Skip to main content

Table 2 In vitro antimicrobial activity of the synthesized compounds

From: Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of 3-(2-aminooxazol-5-yl)-2H-chromen-2-one derivatives

Comp.

Antimicrobial screening

(MIC = µM)

SA

EC

BS

PA

SE

CA

AN

1

61.5

61.5

61.5

30.8

61.5

30.8

30.8

2

72.2

72.2

72.2

36.1

36.1

36.1

72.2

3

14.8

14.8

59.2

59.2

59.2

29.6

29.6

4

63.5

63.5

31.7

63.5

63.5

31.7

31.7

5

59.2

59.2

59.2

29.6

59.2

29.6

29.6

6

71.3

71.3

71.3

35.6

17.8

35.6

17.8

7

34.6

34.6

34.6

69.2

69.2

34.6

34.6

8

34.9

34.9

17.5

69.8

69.8

34.9

69.8

9

77.6

77.6

38.8

38.8

77.6

38.8

38.8

10

36.5

36.5

73.0

36.5

73.0

36.5

36.5

11

69.2

34.6

34.6

34.6

69.2

69.2

69.2

12

34.6

34.6

34.6

34.6

69.2

34.6

69.2

13

63.5

63.5

63.5

31.7

63.5

31.7

63.5

14

69.1

69.1

69.1

17.3

69.1

34.5

69.1

15

65.1

65.1

32.6

32.6

65.1

32.6

65.1

Cefadroxil

17.2

17.2

17.2

17.2

17.2

–

–

Fluconazole

–

–

–

–

–

20.4

20.4

  1. SA, Staphylococcus aureus, EC, Escherichia coli; BS, Bacillus subtilis; PA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; SE, Salmonella enterica; CA, Candida albicans; AN, Aspergillus niger