Biosynthesis approach of zinc oxide nanoparticles for aqueous phosphorous removal: physicochemical properties and antibacterial activities

In this study, phosphorus (PO43–-P) is removed from water samples using zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs). These nanoparticles are produced easily, quickly, and sustainably using Onion extracts (Allium cepa) at an average crystallite size of 8.13 nm using the Debye–Scherrer equation in the hexagonal wurtzite phase. The characterization and investigation of bio-synthesis ZnO NPs were carried out. With an initial concentration of 250 mg/L of P, the effects of the adsorbent dose, pH, contact time, and temperature were examined. At pH = 3 and T = 300 K, ZnO NPs achieved the optimum sorption capacity of 84 mg/g, which was superior to many other adsorbents. The isothermal study was found to fit the Langmuir model at a monolayer capacity of 89.8 mg/g, and the kinetic study was found to follow the pseudo-second-order model. The adsorption process was verified to be endothermic and spontaneous by thermodynamic characteristics. As a result of their low cost as an adsorbent and their high metal absorption, ZnO NPs were found to be the most promising sorbent in this investigation and have the potential to be used as effective sorbents for the removal of P from aqueous solutions. The antimicrobial activity results showed that ZnO NPs concentration had greater antibacterial activity than conventional Cefotaxime, which was utilized as a positive control in the inhibitory zone. However, no inhibitory zone was visible in the controlled wells that had been supplemented with onion extract and DMSO.


Introduction
In their natural state, phosphorus is an important nutrient in aquatic habitats (P).It frequently results in eutrophication, a threat to the ecosystem's health, and creates immediate and long-term aesthetic and environmental problems in lakes, reservoirs, bays, coastal areas, and other small bodies of water.This element is often present in small amounts as phosphate ions (PO 4  3-).Man-made substances like detergent, fertilizer, pesticides, additives, home, and industrial sewage, and inadequately treated wastewater are to blame for high phosphate levels [1][2][3][4].This excessive rate of (PO 4 3-) can damage the natural food chain by promoting the growth of algae through eutrophication and decreasing the amount of dissolved oxygen.Aquatic species may be killed as a result, and the quality of water reservoirs may also suffer [5].Sewage dumping into waters has grown since 1970.P was thus designated as a significant contaminant due to its large contribution to the eutrophication and diversion of the receiving waters.
The EPA recommends that a stream's total P concentration not exceed 0.05 mg/L [6].Therefore, before waste effluents are released into the environment, it is extremely important to improve phosphate removal [7,8].The need to create more effective solutions for the treatment of wastewater that contains PO 4 3-ions arises from the fact that these ions are challenging to remove using existing wastewater treatment methods.
The main phosphate removal methods used today include chemical precipitation using ferric or aluminum salts [9,10], ion exchange [11], biological removal [12], and adsorption [13,14] are the principal treatment strategies used to remove phosphate.These technologies, however, typically are unable to costeffectively and fully comply with the increasingly strict requirements on the release of phosphate.Further, the world's supply of cheap phosphorous, a valuable nonrenewable natural resource, is predicted to run out by 2050 [15].Investigating workable solutions to capture, recover, and reuse the phosphorus in wastewater is therefore essential.Adsorption appears to be appealing for removing of phosphate due to its ease of use, low cost, ability to regenerate the adsorbents employed for numerous purposes (via desorption), flexibility in design and operation, and cost-effective phosphate recovery [16].
The biological synthesis of NPs can be carried out using a vast array of resources such as plants and plant products, algae, fungi, yeast, bacteria, and viruses.Nanoparticles produced by plants are more stable and the rate of synthesis is faster than in the case of microorganisms.Furthermore, plants are eco-friendly [17], sustainable [18], free of chemical contamination, less expensive [19], and can be used for mass production [20].Furthermore presence of various compounds, such as proteins, alkaloids, flavonoids, reducing sugars, polyphenols, etc., in the biomaterials act as reducing and capping agents for the synthesis of NPs from its metal salt precursors [21].Phytochemical profile of the onion extract is mainly derived from the carbohydrate, lipid, protein, and polyphenols moieties, also quercetin and quercetin 4'-O-βglucopyranoside were involved in the formation of metal oxide nanoparticles [22].
Here, a green method for producing ZnO nanoparticles using onion extract has been established.Then, physicochemical characterization was carried out using various techniques to assist the nanoscale biosynthesis of ZnO NPs.It investigated how well ZnO NPs achieved unprecedented removal of phosphorus from wastewater through adsorption, and evaluate of reusing and regeneration efficiency of prepared nanomaterials.Furthermore, the antibacterial properties of ZnO NPs were investigated against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
A schematic representation of green synthesis of ZnO NPs and the goal of the study (Fig. 1).

