Skip to main content

Table 1 Effects of simulated digestion on monomeric phenolic in different varieties of lychee pericarp by HPLC–DAD

From: Effects of simulated digestion on the phenolic composition and antioxidant activity of different cultivars of lychee pericarp

Mono phenolic (mg/g DW)

Jizui

Lizhiwang

Guiwei

Yuhe

Nuomici

Guihong

Caffeic acid

DW

0.10 ± 0.01a

0.99 ± 0.04c

0.24 ± 0.03a

0.16 ± 0.07a

0.21 ± 0.05a

0.54 ± 0.17b

SGF

0.07 ± 0.00a,*

0.79 ± 0.03e,*

0.25 ± 0.06b

0.28 ± 0.01b,*

0.50 ± 0.12c,*

0.69 ± 0.02d

SIF

NDa,*

NDa,*

ND*

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

Ferulic acid

DW

0.35 ± 0.02a

3.39 ± 0.18e

0.83 ± 0.05b

1.07 ± 0.33b

1.42 ± 0.20c

1.74 ± 0.03d

SGF

0.25 ± 0.05b,*

0.09 ± 0.06a,*

0.38 ± 0.04c,*

0.40 ± 0.08ac,*

1.32 ± 0.07d

NDa,*

SIF

0.17 ± 0.07a,*

0.87 ± 0.21d,*

0.34 ± 0.06b,*

0.06 ± 0.01a,*

0.54 ± 0.05c,*

0.59 ± 0.01c,*

Procyanidin B2

DW

1.14 ± 0.19a

9.42 ± 0.41e

3.09 ± 0.28c

2.49 ± 0.11b

2.04 ± 0.49b

5.56 ± 0.35d

SGF

0.73 ± 0.10a,*

7.05 ± 0.28e,*

2.63 ± 0.31c

2.14 ± 0.17b,*

2.77 ± 0.02c,*

6.19 ± 0.11d,*

SIF

0.70 ± 0.03a,*

1.47 ± 0.29c,*

0.49 ± 0.02a,*

0.48 ± 0.04a,*

0.40 ± 0.04a,*

1.14 ± 0.08b,*

Epicatechin

DW

0.16 ± 0.07a

4.48 ± 0.59d

2.25 ± 0.04b

1.81 ± 0.11b

3.23 ± 0.31c

4.50 ± 0.36d

SGF

0.87 ± 0.13a,*

3.60 ± 0.34c

1.39 ± 0.28a,*

1.39 ± 0.22a,*

2.97 ± 0.49b

3.85 ± 0.15c,*

SIF

0.39 ± 0.05a,*

2.19 ± 0.83c,*

0.21 ± 0.00a,*

0.06 ± 0.02a,*

1.19 ± 0.36b,*

1.98 ± 0.07c,*

A-type procyanidin trimer

DW

1.10 ± 0.11d

0.81 ± 0.07c

0.07 ± 0.01a

0.03 ± 0.00a

0.38 ± 0.01b

0.38 ± 0.16b

SGF

NDa,*

1.15 ± 0.23b

0.16 ± 0.08a,*

0.02 ± 0.00a,*

0.05 ± 0.05a,*

0.17 ± 0.08a,*

SIF

0.15 ± 0.01a,*

2.09 ± 0.40b,*

NDa

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

Procyanidin A2

DW

1.50 ± 0.09a

3.76 ± 0.08d

1.36 ± 0.21a

1.97 ± 0.08b

1.32 ± 0.13a

2.58 ± 0.18c

SGF

1.01 ± 0.10a,*

2.89 ± 0.80cv

1.39 ± 0.02a*

1.92 ± 0.21ab

1.22 ± 0.18a

2.52 ± 0.54bc

SIF

0.94 ± 0.04a*

2.22 ± 0.34b*

0.87 ± 0.07a

0.83 ± 0.00a*

1.66 ± 0.28a

1.91 ± 0.13a

Quercetin-3-rutinose-7-rhamnoside

DW

0.26 ± 0.02a

2.00 ± 0.06c

0.64 ± 0.10b

0.81 ± 0.09b

0.40 ± 0.18a

0.81 ± 0.14b

SGF

0.29 ± 0.04a

2.72 ± 0.14e*

0.54 ± 0.05b

0.82 ± 0.14c

0.70 ± 0.03bc*

1.36 ± 0.09d

SIF

1.06 ± 0.00b*

0.46 ± 0.13a*

0.36 ± 0.08a*

0.49 ± 0.03a*

0.77 ± 0.01b*

1.09 ± 0.02b

Isoquercitrin

DW

0.32 ± 0.06a

1.42 ± 0.09d

0.35 ± 0.04a

0.50 ± 0.04b

0.41 ± 0.06ab

0.71 ± 0.05c

SGF

0.34 ± 0.04a

1.30 ± 0.16d

0.30 ± 0.06a

0.57 ± 0.11b

0.46 ± 0.08ab

0.94 ± 0.09c,*

SIF

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

NDa,*

  1. Values expressed as mg/g DW
  2. ND not detected, DW distilled water extraction, SGF simulated gastric fluid digestion, SIF simulated intestinal fluid digestion
  3. Values not sharing a common letter within the same row indicate a significant difference (p < 0.05). In the same monomer phenolic and the same variety
  4. * Stands for significant difference with DW (p < 0.05). mean ± SD, n = 3. The content of A-type procyanidin trimer was calculated by the standard curve of procyanidin A2