.86; H, 6.10; N, 35.08. ESI MS (m/z): 438.18 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-dodecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-amino-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-thione) (7b)

It was obtained in 84% as colorless crystals, mp: 234–235 °C. IR (KBr): 3278–3340 (NH), 1608 (C=N), 1578 (C=C), 1291 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.86–0.90 (m, 3H, CH 3), 1.25–1.39 (m, 18H, 9 × CH 2), 1.83–1.89 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.21–4.30 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 5.25 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH2), 7.09–7.41 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.25 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.11 (CH3), 15.21, 22.72, 22.98, 26.38, 26.62, 28.84, 29.01, 29.34, 29.53, 29.70, 29.94, 30.31 (CH2), 31.91 (NCH2), 129.78, 137.52, 141.43, 187.65 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C30H37N9S2: C, 61.30; H, 6.34; N, 21.40. Found: C, 61.36; H, 6.25; N, 21.34. ESI MS (m/z): 588.26 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-tetradecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-amino-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-thione) (7c)

It was obtained in 83% as colorless crystals, mp: 251–252 °C. IR (KBr): 3285–3340 (NH), 1620 (C=N), 1578 (C=C), 1290 (C=S) cm−1. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.91 (t, 3H, J = 8 Hz, CH 3), 1.28-1.39 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.84–1.89 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.24–4.31 (m, 2H, NCH 2), 5.19 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH2), 7.11–7.41 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.28 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δC = 14.12 (CH3), 15.23, 22.74, 22.90, 26.39, 26.59, 28.82, 29.04, 29.38, 29.75, 29.84, 29.91, 30.21, 30.32 (CH2), 31.85 (NCH2), 129.75, 137.49, 141.46, 187.60 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C32H41N9S2: C, 62.41; H, 6.71; N, 20.47. Found: C, 62.36; H, 6.65; N, 20.39. ESI MS (m/z): 616.29 [M+H]+.

Characterization of 5,5′-(1-hexadecyl-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4,5-diyl)bis(4-amino-2,4-dihydro-1,2,4-triazole-thione) (7d)

It was obtained in 85% as colorless crystals, mp: 275–276 °C. IR (KBr): 3275–3350 (NH), 1615 (C=N), 1580 (C=C), 1296 cm−1 (C=S). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δH = 0.85–0.91 (m, 3H, CH 3), 1.25–1.29 (m, 22H, 11 × CH 2), 1.36–1.43 (m, 4H, 2 × CH2), 1.85–1.90 (m, 2H, NCH2CH 2), 4.19 (bs, 2H, NCH 2), 5.27 (bs, 4H, 2 × NH2), 7.08–7.43 (m, 10H, Ar–H), 9.31 (bs, 2H, 2 × NH). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δC = 14.63 (CH3), 15.30, 22.70, 22.92, 26.35, 26.62, 28.77, 29.01, 29.42, 29.70, 29.82, 29.95, 30.17, 30.28 (CH2), 31.90 (NCH2), 129.70, 137.44, 141.51, 187.68 (Ar–C, C=N, C=S). Anal. Calcd. For C34H45N9S2: C, 63.42; H, 7.04; N, 19.58. Found: C, 63.31; H, 7.11; N, 19.69. ESI MS (m/z): 616.29 [M+H]+.

Antimicrobial activity assay

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was conducted according to the microdilution method [36], as previously described. The newly designed compounds were evaluated for their antimicrobial activity against six pathogenic bacterial strains [Gram-positive: Bacillus cereus (ATTC 10876), Enterococcus faecalis (ATTC 29212) and Staphylococcus aureus (ATTC 25923), Gram-negative: Proteus mirabilis (ATTC 35659), Escherichia coli (ATTC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATTC 27853), and two fungal strains (Candida albicans (ATTC 50193) and Aspergillus brasiliensis (ATTC 16404)].

MIC tests were undertaken in 96 flat bottom microtiter plates (TPP, Switzerland). An inoculum size of 1 × 105 CFU mL−1 of each microorganism was inoculated in each microtiter plate well. Test wells were filled with 100 μL nutrient broth and a series of dilutions of each examined compound dissolved in DMSO (1–500 mg mL−1). Positive control wells consisted of the individual microorganism under investigation inoculated in 100 μL nutrient broth while negative control wells contained DMSO at the same concentration present in the test wells.

Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, with shaking. To evaluate microbial growth, optical densities were measured at 600 nm (OD600) using a Microplate Reader (Palo Alto, CA, USA). The MIC value was designated as the least concentration at which more than 80% of the microbial growth is inhibited. MIC assessment was carried out in triplicates and repeated three times for each microorganism.

