Skip to main content

DrugScoreFP: profiling protein-ligand interactions using fingerprint simplicity paired with knowledge-based potential fields

Scoring functions used in structure-based drug design are often inefficient in reliably placing near-native geometries on the first scoring rank. Furthermore, there is no means to incorporate protein-specific information which additionally captures interaction details of different experimentally observed binding modes with the target protein under consideration.

Here, we present a vector-based extension of the DrugScoreCSD formalism [1], called DrugScore Fingerprints (DrugScoreFP), to rescore docking results. The original DrugScore of a docked inhibitor is partitioned into per-atom scores resulting in a 1D vector. Simple distance metrics allow the determination of similarities between fingerprints of docked compounds and reference fingerprints derived from crystal structures. Furthermore, DrugScoreFP allows the generation of family-based fingerprint profiles similarly implemented in SIFT [2, 3][4]. Therefore, a weighted consensus vector is derived from a given set of co-crystallized inhibitors with the target protein. Thus, DrugScoreFP binding profiles capture similarities and dissimilarities with respect to drug targets for which a large amount of structural data is available.

We have applied DrugScoreFP to handle the following tasks in structure-based drug design:

The recognition of near-native docking-poses was improved compared to DrugScoreCSD and SIFT using the Wang dataset [5]. DrugScoreFP places geometries <0.5Å rmsd on the first scoring rank in 94% of the cases. This indicates an improvement compared to the original DrugScoreCSD of 6% and SIFT of 18%. Furthermore, cross-validation studies on different consensus fingerprints were performed with respect to a trypsin dataset consisting of 61 co-crystallized ligand structures. In a leave-one-out experiment, DrugScoreFP showed better recognition rates of crystal structures than docked compounds in 75% of the cases. As a final step, GOLD was used to dock 1800 compounds from the National Cancer Institute Diversity Set (NCI; into trypsin and HIV-1 protease. DrugScoreFP shows superior ROC-AUCs of up to 99% compared to GOLD-Score (72%) and DrugScoreCSD (85%), using a fingerprint profile constructed from 61 and 22 co-crystallized ligands as query for the trypsin and the HIV-1 protease screen, respectively.

Finally, the results prove that DrugScoreFP can be used as a powerful filter, identifying similar binding profiles. It could also be shown that DrugScoreFP is stable with respect to cross-validations. It reliably discriminates near-native poses from widely spread decoys and retrieves active compounds diluted in a large dataset almost perfectly.


  1. 1.

    Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G: J Med Chem. 2005, 48 (20): 6296-303. 10.1021/jm050436v.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Deng Z, Chuaqui C, Singh J: J Med Chem. 2004, 47 (2): 337-44. 10.1021/jm030331x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chuaqui C, Deng Z, Singh J: J Med Chem. 2005, 48 (1): 121-33. 10.1021/jm049312t.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Mpamhanga C.P., et al: J Chem Inf Model. 2006, 46 (2): 686-98. 10.1021/ci050420d.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S: J Med Chem. 2003, 46 (12): 2287-303. 10.1021/jm0203783.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Pfeffer.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeffer, P., Neudert, G. & Klebe, G. DrugScoreFP: profiling protein-ligand interactions using fingerprint simplicity paired with knowledge-based potential fields. Chemistry Central Journal 2, S16 (2008).

Download citation


  • Dock
  • Recognition Rate
  • Institute Diversity
  • Binding Profile
  • Interaction Detail