Materials and reagents
Except as noted in work, all the chemicals and materials used in this work were obtained in their original states.Sigma-Aldrich provided zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O) with a purity of 98% and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH 2 PO 4 ) with a purity of 99%.By mixing 4.0 g of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) extra pure (LOBA CHEMIE) with 600 mL of deionized water, 1 Liter was created.A 37% quantity of hydrochloric acid (HCl) was purchased from Merck.Cefotaxime [C 16 H 17 N 5 O 7 S 2 ], 455.46 g/mol, serving as an antimicrobial standard, was supplied by EVA Pharma, Egypt.

Green synthesis of ZnO NPs
A small amount of the red onion plant about 100 g was thoroughly cleaned with distilled water before being shade-dried at room temperature and steeped in 50% aqueous ethanol (50:50 v/v) in a glass tank.After 60 h, the solid material is eliminated by being filtered twice with Whatman filters to eliminate any remaining solids.Heat 100 mL of onion extract using a hotplate magnetic stirrer to 60 °C before adding 60 mM of aqueous zinc sulfate dropwise.Magnetic stirring was used to thoroughly combine the solution.Immediately after addition, a brown precipitate was seen.The pH was then adjusted to 10.5 by adding a few drops of 25% ammonia solution and keeping the temperature at 60 °C while constantly stirring.The precipitate is clearly distributed throughout the solution, allowed to react for one hour and stand for 24 h.This precipitate was periodically rinsed with distilled water, centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min to remove the ethanol, and then dried for 6 h at 60 °C in the oven.The dry precipitate was annealed for two hours at varied temperatures between 200 and 400 °C in an open furnace.The best process for producing extremely crystalline ZnO nanoparticles was annealing at 400 °C.

Instrumentation
The production of ZnO NPs was measured using a digital balance model 220 (Denver Instrument Co., USA), a heater magnetic stirrer 1L (0-1600 RPM), and an electric muffle furnace (ST-1200 °C-666, Germany).Using an X-ray diffractometer (PW 1710 from Philips), electron microscopy (QUANTAFEG 250 with an EDX attachment), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM28 JEOL JEM-100C XII), the size of the ZnO NPs was determined.Using a PerkinElmer (Lambda 750 UV/Vis/ NIR) Spectrophotometer, the samples' UV-Vis absorption spectra measurements were taken in the wavelength range of 200-800 nm.Using a Thermo Fisher Scientific device, the FT-IR spectra were captured in the wavenumber range 4000-400 cm -1 (Nicolet iS10 FT-IR Spectrometer).On the Hitachi, photoluminescence measurements (PL) were carried out (F-7100 Fluorescence Spectrophotometer).Using a micro-Raman Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRam spectrometer, Raman analysis was carried out (HR800).

Adsorption studies
KH 2 PO 4 was dissolved in distilled water to produce a solution containing P (1000 mg/L).Dilution was used to create the working concentrations that were required.The pH of the solution was then adjusted using 0.1 M NaOH and HCl solution to the required value.For the batch sorption studies, the pH of the solution was increased from 3 to 9, and the contact time and temperature were set at 0-1440 min and 20-40 °C, respectively.The studies were conducted using a solution with an initial P ions concentration of 5-400 mg/L and a nanoparticle dose of 0.015 − 0.045 g/L.ZnO NPs were used in the adsorption studies in 100 mL stoppered conical flasks with 20 mL of P ions solutions.The pH was then corrected, and the flasks were then put into a shaker at a 120 rpm speed.The following filtration to remove the adsorbent, the concentration of the remaining P ions was determined spectrophotometrically at 400 nm using the vanado molybdous phosphoric acid technique.

Point of zero charge (pHpzc) and effect of initial pH adsorption
The pH drift method was used to determine the pH of the point of zero charges (pH pzc ), or the pH below which a nanoparticle's entire surface is positively charged.To do this, 20 mL of 0.1 mol/L NaCl solutions were created with initial pH ranges of 2-10, 0.1 N HCl, or 0.1 N NaOH, and 0.025 g of ZnO NPs.The samples were then agitated for 24 h, and the pH stabilized for 48 h at room temperature.The mixture's final pH was measured, and the final pH (Y-axis) was plotted against the initial pH to demonstrate their differences (X-axis).This curve's intersection with the initial pH = final pH line is known as pH zpc [23].The studies were conducted in the pH range of 3.0-9.0while maintaining the following constants: P ions concentration of 250 mg/L, adsorbent dose of 0.04 g, contact period of 24 h, and temperature of 27 °C.The pH of the solution was adjusted to the required level using 0.1 M HNO 3 or 0.1 M NaOH.

