Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical comparison for the results obtained by the proposed spectrophotometric methods, the reported method [23] for the analysis of DRO and official methods [24, 25] for analysis of CAF and PCT

From: Different applications of isosbestic points, normalized spectra and dual wavelength as powerful tools for resolution of multicomponent mixtures with severely overlapping spectra

Values

DRO

CAF

PCT

Proposed methods

Reported method [23]a

Proposed methods

Official method [24]b

Proposed methods

Official method [25]c

D0

RD-Iso

IRD

DD-RD-DW

AAS

AAM

S1DD

RD-Iso

IRD

AAS

AAM

S1DD

RD-Iso

IRD

DD-RD-DW

Mean

99.79

99.93

99.91

99.80

100.25

99.01

99.90

99.82

99.72

99.83

99.56

100.14

100.18

99.63

100.08

100.19

100.05

99.98

SD

0.48

0.57

0.30

0.49

0.39

0.81

0.78

0.65

0.79

0.70

0.59

0.21

0.58

0.40

0.45

0.16

0.27

0.25

RSD%

0.481

0.570

0.300

0.490

0.389

0.818

0.780

0.651

0.792

0.701

0.592

2.097

0.578

0.402

0.449

0.159

0.269

0.250

n

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

5

Variance

0.2304

0.324

0.0900

0.240

0.1521

0.6561

0.6084

0.4225

0.6241

0.49

0.3481

0.0441

0.3364

0.1600

0.2025

0.0256

0.0729

0.0625

Student’s t testd (2.306)

1.663

1.036

0.1609

1.607

 

1.227

0.7774

0.6623

0.3629

0.5281

 

1.096

0.7081

1.659

0.4344

0.1523

0.4254

 

F valued

1.515

2.136

1.690

1.579

 

1.885

1.748

1.214

1.793

1.408

 

1.417

5.382

2.560

3.240

2.441

1.166

 
  1. aDualwavelength spectrophotometric method at 271.5 and 280.0 nm
  2. bPotentiometric titration using 0.1 M perchloric acid
  3. cDirect UV spectrophotometric method, measuring the absorbance in water at 244 nm
  4. dThe values in the parenthesis are the corresponding theoretical values of t and F at P = 0.05