Skip to main content

Table 1 The IC 50 values of five RC extracts and the positive controls (μg/mL)

From: Antioxidant activity and mechanism of Rhizoma Cimicifugae

Assays

PERC

EARC

AERC

95ERC

WRC

GSH

Anti-lipid peroxidation

13.99 ± 2.11e

4.55 ± 0.44 b

14.92 ± 4.31 d

10.62 ± 0.97 c

19.18 ± 2.04 f

0.028 ± 0.00 a *

DNA protective effect

-

1905.51 ± 177.54 c

14397.18 ± 1075.01 d

1090.11 ± 21.25 b

-

114.42 ± 2.66 a **

·OH

561.19 ± 21.16 f

111.55 ± 1.32 c

132.32 ± 0.15 d

84.30 ± 1.02 b

233.45 ± 15.70 e

37.67 ± 0.67 a **

·O2-

322.81 ± 14.90 b

306.68 ± 0.87 b

284.36 ± 11.43 b

301.08 ± 8.34 b

650.65 ± 59.55 c

81.65 ± 5.21 a

Chelating

191.86 ± 1.84 b

319.20 ± 6.36 c

872.71 ± 30.63 e

553.34 ± 12.59 d

2289.11 ± 100.00 f

107.86 ± 0.31 a ***

DPPH·

813.00 ± 225.17 d

227.09 ± 10.14 b

260.34 ± 11.37 c

254.73 ± 4.33 c

229.17 ± 5.81 b

5.13 ± 1.19 a **

ABTS·+

395.65 ± 77.34 e

72.10 ± 1.32 b

96.39 ± 1.12 d

94.38 ± 2.45 d

83.58 ± 0.81 c

4.76 ± 0.28 a

Fe3+ reducing

533.12 ± 54.25 e

159.35 ± 1.37 b

317.06 ± 3.47 c

156.19 ± 2.12 b

488.75 ± 18.6 0 d

51.89 ± 1.29 a

  1. IC50 value is defined as the concentration of 50% effect percentage and calculated by linear regression analysis and expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). The linear regression was analyzed by Origin 6.0 professional software. Means values with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05), while with same superscripts are not significantly different (p < 0.05). *The positive control was BHA, instead of GSH. ** The positive control was Trolox, instead of GSH. *** The positive control was Sodium citrate. Results were analyzed by independent samples. PERC, petroleum ether extract of rhizoma Cimicifugae; EARC, ethyl acetate extract of rhizoma Cimicifugae; AERC, absolute ethanol extract of rhizoma Cimicifugae; 95ERC, 95% ethanol extract of rhizoma Cimicifugae; WRC, water extract of rhizoma Cimicifugae. --: Cannot be detected.