Effect of adsorbent dosage
By varying the amounts of the adsorbents in the test solution from 0.015 to 0.045 g/L while maintaining the initial P ions concentration at 250 mg/L, the temperature at 27 °C, pH 3.0, and equilibrium time of 24 h, the adsorption of P ions onto ZnO NPs was examined.

Isothermal study and effect phosphorous concentration
Aqueous solutions of P ions in the concentration range of 50-400 mg/L were generated to thoroughly grasp the nature of the interaction and to characterize how the adsorbate interacts with adsorbents.Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin-Radushkevich (D-R) isothermal models were used to assess the equilibrium data for the adsorption of P ions onto produced ZnO NPs [24], as the following equations: where V is the volume of the P (mL), q e is the amount of P that has been adsorbed (in mg/g), C 0 is the starting concentration of P (in mg/L), C e is the equilibrium concentration of P (in mg/L), and m is the mass of ZnO NPs (mg).
where q L is the monolayer adsorption capacity of ZnO NPs (mg/g), K L is Langmuir energy of adsorption constant (L/mg), R L is the sensitive equilibrium parameter and C max is the highest initial P concentration in the solution (mg/L).K F is the Freundlich adsorption capacity of ZnO NPs (mg/g), and n is the Freundlich constant, indicating the adsorption intensity.
where A T is the binding constant (L/mg), which was related to the maximum binding energy.The B T is the Temkin adsorption constant (KJ/mol) related to the (1) (6) q e = B T ln A T + B T ln C e (7) b T = RT /B T sorption heat, R is the gas constant (8.314J/mol K), T is the absolute temperature at 298 K and b T is the adsorption process constant.
where q m is the D-R adsorption capacity of ZnO NPs (mg/g), β is the coefficient related to the mean free energy, ε is Polanyi potential and E D is adsorption energy per molecule of the P adsorbate when it is transferred to the surface of the solid ZnO NPs from infinity in the solution (kJ/mol).

Kinetic and thermodynamic studies
By adding 0.04 g of the nano sorbent to a 100 mL conical flask containing 20 mL of the phosphorous solution (250 mg/L) at a constant temperature of 300 K, P is removed by ZnO NPs as a function of contact time.For various contact times, the P ion residual concentration was calculated (from 0 min to 24 h).The following Eqs.(11)(12)(13)(14) were used to assess the adsorption data toward phosphorous following the kinetic models: Pseudo-first-order model [25]: Pseudo-second-order model [26]: where q t represents the amount of P contaminant adsorbed by ZnO NPs (mg/g) at a predetermined time interval t, K 1, and K 2 are rated constant of pseudo-firstorder and pseudo-second-order adsorption process respectively, (min -1 ).
Elovich model [27]: where β is the constant related to surface coverage and the activation energy for chemisorption (g/mg), and α is the initial sorption rate constant (mg/g min).
Weber's and Moris's intraparticle diffusion model [28]: where K int is the intraparticle rate constant (mg/g min 1/2 ), and C is the value that gives information about the boundary thickness.Equations 15-17 can be used to determine the parameters Gibbs free energy change (ΔG) (kJ/mol), enthalpy (8) ln q e = ln q m − βε 2 (9) change (ΔH) (kJ/mol), and entropy change (ΔS) (kJ/mol K) to assess the thermodynamic behavior of phosphorus adsorption on ZnO NPs [29]: ∆G determines the free energy change (J/mol), R is the gas constant (8.314J/mol K), T is the absolute temperature (K), and K c is the thermodynamic equilibrium constant, ∆H determines the enthalpy change (J/mol), ∆S represents the entropy change (J/mol K) and C ads acts the concentration (mg/L) of the adsorbed P.

Recovery of phosphorous and reuse adsorbent experiments
The dilute sodium hydroxide is used to elute the nanoadsorbents loaded with phosphorus ions, and the pH is subsequently adjusted with deionized water washings.The regeneration experiment was then carried out for four cycles, dried at 70 °C to constant weight, and reloaded with P ions to examine the lifespan of the nanoadsorbents and removal percentage.After filtering the suspension from the adsorption test, the evaluated phosphorus desorption from the sorbent was collected in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask.100 mL of a phosphatefree solution was added to each flask.After that, the flask was shaken for 24 h while the pH was maintained within a wide range.In a manner comparable to previously reported, the suspension solutions underwent filtering and phosphorus desorbed analysis.The amount of phosphate in the solution following the desorption experiment was used to calculate the amount of desorbed phosphorus.

