Table 3 Comparison of the method extraction efficiency with the other PAHs determination techniques
Analytical technique | Fiber coating | Samples | LR (µg L–1) | LOD (µg L–1) | RSD% | Extraction time (min) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DI-SPME-GC-FID | DVB/CAR/PDMS | Lake water | 0.003‒0.10 | 0.003‒0.030 | 0.30‒19.00 | 100 | [52] |
DI-HS-GC–MS | PDMS/DVB | Water | 0.30‒10.00 | 0.07‒0.32 | 0.60‒24.29 | 80 | [53] |
HS-GC-FID | PDMS/DVB | Aqueous sample | 0.10‒200.00 | 0.03‒1.00 | 5.00‒13.00 | 30 | [54] |
D-μ-SPE- GC‒MS | Zeolitic material | Water | 2.08–208.00 | 0.10–0.89 | 0.03–6.49 | 10 | [55] |
HS-SPME-HPLC‒UV | 3-(trimethoxysilyl)-1-propanthiol | Water | 1.00‒500 | 0.03–1.00 | 4.10–6.70 | 20 | [56] |
DI-SPME-HPLC-FLD | PDMS/DVB | Water | 0.40‒169.9 | 0.07‒0.99 | 9.90–13.10 | 90 | [57] |
DI-SPME-HPLC–UV | CFYM | Groundwater; River water | 0.005–100.00 | 0.14‒1.83 | 4.40‒8.20 | 90 | [58] |
DI-coiled-SPME-HPLC–UV | Bone wastes | Tab water; Well water; Roadside soil | 0.01–99.00 | 0.03–0.10 | 3.10‒9.00 | 70 | [59] |
DI-SPME-HPLC‒UV | Nickel/graphene oxide/nickel-complex | Tomato Potato Bread | 0.10‒200.0 | 0.03–0.30 | 0.32‒2.94 | 30 | This work |