Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison between the proposed spectrofluorometric method and the reported spectrophotometric one relying on the % recoveries of aceclofenac in pure form

From: Acriflavine: an efficient green fluorescent probe for sensitive analysis of aceclofenac in pharmaceutical formulations

Proposed methodd

Reported method [16]

Conc. taken (µg/mL)

Conc. found (µg/mL)

% recoverya ± SD

% recoverya ± SD

1.0

0.99

99.40 ± 1.12

97.70 ± 1.35

3.0

2.96

98.60 ± 0.78

98.320 ± 1.79

10.0

9.95

99.50 ± 1.22

101.02 ± 1.31

14.0

14.22

101.57 ± 1.54

99.63 ± 1.43

16.0

16.05

100.31 ± 0.72

 

18.0

17.91

99.50 ± 0.77

 

20.0

19.92

99.59 ± 0.34

 

\({{\bar{\text{X}}}}\) ± SD = 99.78 ± 0.93

99.17 ± 1.47

t-test = 0.86 (2.26)b

F-value = 2.5 (8.94)c

  1. aMean recovery of three separate determinations
  2. bTabulated t-value at (P = 0.05) [27]
  3. cTabulated F-value at (P = 0.05) [27]
  4. dAll results of the proposed method were conducted after adjusting excitation wavelength at 451 nm
Back to article page

BMC Chemistry

ISSN: 2661-801X

Contact us