Antimicrobial activity
In this study, we use the good diffusion method to examine the antibacterial properties of green-produced ZnO NPs against different microorganisms.Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 14028 and Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 were the bacteria employed for the antibacterial activity, whereas Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 were the Gram-positive bacteria.The Central lab provided bacterial strains.Egypt's Water Resources and Irrigation Ministry is in charge of the New Valley governorate.
Cefotaxime, a common antibacterial drug, was utilized as a positive control, while DMSO was used as the solvent.50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL of ZnO NPs were produced at four different concentrations.Gram-positive (15 and Gram-negative bacteria were treated with four different concentrations in DMSO in a 50 μL.The tests were then conducted using Cefotaxime 150 μg/mL as an antimicrobial standard (positive control), with an Onion extract in an aqueous liquid and DMSO as the negative control.The experiment was run in triplicates, and each plate's zone of inhibition was quantified.Before the experiment, pure cultures were sub-cultured on nutrient broth, incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and then diluted into the same broth to a concentration of about 10 -6 cfu/mL.Poured nutrient agar over each culture diluted to 1 mL and transferred to the plate.Sterilized pipette tips were then used to create the wells.Transferred from (50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL) of ZnO NPs, a 50 μL was put into wells.The plates were then allowed to stand for diffusion before incubating for 24 h at 37 °C.
The Debye-Scherrer method was also used to estimate the average particle size of ZnO NPs (Eq.18).The average particle size is determined to be 8.13 nm, which is compatible with the findings of SEM and TEM [32,33].The structural and microstructural parameters were estimated, including lattice parameters, lattice spacing, respective reflections, and particle sizes [34].Equations 18-22 were used to get the unit cell volume for examples and the lattice parameters [34]: D determines the average crystallite size, K is constant (0.94), λ is the wavelength (Cu-K α = 1.54171Å), Ɵ is the Bragg angle, and β: The full width at half maxima (FWHM) of a diffracted peak.
The calculated values of a and c, shown in Table 1, accord well with the reported values (a = 3.246, c = 5.219, JCPDS card number 0208-079-01).

FT-IR analysis
The FT-IR spectra of onion extract and biosynthesized ZnO NPs are shown in Fig. 3.The bands at 3407, 2927, 1636, 1450, and 1055 cm −1 show the onion extract's complex phytochemical composition, which is predominantly produced by the carbohydrate, protein, lipid, and polyphenol [35].The peak at 3407 cm −1 is due to the alcohol and phenolic groups being stretched O − H, proteins (20)   being stretched N − H, and water being adsorbed [36,37].The peak at 2927 cm −1 is attributed to asymmetric stretching of C − H. Carbonyl vibrations in the onion extract may have contributed to the creation of ZnO NPs and are responsible for the characteristic peak at 1636 cm −1 [4,38,39].
For instance, the bands at 1585 cm −1 belonging to the C = O group changed to a lower frequency area, while the broad peak at 3319 cm −1 related to O-H or N-H had previously been detected in plant extract grew broad [40].The bands at 1055 cm −1 were associated with the carboxylic acid functional groups and the C-O stretching of ester.The similarity of the ZnO NPs and onion extract spectra indicates the presence of bioactive organic species as reducing agents, which also shows some shifts.The majority of the signals for various functional groups, as shown in Fig. 3, confirm that these reducing groups are also responsible for forming and stabilizing preparation nanoparticles [3,41].The generation of pure ZnO NPs was confirmed by the new sharp and weak peak at 536 cm −1 , which follows ZnO stretching vibration [42,43].

Optical characteristics
Figure 4a displays the ZnO NPs distributed in water's UV-Vis absorbance.The distinctive peak for hexagonal wurtzite ZnO is at 374 nm, and this is quite similar to how ZnO NPs are made by Parthenium leaf extract [44].Because shallow levels have developed, the absorption peak has a red shift of roughly 9 nm relative to that of bulk ZnO (365 nm) [45,46].Additionally, no additional peaks in the spectrum were seen outside the typical peak, proving the great purity of ZnO NPs made from onion extract.The electronic band gap of semiconductors can be calculated using Eq.23 of the Tauc relationship [44].
where α is the absorption coefficient (α = 2.303 A/t; A is the absorbance and t is the cuvette thickness), h is the Planck's constant, ν is the photon frequency, n value is 2 for direct band gap semiconductor and E g is the optical band gap.
By plotting (αhѵ) 2 vs the photon energy hѵ using the information from the absorption spectra, as shown in Fig. 4b, it is possible to determine the optical energy gap, or E g , of the ZnO NPs.It demonstrates that in a specific area, the resultant plotting provides tangent to the linear section of the curves.ZnO NPs produced through biosynthesis have an estimated band gap of 3.32 eV [47,48].Figure 4c displays the results of the photoluminescence spectrum (PL) analysis to look into the crystal flaws.The sample found in the blue-green zone, clearly showed the deep-level emissions.The presence of inherent crystal flaws in the ZnO NPs was blamed for the blue-green emission bands seen at 428 nm (excitonic transitions) [34].

