Table 4 Comparison between the proposed and reported MLC methods for determination of drugs under study
Method | Proposed method | Reported method [14] | Reported method [18] | Reported method [19] | Reported method [20] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Technique | MLC, C18, HPLC–UV | Bonded b-CD column, HPLC–UV | HPLC–UV Hyper ODS2, Column C18 | HPTLC | Micellar electrokinetic capillary electrophoretic |
Organic modifier | Totally free | Tetraethylammonium acetate | Mixture of 45 mL Acetonitrile and 55 mL of water | Acetone‒ethanol‒ethyl acetate‒2% sodium dodecyl sulfate‒glacial acetic acid (3:2:4:1:0.5, V/V) | 0.02 M monobasic sodium phosphate Adjusted to pH 3.0 (with 40% phosphoric acid) and acetonitrile) |
Analytes similarity | AMP, SLB CFP, CFX | AMP, CFP, SLB | CFX, SLB | CFP, SLB | AMP, SLB |
Runtime | 6 min | 28.3 min | 3.6 | 5 min | 20 min |
GAPI assessment |
|
|
|
|
|
AGREE |
|
|
|
|
|
