Skip to main content

Table 1 RMSD values (in Å) between the best docking poses of ligands and the conformations in co-crystal structures for all retrieved actives ligands

From: Docking-based virtual screening of TβR1 inhibitors: evaluation of pose prediction and scoring functions

NO.

Ligand

MW

RMSD values (Å)

LibDock

CDOCKER

1

1RW8

293.338

0.2397

1.5416

2

1PY5

272.304

1.1255

1.1468

3

1VJY

287.319

0.2443

0.3263

4

2WOU

369.418

2.0171

0.3847

5

2WOT

458.509

0.5475

0.2087

6

2X7O

494.627

0.9240

0.6066

7

3GXL

352.392

0.3867

0.4265

8

3FAA

362.36

5.6841

1.5150

9

3HMM

313.356

0.2322

0.1976

10

3KCF

360.409

0.6144

0.2904

11

3TZM

390.435

4.9755

4.8933

12

4X2F

253.259

5.7255

0.4702

13

4X2G

253.259

5.2960

1.1824

14

4X2J

253.259

6.2834

0.3497

15

5E8W

466.531

0.7055

1.2770

16

5E8Z

420.464

8.5303

1.1120

17

5FRI

332.742

4.9761

0.3629

18

5QIK

365.361

0.9489

0.2173

19

5QIL

359.381

0.9670

0.2635

20

5QIM

359.381

6.9569

0.7050

21

5USQ

438.928

1.8278

1.9753

22

6B8Y

374.295

0.2779

0.2861

Success rate

  

59%

95%

  1. Ligands were named with the PDB ID; MW, molecular weight; docking results with RMSD ≤ 2.0 Å are considered successful, and docking results with RMSD > 2.0 Å are considered to be failed