Skip to main content

Table 1 Crystal data and structure refinement parameters for compounds 1–3

From: Synthesis, structure and toxicity evaluation of ethanolamine nitro/chloronitrobenzoates: a combined experimental and theoretical study

Compound

1

2

3a

Empirical formula

C9H11ClN2O5

C9H13ClN2O6

C9H12N2O5

Formula weight

262.65

280.66

228.21

Temperature (K)

293 (2)

293 (2)

293 (2)

Wavelength (Å)

1.54184

1.54184

0.71073

Crystal system

monoclinic

triclinic

monoclinic

Space group

P21 /c

P-1

P21 /c

Z

4

2

4

Unit cell dimensions

 a (Å)

8.402 (2)

7.019 (1)

6.211 (2)

 b (Å)

6.334 (1)

9.512 (2)

8.651 (3)

 c (Å)

22.023 (4)

9.740 (2)

19.594 (5)

 α (°)

90

79.19 (3)

90

 β (°)

100.72 (3)

88.58 (3)

91.27 (2)

 γ (°)

90

78.42 (3)

90

 V3)

1151.6 (4)

625.7 (2)

1052.6 (5)

 D calc (g cm−3)

1.515

1.490

1.440

 μ (mm−1)

3.099

2.950

0.119

 F (000)

544

292

480

Crystal size (mm)

0.22 × 0.14 × 0.07

0.15 × 0.12 × 0.08

0.35 × 0.4 × 0.6

θ range for data collection (°)

4.09–70.07

4.62–70.01

2.08–27.06

Limiting indices

− 10 ≤ h ≤ 1

− 8 ≤ h ≤ 8

0 ≤ h ≤ 7

− 7 ≤ k ≤ 0

− 4 ≤ k ≤ 11

0 ≤ k ≤ 11

− 26 ≤ l ≤ 26

− 11 ≤ l ≤ 11

− 25 ≤ l ≤ 25

Reflections collected/unique

2336/2192

2370/2370

2501/2294

Reflections with [I > 2σ(I)]

2010

2282

1761

Parameters

156

165

193

Goodness-of-fit on F2

1.007

1.003

1.001

R 1, wR 2 [I > 2σ(I)]

0.0384, 0.1128

0.0415, 0.1175

0.0371, 0.1023

R 1, wR 2 (all data)

0.0414, 0.1163

0.0424, 0.1187

0.0540, 0.11068

Largest difference in peak and hole (e Å−3)

0.330/− 0.311

0.385/− 0.315

0.265/− 0.212

  1. aCrystallographic data of compound 3 [21] is presented here for comparison with compounds 1 and 2