Skip to main content

Table 3 The QSAR models used by respondents

From: Use and perceived benefits and barriers of QSAR models for REACH: findings from a questionnaire to stakeholders

 

Sample endpoints mentioned from actual applications of QSAR

Stake-holder group

Physico-Chemical Properties

Human Toxicity

Ecotoxicity

Environmental Properties

ACACON

Boiling point Vapour pressure

Mutagenicity/ genotoxicity (including Ames, micronucleus, mouse SCE, mouse COMET) Carcinogenicity Teratogenicity Acute toxicity (mammals) Skin irritation, corrosion, or sensitization Eye irritation Endocrine disruption (estrogenbinding, antiadrogenic activity)Reprotox hERG inhibition

Acute aquatic invertebrate toxicity (Daphnia) Acute fish toxicity (fathead minnow, trout) Algae Toxicity Terrestrial Ecotoxicology (bees) Tetrahymena

Bioaccumulation/ BCF Half-life in water/soil Ready biodegradability Abiotic hydrolysis/degradation Koc/soil adsorption

 

Water solubility Partition coefficients (LogP/LogD)

   

(8 of 13 subjects replied)

    

REGUL

Partition coefficients (Pow)

Carcinogenicity

Aquatic toxicity

Bioaccumulation/ BCF

(6 of 12 subjects replied)

 

Reproductive toxicity

Daphnia reproduction

Degradation (DT50)

  

Mutagenicity/ genotoxicity (also addressing metabolites)

All ecotox part of EPI Suite (Aquatic toxicity acute andchronic algae fish and daphnia)

 
  

Teratogenesis

  
  

Acute toxicity Endocrine disruptions (estrogen and androgen binding)

  
  

Skin sensitization NOEC

  

INDUS

Partition coefficients (LogP)

Mutagenicity Genotoxicity Carcinogenicity Teratogenicity

Acute aquatic invertebrate toxicity (Daphnia) (LC50 daphnia magna as supporting information) Fish toxicity