Skip to main content

Table 3 number of bronze objects in each group using the Attribute-Value classification method (4 researchers and daily use), * not used in the PCA analysis

From: Rings or daggers, axes or fibulae have a different composition? A multivariate study on Central Italy bronzes from eneolithic to early iron age

builder

gr.name

how many obj.

builder

gr.name

how many obj.

GGroup

1, eneolithic

2

USEgroup

1, sword

10

 

2, antique bronze

21

 

2, needle

9

 

3, middle bronze

14

 

3, spearhead

19

 

4,middle-late bronze

7

 

4, rings

9

 

5, late bronze

33

 

5, axe

27

 

6, final bronze

22

 

6, ingots

6

 

7, final bronze, 1^ Fe

19

 

7, nail

4

 

8, 1^Fe

11

 

8, knife

10

*

9, VII-VI a.C.

5

 

9, sickle

1

GVgroup

1, ornaments

32

 

10, brooch

17

 

2, sharpened

15

 

11, sheath

2

 

3, axes

27

 

12, earring

1

 

4, swords

12

 

13, arrowhead

4

 

5, spearheads

18

 

14, razor

5

 

6, ingots

6

 

15, spring wire

5

 

7, sheaths

2

*

16, damascene Fe rich

5

 

8, pointed, heavy

8

RRgroup

1, flat blades

28

 

9, pointed, light

9

 

2, pointed, tip

14

*

10, damascene Fe rich

5

 

3, long blades

26

SHPgroup

1, pointed

59

 

4, cutting blades, knives

12

 

2, sharp

64

 

5, wire or wirewound

41

 

3, for foundry industry

6

 

6, fodero di spada

2

*

4, Fe rich objects

5

 

7, for foundry industry

6

   

*

8, Fe rich objects

5