In-silico molecular docking studies

The compounds synthesized in the present investigation were subjected for molecular docking studies using Auto Dock (version 4.0) with Lamarckian genetic algorithm [38]. We have considered using Lamarckian genetic algorithm over Monte Carlo simulated annealing and traditional genetic algorithm. The previous method can handle ligands with more degrees of freedom than the Monte Carlo method used in earlier versions of AUTODOCK. The Lamarckian genetic algorithm is the most efficient, reliable, and successful. AutoDock 4.0, combines energy evaluation through grids of affinity potential employing various search algorithms to find the suitable binding position for a ligand on a given protein. The ligands were drawn in ChemSketch. Energy of molecule was minimized using by PRODRG server [39]. In the present study, the binding site was selected based on the amino acid residues, which are involved in binding with glucosamine-6-phosphate of GlcN-6-P synthase as obtained from Protein Data Bank ( with the PDB ID 2VF5 which would be considered as the best accurate active region as it is solved by experimental crystallographic data [40]. It was then edited by removing the heteroatoms, adding the C-terminal oxygen, rotating all the torsions during docking. Steepest Descent methods were applied for minimization by considering the default parameters. Polar hydrogen’s were added to ligands using the hydrogen’s module in Autodock tool and thereafter assigning Kollman united atom partial charges. Docking to ligands was carried out with standard docking protocol on the basis a population size of 150 randomly placed individuals; a maximum number of 2.5*107 energy evaluations, a mutation rate of 0.02, a crossover rate of 0.80 and an elitism value of 1. Fifteen independent docking runs were carried out for ligands. The grid was centered at the region including all the 12 amino acid residues (Ala602, Val399, Ala400, Gly301, Thr302, Ser303, Cys300, Gln348, Ser349, Thr352, Ser347 and Lys603). The grid box size was set at 70, 64, and 56 Å̊ for x, y and z respectively, and the grid center was set to 30.59, 15.822 and 3.497 for x, y and z respectively, which covered all the 12 amino acid residues in the considered active pocket. The spacing between grid points was 0.375 angstroms. The docking results were interpreted according to the.pdb file. Using the rmsd table created in the.dlg file, we have determined the co-ordinates of the minimum energy run. UCSF chimera was used to visualize the coordinate of the docked protein along with targeted compounds within 6.5 Ǻ region.


A series of novel 1,2,3-triazole-1,2,4-triazole hybrids carrying variant lipophilic side chain were synthesized and screened for antibacterial and antifungal activity. Finally, the synthesized compounds were docked inside the active site of Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase, the potential target for antimicrobial and antifungal
agents and the results of such studies were reported. In-silico studies revealed that all the synthesized compounds 3a, c, d, 4ad, 5ac, 6ad, 7ad have relatively less binding energy as compared to the standard drug and may be considered as a good inhibitors of GlcN-6-P. The binding energy toward the target protein ranged from − 5.72 to − 10.49 kJ mol−1. The high-ranking binding energy of the synthesized compound, 6d was − 10.49 kcal/mL. Consistent with the in silico studies, all synthesized compounds demonstrated fair to excellent antimicrobial activities relative to standard potent antibacterial and antifungal agents, with remarkably enhanced antimicrobial activities associated with the 1,2,4-triazole derivatives tailoring elongated chain substitution at the 1,2,3-triazole N-1 position.


  1. 1.

    Vijesh AM, Isloor AM, Shetty P, Sundershan S, Fun HK (2013) New pyrazole derivatives containing 1,2,4-triazoles and benzoxazoles as potent antimicrobial and analgesic agents. Eur J Med Chem 62:410–415

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ruddarraju RR, Murugulla ACh, Kotla R, Tirumalasetty MChB, Wudayagiri R, Donthabakthuni Sh, Maroju R, Baburao K, Parasa LS (2016) Design, synthesis, anticancer, antimicrobial activities and molecular docking studies of theophylline containing acetylenes and theophylline containing 1,2,3-triazoles with variant nucleoside derivatives. Eur J Med Chem 123:379–396

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krishna KM, Inturi B, Pujar GV, Purohit MN, Vijaykumar GS (2014) Design, synthesis and 3D-QSAR studies of new diphenylamine containing 1,2,4-triazoles as potential antitubercular agents. Eur J Med Chem 84:516–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Plech T, Kaprón B, Łuszczki JJ, Paneth A, Siwek A, Kołaczkowski M, Zołnierek M, Nowak G (2014) Studies on the anticonvulsant activity of 4-alkyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-thiones and their effect on GABAergic system. Eur J Med Chem 86:690–699