Raman analysis
ZnO nanoparticles having a wurtzite structure that is hexagonal fit into the P63mc space group [49].Only the optical phonons near the Brillouin zone's point Γ, participate in first-order Raman scattering for the ideal ZnO crystal.Equation 24 lists the optical modes that should be present in a wurtzite ZnO based on the group theory.
where, both A 1 and E 1 modes are polar branches, split into a transverse optical mode (TO), and a longitudinal optical mode (LO).E 2 mode consists of low E 2 low and high E 2 high frequency phonons modes.E 2 low is associated with the vibration of the oxygen atom and E 2 high is related to heavy Zn sublattices [50].The first-order Raman-active modes are A 1 , E 1 , and E 2 .Additionally, the B 1 modes, also known as silent modes are typically inactive in Raman spectra.Figure 5 shows the Raman spectra for the ZnO NPs, which had typical peaks in the 400-700 cm −1 range.One of the distinctive modes of the hexagonal wurtzite phase of zinc oxide, the high-frequency branch of the nonpolar optical phonon E 2 high of zinc oxide matched to the high-intensity peak seen at 446 cm −1 .The high-intensity peak's correlation with the E 2 high optical mode also emphasized the remarkable structural integrity and optical properties of the greenly synthesized ZnO NPs made from onion extract [51].The additional peaks at 613 and 628 cm −1 do not match up with ZnO normal modes.These peaks represent other vibrational modes linked to faults [52].(23) (αhν) n = A hν − E g (24)

Morphology analysis (SEM, TEM, and EDX analyses)
The exterior morphology of ZnO NPs is depicted in Fig. 6a and b as having a spherical form and high aggregation.The particles were found to be aggregated, and this kind of accumulation resulted from the produced nanoparticles' high surface energy [53].The biomimetically synthesized ZnO NPs were produced from onion extract, and SEM pictures showed that they are smaller than previously described (  by the TEM investigation of the bio-synthesized NPs in Fig. 6c and d. Figure 6e shows that the biosynthesized ZnO-NPs were polycrystalline in nature.The smallest particles in the sample ranged 1 to 16 nm, with an average diameter of 8.89 nm, as can be seen from particle size distributions Fig. 6f.The observed size is in good agreement with the XRD result.When the pH is raised throughout the synthesis process, thin, spherical  To determine the elemental composition of the produced ZnO NPs, an energy-dispersive X-ray diffractive (EDX) analysis was conducted.The sample made using the above technique has only pure ZnO phases, according to SEM-EDS examination of the ZnO NPs.As shown in Fig. 7, the EDX validates the presence of zinc and oxygen signals in ZnO NPs.This analysis revealed the distinct peaks for both Zn and O. Additionally, measurement of the components revealed that the sample included 71.33% Zn and 15.13% O by weight, demonstrating that the created ZnO NPs are in their purest form [43].While the other minor constituents present in the ZnO NPs were due to the componants of the onion plant extract [56].

Phosphorus wastewater remediation via ZnO NPs (batch adsorption examination) Zero point charge and effect of initial pH adsorption
Figure 8 depicts the curve for calculating of the pH zpc of ZnO NPs.This diagram makes it clear that the pH range between 4 and 5 goes from acidic to basic, whereas the pH range between 6 and 10 goes from more basic to less basic.The pH zpc of the nanoparticles is 7 because the pH curve of the nanoparticles crosses the straight line at this point.where pK 1 = 2.15, pK 2 = 7.20 and pK 3 = 12.33, respectively [74].
The pH of the solution, which affects the adsorption behavior of phosphorous and is connected to the effect of the adsorbent's pH point of zero charges, therefore determines the protonation/dissociation state of the phosphate (25) hydroxyl groups [75].The pH rose due to the surface hydroxyls being deprotonated, the surface charge switching from positive to negative, and the quick decrease in the electrostatic contact between P ions and the sorbent surface.Figure 9a illustrates phosphorus removal rate from aqueous solutions onto ZnO NPs based on pH variations (3.0-9.0 pH) at the beginning phosphorus concentration of 250 mg/L, the absorbent dose of 0.04 g/L, contact time of 24 h, and temperature of 27 °C.The pH of the solution, which influences the adsorbent's surface charge, degree of ionization, and speciation, was found to be a significant determinant of the removal of P ions from water by producing adsorbent ZnO NPs [76].It was shown that when the pH of the solution rose, the NP's  The increased phosphorus removal rate at lower pH levels may be caused by the development of more positive active sites on the nano adsorbents surface, which aids the sorption for generating an electrostatic connection between P ions and the sorbent surface [77].The electrostatic force and the interplay of ion exchange may explain the removal of P ions from water [78].

