Skip to main content

Table 2 Analysis of variance for central composite design and tests of the regression coefficients and intercepts of coded equations for curdione, furanodienone, curcumol and germacrone

From: Optimization and in vitro antiproliferation of Curcuma wenyujin’s active extracts by ultrasonication and response surface methodology

Source

Mean squares

F

p value

Coefficient estimate

Curdione

Model

0.075

12.99

0.0014

 

Intercept

   

1.790

X 1

0.360

61.88

0.0001

0.160

X 2

0.120

20.88

0.0026

0.094

X 3

0.042

7.29

0.0307

0.056

X 1 X 2

0.029

5.04

0.0596

−0.060

X 1 X 3

1.326 × 10−3

0.23

0.6466

−0.013

X 2 X 3

8.001 × 10−3

1.38

0.2779

0.032

X 2 1

4.588 × 10−3

0.79

0.4027

−0.020

X 2 2

0.110

19.80

0.0030

−0.100

X 2 3

3.531 × 10−3

0.61

0.4601

−0.018

Lack of Fit

6.474 × 10−3

1.60

0.4281

 

R 2 = 0.9435, Q 2 = 0.8677, Adeq Precision = 12.121

Furanodienone

Model

0.098

27.14

0.0001

 

Intercept

   

1.370

X 1

0.330

90.16

<0.0001

0.150

X 2

0.190

51.54

0.0002

0.120

X 3

0.110

29.00

0.0010

0.088

X 1 X 2

9.730 × 10−3

2.69

0.1452

−0.035

X 1 X 3

1.966 × 10−3

0.54

0.4852

−0.013

X 2 X 3

1.566 × 10−4

0.04

0.8412

4.425 × 10−3

X 2 1

0.025

7.01

0.0331

−0.047

X 2 2

0.250

70.00

<0.0001

−0.150

X 2 3

0.015

4.14

0.0813

−0.036

Lack of Fit

3.853 × 10−3

1.27

0.4963

 

R 2 = 0.9721, Q 2 = 0.9117, Adeq Precision = 16.176

Curcumol

Model

2.694 × 10−3

15.43

0.0008

 

Intercept

   

0.210

X 1

8.931 × 10−3

51.15

0.0002

0.026

X 2

4.953 × 10−3

28.37

0.0011

0.019

X 3

2.519 × 10−3

14.43

0.0067

0.014

X 1 X 2

1.739 × 10−4

1.00

0.3515

−4.663 × 10−3

X 1 X 3

9.453 × 10−5

0.54

0.4858

3.437 × 10−3

X 2 X 3

9.045 × 10−5

0.52

0.4950

3.362 × 10−3

X 2 1

3.674 × 10−7

2.10 × 10−3

0.9647

−1.805 × 10−4

X 2 2

6.848 × 10−3

39.22

0.0004

−0.025

X 2 3

2.553 × 10−4

1.46

0.2658

−4.759 × 10−3

Lack of Fit

2.209 × 10−4

3.76

0.2232

 

R 2 = 0.9520, Q 2 = 0.8957, Adeq Precision = 14.233

Germacrone

Model

7.756 × 10−3

16.36

0.0007

 
 

Intercept

   

0.350

X 1

0.023

49.39

0.0002

0.041

X 2

0.010

21.15

0.0025

0.027

X 3

9.435 × 10−3

19.90

0.0029

0.026

X 1 X 2

8.694 × 10−4

1.83

0.2178

−0.010

X 1 X 3

9.940 × 10−5

0.21

0.6609

3.525 × 10−3

X 2 X 3

1.682 × 10−5

0.04

0.8559

1.450 × 10−3

X 2 1

7.945 × 10−4

1.68

0.2365

−8.395 × 10−3

X 2 2

0.025

52.89

0.0002

−0.047

X 2 3

4.873 × 10−4

1.03

0.3444

−6.574 × 10−3

Lack of Fit

6.264 × 10−4

6.72

0.1346

 

R 2 = 0.9546, Q 2 = 0.9076, Adeq Precision = 13.465

  1. X 1 Liquid to solid ratio (mL g−1); X 2 Ethanol concentration (%); X 3 Ultrasonic time (min)