Skip to main content

Table 3 Docking score, glide energies and emodel energies of synthesized molecules

From: Synthesis, anti-microbial activity, cytotoxicity of some novel substituted (5-(3-(1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)-4-hydroxybenzyl)benzofuran-2-yl)(phenyl)methanone analogs

Compounds

Docking score (XP)

Glide energy

Glide emodel

4a

− 7.35

− 59.84

− 80.02

4b

− 7.28

− 56.66

− 83.06

4c

− 7.26

− 48.51

− 80.93

4d

− 7.37

− 57.01

− 81.29

4e

− 7.9

− 62.78

− 92.94

4f

− 8.19

− 60.83

− 88

4g

− 7.81

− 66.62

− 85.31

4h

− 7.03

− 57.46

− 80.99

4i

− 7.77

− 61.28

− 85.58

4j

− 7.77

− 57.26

− 87.24

4k

− 7.05

− 55.46

− 78.16

4l

− 7.52

− 57.63

− 88.4

4m

− 6.01

− 64.76

− 92.76

4n

− 6.6

− 61.97

− 87.16

4o

− 6.6

− 56.48

− 84.56

4p

− 7.66

− 50.89

− 77.65

4q

− 6.19

− 59.74

− 81.1

4r

− 6.61

− 59.19

− 84.84

4s

− 6.91

− 61.1

− 78.29

4t

− 7.28

− 61.13

− 85.76

4u

− 7.33

− 57.56

− 84.96

  1. Italic values are the best active compounds (4d, 4f & 4g) with binding energy values like docking score, glide energies and emodel energies