Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the proposed method with other methods

From: A simple strategy based on fibers coated with surfactant-functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes to improve the properties of solid-phase microextraction of phenols in aqueous solution

Method

Detection system

LOD (ng/mL)

RSD (%)

Liner range (ng/mL)

References

SPMEa

HPLC–UV

0.25–3.67

4.25–12.95

10.8–1585

[6]

SPMEb

GC-MSMS

0.26–2.63

2.08–9.02

1–1000

[21]

MWCNTs-DDM/PDMS SBSEc

HPLC–UV

0.14–1.76

6.2–11.6

1–1000

[38]

PDMS-SBSEd

GC–MS

0.1–0.4

6–27

1–15

[16]

SB-µ-SPEe

GC–MS

0.24

4.50

1–600

[46]

SUPRAS-microextractionf

HPLC–DAD

1–4

4.70–7.27

10–150

[47]

MWCNTs/NaDC SPME

HPLC–UV

0.15–0.30

5.7–11.9

1–100

Present study

  1. aMWCNTs-COOH fiber SPME
  2. bCarboxylated solid carbon spheres SPME
  3. cAmino modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polydimethylsiloxane coated stir bar sorptive extraction
  4. dPolydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) stir bar sorptive extraction
  5. eStir bar-supported micro-solid-phase extraction
  6. fSupramolecular solvent based microextraction