Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of results

From: Modeling tool using neural networks for l(+)-lactic acid production by pellet-form Rhizopus oryzae NRRL 395 on biodiesel crude glycerol

Training method

Number of layers

Number of neurons on each layer

Mean squared error

Levenberg–Marquardt

2

15

0.15

Levenberg–Marquardt

3

15

0.51

Levenberg–Marquardt

4

15

0.157

Levenberg–Marquardt

2

20

1.7

Levenberg–Marquardt

3

20

0.36

Levenberg–Marquardt

4

20

0.08

Levenberg–Marquardt

2

25

0.79

Levenberg–Marquardt

3

25

0.04

Levenberg–Marquardt

4

25

184.5

Quasi-Newton

2

15

244.23

Quasi-Newton

3

15

781.88

Quasi-Newton

4

15

482.86

Quasi-Newton

2

20

351.43

Quasi-Newton

3

20

499.8

Quasi-Newton

4

20

217.64

Quasi-Newton

2

25

431.66

Quasi-Newton

3

25

172.11

Quasi-Newton

4

25

898.75

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

2

15

244.23

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

3

15

781.88

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

4

15

482.86

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

2

20

351.43

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

3

20

499.8

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

4

20

217.64

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

2

25

431.66

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

3

25

172.11

Scaled Conjugate Gradient

4

25

898.75

Fletcher–Powell

2

15

244.23

Fletcher–Powell

3

15

781.88

Fletcher–Powell

4

15

482.86

Fletcher–Powell

2

20

351.43

Fletcher–Powell

3

20

499.8

Fletcher–Powell

4

20

217.64

Fletcher–Powell

2

25

431.66

Fletcher–Powell

3

25

172.11

Fletcher–Powell

4

25

898.75

Polak–Ribiere

2

15

244.23

Polak–Ribiere

3

15

781.88

Polak–Ribiere

4

15

482.86

Polak–Ribiere

2

20

351.43

Polak–Ribiere

3

20

499.8

Polak–Ribiere

4

20

217.64

Polak–Ribiere

2

25

431.66

Polak–Ribiere

3

25

172.11

Polak–Ribiere

4

25

898.75