Effect of initial phosphorous concentration
Figure 9b shows the effect of phosphorus content on the produced adsorbent's removal capability at pH 3.0, 40 mg of adsorbent dose, 27 °C, and 24 h.The adsorption capabilities nearly remained constant after exceeding 250 mg/L.This may have been caused by insufficient active sites that might hold more P atoms.ZnO NPs have an 84 mg/g maximal adsorption capacity for P ions.

Effect of contact time
Adsorption studies were conducted with an initial phosphorus content of 250 mg/L, an adsorbent dosage of 40 mg/L, a solution pH of 3.0, and room temperature during a range of contact periods from 0 to 1440 min (27 °C).Results from Fig. 9c showed that as contact time was prolonged from 10 to 240 min, phosphorous adsorption capacity increased quickly, rising from 39.5 mg/g to 84 mg/g (equivalent to a phosphorous removal rate rise from 31.6 to 66.4%).The adsorption process in this experimental setup slowed after 240 min and steadied at 270 min.The adsorption capacity and phosphorus  removal efficiency peaked at 240 min of contact time, reaching maximum values of 84 mg/g and 66.4%, respectively.The ZnO NPs surface initially had many new binding sites available, which caused a rapid increase in adsorption.Over time, the adsorption process became slower and more stable due to the saturation of active adsorption sites on the ZnO NPs surface [79].

Effect of dosage
Different adsorbent doses (0.015 − 0.045 g/L) were employed to examine the impact of ZnO NP dosage on the adsorption of P ions.As can be shown, while utilizing a nano-adsorbent dosage of 0.04 g with 250 mg/L P solution, the maximum adsorption of P ions was 67.5%.According to Fig. 9d, there is an early increase in the P ions removal capacity with the mass ratio of solid/liquid, followed by a prolonged increase at the quantity of 0.04 g.This may be explained by the fact that when the nanoadsorbent dose rose, the effective adsorption active sites on the nanomaterial surface rapidly increased, causing a rapid uptake of P ions from the sorption solution.The absorption efficiency of P ions will nonetheless achieve equilibrium as the nanomaterial dose keeps rising.You could think of it as a saturation point.Any increase in the solid dose after this saturation point just causes the adsorbed layer at the adsorbent surface to become thicker [80][81][82][83].

Kinetic study
Kinetics informs us of the adsorption process' regulating processes and aids in creating useful mathematical models that capture the interactions [23].The ratelimiting phase of phosphorous adsorption by ZnO NPs was examined by fitting the experimental data to four kinetic models, including pseudo-first and secondorder, Elovich, and intraparticle diffusion kinetic models.The slope of a graph of log (q e − q t ) vs time t is used to calculate the value of K 1 , as shown in Fig. 10a.According to Table 3, the correlation coefficient value for the three ZnO NPs was 0.7058, indicating that this model is unable to explain the experimental data.ZnO NPs experimentally determined adsorption capacity of 84 mg/g, derived from Fig. 10b, which was comparable to the calculated value of 84.3 mg/g obtained using the pseudo-secondorder method.The results shown in Table 3 demonstrate that the pseudo-second-order kinetic model adequately described the experimental data, as indicated by the correlation coefficient (R 2 = 0.9999).The good fit of P sorption kinetics to the pseudo-second-order model suggests that the rate-limiting phase in the sorption of P ions onto ZnO NPs is likely governed by chemisorption involving valence forces through the sharing or exchange of   11 ZSFB-composite fiber 4.18 [98] 12 Hollow-magnetic -Fe 3 O 4 11.95 [99] 13 NaCl modified zeolite 6.67 [100] 14 ZnO particles 53.4 [14] 15 ZnO nanoparticle 89.8This Study electrons between the NPs surface and P ions [80].Less linearity is evident in the regression coefficient R 2 for the Elovich and intraparticle diffusion models, which were determined to be 0.8277 and 0.5544, respectively, in Fig. 10c and d.It can be concluded that the models proposed by Elovich and intraparticle diffusion are not applicable for P ions removal by ZnO NPs based on the R 2 value obtained by the second-order kinetic model.

