Table 3 Comparison of our fabricated samples performance with various recorded adsorbents for the removal of CV dye
Fabricated samples | Qm (mg/g) | Câ—¦ (mg/L) | pH | Dose (g/L) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTPS | 4.4 | 40 | 6.5 | 10 | This work |
UTPS/ISC2 | 4.6 | 40 | 6.5 | 10 | This work |
UTPS/ISC2/SICNCs | 7.6 | 40 | 6.5 | 10 | This work |
Waste coffee husk | 1.38 | 12 | 3 | 1.5 | [15] |
Magnetic charcoal | 10 | 40 | 8 | 1 | [56] |
Nanomagnetic iron oxide | 12.5 | 5 | 7 | 0.5 | [57] |
Chitosan magnetic microspheres | 28.2 | - | 7 | 0.1 | [58] |
Activated carbon from lemon | 23 | 10 | 9 | 1.25 | [59] |