Skip to main content

Table 3 Regression and validation parameters of the proposed HPLC method for quantitative determination of bisoprolol, carvedilol and atenolol enantiomers using mobile phase n-hexane: ethanol: DEA (60: 40: 0.1 by volume)

From: Enantioseparation, quantification, molecular docking and molecular dynamics study of five β-adrenergic blockers on Lux-Cellulose-2 column

Parameters

Bisoprolol

Carvedilol

Atenolol

Enant. 1

Enant.2

Enant. 1

Enant.2

Enant. 1

Enant.2

Linearity

 Slope(Au-Sec.ml/µg)

3.2975

3.3319

11.8970

11.8030

4.0228

3.9870

 Intercept (Au-Sec)

− 1.2267

− 1.1400

− 15.9670

− 9.9133

50.3600

51.4800

 Correlation coefficient r

0.9995

0.9995

0.9996

0.9996

0.9995

0.9995

 Range (\(\upmu \)g/mL)

50–300

50–300

20–120

20–120

50–300

50–300

 Accuracy (Mean + R.S.D.%)

99.93 + 0.942

99.93 + 0.432

99.98 + 1.030

100.09 + 0.956

100.35 + 0.849

99.97 + 1.185

 *Robustness (RSD %)

0.821

0.426

0.962

0.843

0.787

0.982

 **Robustness (RSD %)

0.624

0.408

0.773

0.641

0.691

0.522

Precision (RSD %)

 Repeatabiltya

0.531

0.314

0.732

0.548

0.492

0.821

 Reproducibilityb

0.722

0.409

0.811

0.699

0.588

0.911

 LODc (\(\upmu \)g/mL)

6.7

6.7

2.7

2.7

6.7

6.7

 LOQc (\(\upmu \)g/mL)

20

20

8

8

20

20

  1. aIntra-day (n = 3), average of three concentration of each drug repeated three times within the same day
  2. bInter-day (n = 3), average of three concentration of each drug repeated three times three consecutive days
  3. cLOD = 3.3 (SD/S), LOQ = 10 (SD/S), where SD is the standard deviation of regression residuals and S is the slope of calibration curves
  4. *The robustness of the proposed method was investigated by analysis of samples under deliberate change in flow rate ± 0.1 mL/min
  5. **The robustness of the proposed method was investigated by analysis of samples under deliberate change in Temperature ± 0.1 °C