Adsorption isotherms
At 27 °C and pH 3.0, an equilibrium analysis was conducted to assess the experimental data to calculate the adsorption capacity of the adsorbents.Table 4 provides a list of the calculated and experimental results.A straight line is produced by plotting the value of C e / q e vs C e along with the related Langmuir constants for removing P ions by ZnO NPs, as illustrated in Fig. 11a.The outcomes showed that the adsorption process fit the Langmuir model well, with R 2 values of 0.9979 suggesting that phosphorous ions would be adsorbed homogeneously by all adsorption active sites with identical affinity.
The elimination of phosphorus was determined to have a favorable separation factor, or R L value, of 0.075 using the Langmuir model.Figure 11b depicts the Freundlich adsorption isotherm model's log q e vs. log C e plot.The 1/n values in this study are between 0 and 1, indicating a typical process of phosphorus adsorption onto ZnO NPs adsorbent.Moreover, as shown in Table 4, the n value, which ranges between 1 and 10, implies a good adsorption process.The Freundlich isotherm was not the best fit for the sorption process of phosphorus onto the surface of the ZnO NPs, as evidenced by the R 2 values of 0.8968.Phosphorous ions are thus removed from the surface of ZnO NPs with certain heterogeneity inactive spots.The heat of sorption corresponds to a physical process because the predicted Temkin parameters A and B values from Fig. 11c and stated in Table 4 were determined to be 0.96 L/g and 16.78 J/mol, respectively.Additionally, the b T values of 0.148 kJ/mol demonstrated that the removal was accomplished through a physisorption mechanism [84].The plot of ln q e versus ε 2 in Fig. 11d   the plot displays β (mol 2 /J 2 ), and the intercept displays q m (mg/g).Each sorbate molecule's free energy (E) of sorption when moving from infinity in the solution to the surface of the solid was found to be 0.56 kJ/mol.This finding confirms that the physical sorption process of P onto ZnO NPs adsorbents, as indicated in Table 4, occurs.
The Langmuir isotherm model has the highest R 2 values, according to a comparison of the values in Table 4.The Langmuir isotherm was therefore the one that fit sorption the best.The Temkin heat of adsorption constant (B) values and b T for nano-adsorbents, along with the free energy (E) of sorption per molecule of the sorbate in the Dubinin-Radushkevich model, supported the conclusion that the removal happened via physisorption process.

Thermodynamics study
The effects of temperature on phosphate adsorption onto ZnO NPs are depicted in Fig. 12 with temperatures ranging from 296 to 313 K, an initial phosphorus concentration of 250 mg/L, pH 3, and a fixed adsorbent dosage of 40 mg/L.The gradual rise in phosphorus adsorption capacity with temperature was detected, indicating that phosphorus adsorption onto ZnO NPs was an endothermic reaction, as was previously seen with Zhen Luo [14].The possibility of the adsorption process and the spontaneous character of the adsorption are both confirmed by the negative values of ΔG (ΔG < 0) in Table 5 [85].Additionally, the adsorption process appears more advantageous at higher temperatures, as seen by the decrease in the negative value of ΔG with an increase in temperature [16,86,87].When ΔH has a positive value, the adsorption process is endothermic.Finally, the positive values of ΔS show unmistakably that during the phosphorus adsorption onto the ZnO NPs, the randomness at the solid-solution interface increased [88,89].This may be caused by the phosphorus's increased mobility [90].

A comparative study with other adsorbents
This work focused on the high efficiency of ZnO NPs, which surpassed many earlier studies employing numerous nano adsorbents for removing phosphorous from aqueous solutions.ZnO NPs have not been widely employed as an effective adsorbent in removing phosphorous from aqueous solutions (Table 6).Compared to other nano-adsorbents, the produced ZnO NPs are thought to have an exceptional capacity to adsorb P ions and remove them from an aqueous solution.Therefore, it may be concluded that a larger percentage of ZnO NP adsorbents are sorbent at high P concentrations.As is evident, ZnO NPs used in this study outperform many other adsorbents mentioned in the literature.High specific surface area ZnO NPs were credited with the produced nanomaterials' superior adsorption capacity.The outcome showed that the sorption process required a considerably lower dosage of ZnO NPs.

Recovery of phosphorus and reusability of ZnO NPs
After regeneration, the effectiveness of using ZnO NPs repeatedly for P removal was looked at and displayed in Fig. 13.According to the findings (Fig. 13a), cycles 1-4 had average removal efficiencies of 38, 32, and 28%, respectively.The loss of functional groups, insufficient desorption, washing under alkaline conditions, or complex compounds that may have occluded the interaction sites in ZnO NPs could all contribute to the decline in adsorption effectiveness.This finding suggests that ZnO NPs can be used again for phosphorus removal from water for a finite period.ZnO nanoparticles are subjected to alkaline conditions in cycles, and tend to release the adsorbed phosphorus from the surface into the liquid phase.Figure 13b shows the emission of phosphorus in proportions.
Measurements of the experimental test procedure were carried out in triplicates to confirm the accuracy and consistency of the generated data according to the criteria of repeatability and validation [82, 101-104, 107, 109].In four cycles, the same nanoparticles underwent cleaning and reuse.(a) Reusing ZnO nanoparticles four times.Each experiment used a brand-new P-solution.(b) Phosphorus recovery with alkaline treatment and washing.