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Abuo-Rahma GAA, Abdel-Aziz M, Beshr EAM, Ali TFS (2014) 1,2,4-Triazole/oxime hybrids as new strategy for nitric oxide donors: synthesis, anti-inflammatory, ulceroginicity and antiproliferative activities. Eur J Med Chem 71:185–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    The Merck Index & Co. Inc (2001) Whitehouse Station. NJ, USA, p 320

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    The Merck Index & Co. Inc (2001) Whitehouse Station. NJ, USA, p 3737

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kant R, Singh V, Nath G, Awasthi SK (2016) Agarwal A Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of ciprofloxacin tethered bis-1,2,3-triazole conjugates as potent antibacterial agents. Eur J Med Chem 124:218–228

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yadav P, Lal K, Kumar A, Guru SK, Jaglan S, Bhushan Sh (2017) Green synthesis and anticancer potential of chalcone linked-1,2,3-triazoles. Eur J Med Chem 126:944–953

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Darandale SN, Mulla NA, Pansare DN, Sangshetti JN, Shinde DB (2013) A novel amalgamation of 1,2,3-triazoles, piperidines and thieno pyridine rings and evaluation of their antifungal activity. Eur J Med Chem 65:527–532

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Głowacka IE, Balzarini J, Wróblewski AE (2013) The synthesis, antiviral, cytostatic and cytotoxic evaluation of a new series of acyclonucleotide analogues with a 1,2,3-triazole linker. Eur J Med Chem 70:703–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Devender N, Gunjan S, Chhabra S, Singh K, Pasam VR, Shukla SK, Sharma A, Jaiswal S, Singh SK, Kumar Y, Lal J, Trivedi AK, Tripathi R, Tripathi RP (2016) Identification of ß-amino alcohol grafted 1,4,5-trisubstituted-1,2,3-triazoles as potent antimalarial agents. Eur J Med Chem 109:187–198

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kumar D, Khare BG, Kidwai S, Tyagi AK, Singh R, Rawat DS (2014) Synthesis of novel 1,2,3-triazole derivatives of isoniazid and their in vitro and in vivo antimycobacterial activity evaluation. Eur J Med Chem 81:301–313

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Belmessieri D, Gozlan Ch, Duclos MCh, Molinier V, Aubry JM, Dumitrescu O, Lina G, Redl A, Duguet N, Lemaire M (2017) Synthesis, surfactant properties and antimicrobial activities of methyl glycopyranoside ethers. Eur J Med Chem 128:98–106

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Goyal Ch, Ahuja M, Sharma SK (2011) Preparation and evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of gugulipid-loaded proniosomal gel. Acta Pol Pharm Drug Res 68:147–150

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Liang JJ, Wei JC, Lee YL, Hsu SH, Lin JJ, Lin YL (2014) Surfactant-modified nanoclay exhibits an antiviral activity with high potency and broad spectrum. J Virol 88:4218–4228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Badawi AM, Mohamed MAS, Mohamed MZ, Khowdairy MM (2007) Surface and antitumor activity of some novel metal-based cationic surfactants. J Can Res Ther 3:198–206

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Letelier ME, Rodríguez-Rojas C, Sánchez-Jofré S, Aracena-Parks P (2011) Surfactant and antioxidant properties of an extract from Chenopodium quinoa Willd seed coats. J Cereal Sci 53:239–243

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Willson DF (2015) Aerosolized surfactants, anti-Inflammatory drugs, and analgesics. Respir Care 60:774–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rezki N, Al-Yahyawi AM, Bardaweel SK, Al-Blewi FF, Aouad MR (2015) Synthesis of novel 2,5-disubstituted-1,3,4-thiadiazoles clubbed 1,2,4-triazole, 1,3,4-thiadiazole, 1,3,4-oxadiazole and/or schiff base as potential antimicrobial and antiproliferative agents. Molecules 20:16048–16067

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Aouad MR, Messali M, Rezki N, Ali AASh, Lesimple A (2015) Synthesis and characterization of some novel 1,2,4-triazoles, 1,3,4-thiadiazoles and Schiff bases incorporating imidazole moiety as potential antimicrobial agents. Acta pharm 65:117–132