Antimicrobial study
The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3) for the biosynthesized ZnO NPs were used to assess their antibacterial activity [108].The results are shown in Table 7.The results demonstrated inhibitory zones against Gramnegative bacteria S. typhimurium and E. coli, E. faecalis, and S. aureus after treatment with ZnO NPs at various doses of 50, 100, 150, and 200 μg/mL.(Gram-positive bacteria).The ZnO NPs in Fig. 14  [105], Gram-positive bacteria have a thick peptidoglycan cell wall, while Gram-negative bacteria have cell walls primarily composed of lipopolysaccharides, which provide a less effective defense against the passage of hazardous species into the cytoplasm.Therefore, the presence of an inhibitory zone demonstrates that the mechanism of ZnO NPs activities, which include membrane rupture with a high rate of surface oxygen species multiplication and ultimately result in pathogen mortality, is involved [65].
Comparing 50 μL of (100 μL/mL) ZnO NPs with 50 μL of (150 μg/L) Cefotaxime, DMSO, and Onion extract is shown in Fig. 16.The results indicated that the as-synthesized ZnO NPs have greater antibacterial action than standard Cefotaxime, which was utilized as a positive control.In contrast, the controlled wells supplemented with onion extract and DMSO failed to show any inhibitory zone.Gram-negative bacteria were shown to be more vulnerable to prepared nanoparticles than Grampositive bacteria, as evidenced by the highest inhibition zone against E. coli and S. aureus and the order of E. faecalis, S. typhimurium, and E. Faecalis.However, S. typhimurium had a smaller inhibitory zone, showing that the structural variations in the cell membrane of bacteria account for the changes in their antibacterial activity [106].In conclusion, the antimicrobial activity showed that ZnO NPs were more hazardous to bacterial cells and may be more effective than standard antibiotics at inactivating some human diseases.

Conclusion
The first demonstration of using onion extract as a powerful oxidizing/reducing chemical agent to produce ZnO NPs used a green, unique, and ecologically acceptable method for producing extremely crystalline ZnO NPs.ZnO NPs were characterized using XRD, UV-Vis spectroscopy, FTIR, Raman, SEM, EDX, and TEM.ZnO NPs were used in this work to successfully remove a considerable amount of phosphorus from water.When phosphorus concentration was initially concentrated to 250 mg/L, the maximum adsorption capacity was 89.8 mg/g.The results indicated that a chemisorption process controlled P sorption, and a better match might be obtained by using the kinetics model of pseudo-second-order equations.Additionally, the sorption equilibrium results followed the Langmuir models in the concentration ranges examined.The spontaneous, endothermic, temperature-dependent sorption of phosphorus ions on ZnO NPs.The results showed that the average removal efficiencies of the phosphorus recovery and reusability of ZnO NPs for cycles 1-4 were 38, 32, and 28%, respectively.This finding shows that ZnO NPs can be utilized to temporarily remove phosphorus from water once more.The biosynthesized ZnO NPs were also considered for antibacterial uses.ZnO NPs exhibit superior antibacterial effects against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria when compared to the common antibiotic Cefotaxime.Following E. faecalis and S. typhimurium, E. coli, and S. aureus displayed the highest degrees of inhibition, illustrating the ZnO selective influence on biological systems.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6 Characterization of the biosynthesized ZnO-NPs: a, b represents the SEM image, c, d denotes the TEM image, e SAED pattern and f particle size distribution

Fig. 7
Fig. 7 Analysis of the chemical composition of bio-synthesized ZnO NPs

Fig. 10
Fig. 10 Kinetic models: a Pseudo-first-order, b Pseudo-second-order, c Elovich, and d Intraparticle diffusion plots of phosphorous removal by ZnO NPs

Fig. 13
Fig. 13 Phosphorous removal from water: Recovery and reuse of ZnO NPs.The same nanoparticles were washed and reused for 4 times.(a) Reuse of ZnO NPs for 4 times.For each experiment fresh P-solution was used.(b) Recovery of phosphorous after washing with alkaline treatment

Fig. 15
Fig.15 Antibacterial activities of the biosynthesis ZnO NPs E.coli, S. aureus, E. faecalis, and S. typhimurium.ZnO NPs showed more inhibitory activity against bacteria Gram-negative.E. coli exhibited the highest inhibition zone

Table 1
Comparison between XRD results of biosynthesized ZnO NPs and standard ZnO powder

Table 2
).The spherical ZnO NPs with a typical size of 2.83 to 15.35 nm are shown

Table 2
Comparison between the particles size of ZnO NPs prepared from onion extract and some other plants

Table 3
Kinetic parameters for P ions onto ZnO NPs adsorbent

Table 4
Isotherm parameters for P ions removal onto ZnO NPs adsorbent

Table 5
Thermodynamic parameters for P ions adsorption by ZnO NPs adsorbent

Table 6
Maximum adsorption capacities of phosphorus onto various adsorbents

Table 7
Antibacterial activity of ZnO NPs, as determined by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value (mean ± standard deviation; n = 3)