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rezki N (2016) A Green ultrasound synthesis, characterization and antibacterial evaluation of 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazoles tethering bioactive benzothiazole nucleus. Molecules 21:505–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Aouad MR (2016) Synthesis and antimicrobial screening of novel thioglycosides and acyclonucleoside analogs carrying 1,2,3-triazole and 1,3,4-oxadiazole moieties. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 35:1–15

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Aouad MR, Al-Saedi AMH, Ali AA, Rezki N, Messali M (2016) Preparation of novel 3-fluorophenyl triazolothiadiazoles and of triazolothiadiazines. Org Prep Proced Int 48:355–370

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vijesh AM, Isloor AM, Telkar S, Arulmoli T, Fun HK (2013) Molecular docking studies of some new imidazole derivatives for antimicrobial properties. Arab J Chem 6:197–204

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chmara H, Andruszkiewicz R, Borowski E (1984) Inactivation of glucosamine-6-phosphatesynthetase from Salmonella typhimurium LT2 SL 1027 by N-beta-fumarylcarboxyamido-l-2,3-diamino-propionic acid. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 120:865–872

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Marshall NJ, Andruszkiewicz R, Gupta S, Milewski S, Payne JW (2003) Structure activity relationships for a series of peptidomimetic antimicrobial prodrugs containing glutamine analogues. J Antimicrob Chemother 51:821–831

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Borowski E (2000) Novel approaches in the rational design of antifungal agents of low toxicity. Farmaco 55:206–208

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Krishna BG, Sarojini BK, Darshanraj CG (2014) Synthesis, characterization, molecular docking and evaluation of antibacterial, antiproliferative, and anti-inflammatory properties of new pyridinyl substituted triazole derivatives. Der Pharma Chemica 6:345–361

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Rajasekaran A, Sivakumar KK, Sureshkumar K, Manjushree M (2017) Design, synthesis, characterisation and in vitro antimicrobial activity of some hybridized triazole scaffolds. Future J Pharm Sci 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Satyendra RV, Vishnumurthy KA, Vagdevi HM, Rajesh KP, Manjunatha H, Shruthi A (2012) In vitro antimicrobial and molecular docking of dichloro substituted benzoxazole derivatives. Med Chem Res 21:4193–4199

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pradeepa K, Krishna V, Harish BG, Venkatesh Kumar S R, Kumar GK (2012) Antibacterial activity of leaf extract of Delonix elata and molecular docking studies of luteolin. J Biochem Tech 3:S193–S197

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Krishnaswamy G, Desai NR, Naika RNH, Mahadevan KM, Satyendra RV, Kumar DBA (2016) Design, synthesis, antibacterial, antioxidant activity and molecular docking studies of 6-hydroxybenzofuran derivatives. J Chem Pharm Res 8:19–28

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ebrahimipoura SY, Sheikhshoaiea I, Castrob J, Dušekc M, Tohidiana Z, Eignerc V, Khaleghi M (2015) Synthesis, spectral characterization, structure studies, molecular docking and antimicrobial evaluation of new dioxidouranium(VI) complexes incorporating tetradentate N2O2 Schiff base ligands. RSC Adv 5:95104–95117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) (2000) Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents by agar dilution. Clin Microbiol Infect 6:509–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (2000) Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically approved standard M7-A5, 5th edn. Wayne, NCCLS

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Milewski S (2002) Glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase—the multi-facets enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1597:173–192

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew KR, Olson AJ (1998) Automated docking using a lamarckian genetic algorithm and empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–1662

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Schüttelkopf AW, Aalten DM (2004) PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Cryst D60:1355–1363

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mouilleron S, Badet-Denisot MA, Golinelli-Pimpaneau B (2008) Ordering of C-terminal loop and glutaminase domains of glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase promotes sugar ring opening and formation of the ammonia channel. J Mol Biol 377(4):1174–1185

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

MRA, NR, and MM gave the concepts of this work. NR, FFA and MMM, carried out the experimental work and cooperated in the preparation of the manuscript. SKB and AN performed the biological part. MRA, NR and FFA collected data, interpreted the results and prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed the results, wrote and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohamed Reda Aouad or Nadjet Rezki.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aouad, M.R., Mayaba, M.M., Naqvi, A. et al. Design, synthesis, in silico and in vitro antimicrobial screenings of novel 1,2,4-triazoles carrying 1,2,3-triazole scaffold with lipophilic side chain tether. Chemistry Central Journal 11, 117 (2017).

Download citation


  • Click chemistry
  • 1,2,3-triazole-1,2,4-triazole hybrids
  • Lipophilic side chain
  • Antimicrobial activity
  • Molecular docking